Issues at stake in Sri Lankan crisis
Twenty months ago, with Norwegian mediation, a ceasefire was declared putting an end to the fighting between the Sri Lankan armed forces and the LTTE [Tamil Tigers as they are commonly known — Guardian]. Talks began to resolve the longstanding and chronic problem of how to accommodate the Tamil minority aspirations within the framework of Sri Lanka. After a few rounds of negotiations, the talks got stalled in April 2003 when the LTTE refused to carry on, accusing the Sri Lankan government of violating some of the agreements. The Norwegian mediators backed by the United States and other European countries worked to revive the stalled talks. As a result, the LTTE submitted proposals for an "Interim Self- Governing Authority" for the north-eastern region. It is this proposal that has precipitated the confrontation between the President, Chandrika Kumaratunga, and the Prime Minister, Wickremesinghe. Separate state The LTTE proposal is nothing but the prelude to the setting up a separate state of Eelam. A study of the document shows that the powers demanded for the authority go outside the framework of the Sri Lankan state. The LTTE wants an absolute majority in the authority with some Muslim and Sinhala participation. It wants the appointment of an independent election commission to conduct elections. The Self Governing Authority would have the powers to raise taxes, maintain law and order and establish its own legal system. The document says "separate institutions for the administration of justice shall be established for the north-east and judicial powers shall be vested for such institutions". The document states the authority should have control over the marine and offshore resources of the adjacent seas and the power to regulate them. This can be undertaken only with a naval force. The LTTE's proposals negate a federal structure with substantial regional autonomy. It is a blueprint for a separate state. It is understandable that such a proposal would alarm those who are committed to Sri Lanka being a united entity. President Kumaratunga has been voicing her concern throughout the negotiations at the manner in which the LTTE is being allowed to consolidate its position in the north-east without decommissioning its armed forces. She had seriously objected to the Norwegian proposal to allow the LTTE certain naval facilities. Recently she called for the removal of the Norwegian mediator in the negotiations. The Wickremesinghe Government reacted cautiously to the LTTE proposals stating they can be the basis for further talks while commenting that the proposal went beyond the proposals of the government. President Kumaratunga, on her part, has strongly opposed the interim authority proposal, rejecting it as inimical to the unity and integrity of Sri Lanka. The United States has announced that it supports the prime minister in the name of backing the peace process. In the recent period, especially after September 11, the United States has shown keen interest in intervening in the Sri Lankan situation and the ethnic conflict. The doctrine expounded by the United States and certain European countries that state sovereignty should be subordinated to problems of human rights and the solution of ethnic conflicts is also at work in aggravating the complicated nationality problem in Sri Lanka. While the stand taken by Sinhala chauvinists of denying any autonomy based on a federal structure and the separatist stand of the LTTE have to be rejected the genuine rights of the Tamil people have to be respected. The Left and democratic forces, however, must recognise the perils of breaking up a country like Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan unity The solution has to be found by institutionalising regional autonomy within the framework of Sri Lankan unity. The LTTE is now dominant in the Tamil areas. It has eliminated other political forces and intimidated those who remain, into submission. The quest for a separate Tamil Eelam has not given the Tamils justice or equal rights. It has brought great suffering and disruption in the lives of ordinary people. For the last one and a half years, the cessation of hostilities has brought relief to the people, both Tamil and Sinhala, who have lost 64,000 lives in the civil war. The desire for peace is strong and neither the president nor the prime minister can ignore this reality. There is no escape for both Kumaratunga and Wickremesinghe who have reiterated that the peace process should go on. Either they strive for a common front to conduct the negotiations, or early elections will have to be held for parliament to get a fresh mandate.* * * Based on an article by Prakash Karat and published by Ganashakti Newspaper, India