Universities strike back
As The Guardian goes to press, staff at universities across the country are preparing for a national strike on Thursday, October 16. The strike has been called by the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU). They will be resisting attempts by the federal government to impose anti-union industrial relations in the university sector by threatening to withhold $404 million of core funding. A leaflet published by the NTEU and distributed at a picket conducted at Sydney University says that staff at Sydney University are striking in protest at the Federal Government's attempt to sabotage fruitful negotiations between University management and workers. It says that the Vice-Chancellor and the NTEU were on the point of signing the "heads of agreement" for a new enterprise bargaining agreement after 12 months of negotiation in good faith and without any disruption in the workplace. The agreement allowed the University to pursue its mission while providing improved conditions for all staff in the form of better parental leave; regulation and improvement of conditions for casual staff; employment of more indigenous staff; improved career development opportunities for general staff; better policies on academic workloads and a decent pay rise. The Government intervened at the eleventh hour to try and force the University to abandon its agreement with the NTEU and to implement instead, a grab-bag of new, anti-Union workplace regulations. The University management is opposed to the government's ideological industrial relations crusade but the Government is pointing a gun at their head as the extra funds are desperately needed even though $404 million does not even touch the sides of the gaping hole left by previous funding cuts. The Government claims that it simply wants Universities to give staff the "option" of being employed under an individual Australian Workplace Agreement (AWA). The NTEU says this is a cheap and very dirty trick dressed up in the rhetoric of "free choice". University staff already have the option of negotiating an individual common law agreement with their employer. The Government is not satisfied however, says the NTEU. Under current arrangements any individual contract offered by a University must at least match, if not surpass, the working conditions set out in collective bargaining agreements. This means that any staff who take an individual contract have a strong collective agreement to fall back on. An Australian Workplace Agreement, however, is a form of contract that explicitly cuts off access to such a safety net. The minimum standard becomes whatever employers can get away with offering to the most vulnerable of their employees. Government objectives The NTEU says that the Government is trying to make it unlawful for University managements to work cooperatively with Unions — unlawful to have Unions directly representing their members in grievances and disputes; unlawful to distribute information about the Union to new staff; unlawful to let staff have their Union fees deducted through the payroll system and unlawful to give the Union use of an office. The NTEU has also pointed out that if the Government has its way it will become unlawful for University management and Unions to even attempt to negotiate a cap on the proportion of staff employed as casuals. Yet, says the NTEU, unlimited casualisation will do nothing to improve, let alone maintain standards of teaching and research.