Services for all or tax cuts for the few
by Peter Symon The revelation that the Federal Government budget has a $7.5 billion tax surplus shows conclusively that the savage cutbacks that the Howard Government has made to public health, education and many welfare programs cannot be justified. The money was there to finance these government responsibilities. The cutbacks were driven by the Howard Government's ideological agenda, their hostility to everything that is publicly owned and that benefits the ordinary working people and their families. The budget income and expenditure is not audited by any outside body and the surplus may be much more than has been revealed. It has not been achieved as a result of "good management" by Howard and Costello but by the millions of dollars cut from the proportion of government expenditure going to health and education and other welfare programs. Other contributing factors are the imposition of the GST by the Howard Government that has taken billions from the pockets of mainly working people. Over $31 billion was collected from the GST in the last financial year and it has been rising by about $3 billion each year. Bracket creep Another factor is "bracket creep" that pushes some wage and salary earners into more highly taxed brackets. There is a justified argument that tax brackets should be adjusted to take account of the increase in wage levels for some categories of workers. There has been a massive assault on the unemployed, disabled persons, carer allowances and those receiving other necessary welfare benefits. The Howard Government is the most destructive of essential services that Australia has ever had. At the same time it has imposed on working people the heaviest tax regime of any in the developed industrialised countries. The statements by Howard and Costello following the announcement of the budget surplus clearly indicate their cycnical preference for tax concessions to middle income earners in the hope that this will win their vote for the present government in the next Federal election. Priority The priority must now be established by a massive public demand that the monies cut from health, education and other social welfare benefits be restored and that this BE GIVEN PRIORITY over tax cuts to only a few. This provides benefits to all and particularly to low and middle income earners to pensioners and other welfare beneficiaries. The fact that the Government has been forced to suspend the health insurance levy imposed on doctors as a result of the threatened resignation of specialist doctors shows that decisive action by sections of the community can force a retreat by the government. * The budget surplus must be used to increase the rebate paid to doctors so that Medicare bulk-billing can be maintained as a service to every member of the community. * The free public dental service destroyed by the Howard Government should be re-established. * Some of the surplus could be used to re-establish government insurance offices so that the huge costs imposed on doctors by way of insurance premiums could be scaled back and contained. The policy of privatisation should be reversed. * Millions are available to properly fund universities and to wind back the new impositions recently forced on the public education system. HECs fees should be completely abolished. (In the 1970s it was possible to have free tuition in universities but 30 years later universities are being starved while huge debts are being forced on students). * Any government concerned for the Australian people and the future of our country should reestablish free public education from kindergarten to university. Who pays? A basic question concerning taxation is, who pays? While company tax has been reduced from 47c in the dollar to its present 30c in the dollar — and many companies pay much less than this requirement, with some paying no tax at all — tax paid by working families has gone up, particularly as a result of the GST. The CPA remains adamantly opposed to the discriminatory GST. It should be replaced with a progressive tax system based on earned income, particularly by tax paid on company profits. The fact that many families are vastly worse off is revealed in the figures for household debt which has risen from $290 billion in 1996 (the year the Howard Government was first elected) to $660 billion now. This situation demands that the financial policies being pursued by the government are forcing many more to borrow to keep going. The debt on credit card borrowings is now substantially over $20 billion — over $1000 for every man, woman and child in Australia. Another source of budget income could be that from the profits earned by publicly owned enterprises. The stupidity of the privatisation of public enterprises and facilities such as the sale of Qantas, airports, Telstra, the sell-off of buildings previously owned by governments, is now apparent. Kenneth Davidson writing in the Melbourne Age writes, ".the dividends forgone from the sale of half of Telstra are greater than the interest saved on the retirement of debt. The leaseback arrangements from the sale of Government property such as the Foreign Affairs headquarters are far more expensive than the previous situation in which the Government owned the buildings". He writes, "an extra billion dollars a year put back into public hospitals and universities would generate jobs and take pressure off household debt". Letters carried in daily newspapers and the response on talk-back radio indicate that many people do not support tax cuts while allocations to public services such as health, education and welfare are further attacked and neglected. Public pressure demanding that these services be given priority needs to be built from now until the next election as part of the campaign to decisively defeat this most conservative and anti-people government that Australia has ever suffered. Letters to newspapers and participation in talk-back radio session, writing to your local Federal member and Senator will all help to build the campaign. Vital statistics: Foreign debts has grown from $190 billion when the Howard Government was elected to $360 billion now. Commonwealth taxation has increased from 23.5 percent of GDP (1996) to 25.4 percent of GDP in 2003. Household debt is up from $290 billion in 1996 to $660 billion now. The Federal Government's GST rip-off increased from $27 billion when first introduced in 2001 to $341.25 billion in the last financial year.