Trying to kill a vicious offshoot
by Tom Pearson The case of the Hanson electoral rort has two interconnected parts; the legal and the political. First is the legal question. Pauline Hanson and her cohort David Ettridge were sentenced to three years jail for electoral fraud. The jury found that Hanson fraudulently registered the One Nation party in Queensland in 1997 and dishonestly obtained $500,000 in electoral reimbursements following the 1998 Queensland State election. Workplace Relations Minister Tony Abbott, who engineered Hanson's downfall through a slush fund legal vendetta, may now also face prosecution under Australia's electoral laws. The Australian Electoral Commission has announced that, after receiving legal advice, it is reconsidering its finding in 1998 that Abbott's slush fund — called contemptuously Australians for Honest Politics — was not connected to the Liberal Party. The law requires political parties to declare the sources of donations used for party purposes. Then there is the political question. The irony will not be lost on people that one of the planks in Hanson's political platform was a campaign for harsher sentencing and longer jail terms. Nor will they miss the fact of Abbott's use of the law and legal system to try and smash the trade union movement and workers' rights to collectively bargain, while he has covertly organised a collective of filthy rich individuals and influential political figures to target the leadership of other parties for regime change. The Australian Democrats were also pursued through legal action for seven years to 2002 by a group for "honest politics". In a statement last week the Democrats outlined how "A political party then capable of marshalling over a million votes [the Democrats] had its leader, deputy leader and its organisation assailed through a series of well-funded legal cases." The Democrats say one of the donors who funded that offensive is also a donor to the current Abbott slush fund. Only two donors have so far been revealed — the head of WA-based engineering company, Harold Clough, and Trevor Kennedy, a former Kerry Packer media executive. The Democrats also point to the secretive nature of these funds that are "designed to reduce political competition". But then, the Liberal Party has always been a secretive clique: backroom deals, collusion and character assassination are its modus operandi. Undermining individuals and bringing down organisations that pose a threat to Liberal electoral turf is almost child's play for the party that secretly trained a whole scab labour force in Dubai, in collusion with waterfront employers, to try and bludgeon the Maritime Union out of existence. Thus we have the endless bleating of PM Howard that he is the last to know — about secret meetings with ethanol producers, about children overboard, about Dubai, about Abbott's slush fund: one finally must conclude that he is either a hand puppet or a liar. It is the party that produced the founders of One Nation, Hanson and David Oldfield. After all, the Liberal Party has historically embraced fascist ideas, and fascists themselves when Nazi fugitives from justice were welcomed (covertly, of course) by the Liberal Party Government of Robert Menzies after WW2, a number of them slotting comfortably into the ranks of party membership. So it should come as no surprise when in the 21st century it produces fascist-minded ideologues like Hanson and Oldfield, both former Liberal Party members; Oldfield a staffer for Abbott when the latter was parliamentary secretary; Hanson a former Liberal Party candidate in Queensland. Moreover, despite perceptions to the contrary, the current government did not steal One Nation's policies but was in fact the architect of them. The implementation of the "Pacific Solution", the locking up of asylum seekers in desert prison camps, the gutting of Indigenous rights, the draconian anti-union laws, the wholesale undermining of democratic rights: all came out of the right-wing think tanks and corporate boardroom brainstorming that are the basis of Liberal Party policy formulation. At the political centre are the reactionary power brokers of the Liberal Party, thugs in expensive suits, of which Abbott is one. When One Nation gathered pockets of voter support in certain areas running with an opportunistic and populist platform based on fear and racism, they were clearly trespassing on Liberal Party ground. As Abbott himself put it, his slush fund was set up "to prevent the creation of a credible rival for the conservative vote". So, the Howard Government set out to kill its vicious offshoot: a distilled and dangerous concoction of fascist aspirations. And the final irony in this episode may be that the system they all used and manipulated toward their own ends is turning around to bite them back.