Behind Bush's push for the stars
by Kate Hudson Alarm bells are already ringing over President Bush's latest space plans, with his announcement that the US is going beyond its current vision of world domination to space. This will involve establishing permanent bases on the moon and landing astronauts on Mars. The spin that Bush places on these developments harks back to the idea of bravely pushing the frontiers of space in the noble cause of science and human progress, but behind this supposed "renewed spirit of discovery" is an alarming subtext of both military and commercial interests. Space exploration and rocket technology have always been inextricably linked with missile military development ever since Werner Von Braun and his team took their V2 missile technology from Nazi Germany into the US space program. Part of the new proposals that Bush has outlined is likely to be a nuclear rocket known as Project Prometheus, named after the God of Fire. This would halve the amount of time that it would take to reach Mars, but according to peace activists the project would have military applications as well and is a dangerous, unproven technology. And, according to the organisation Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space, "The military has long eyed the moon as a potential base of operations as warfare is moved into the heavens." Again, this reinforces what we read about in the US strategy document Vision 2000, which refers to "full spectrum military dominance" on land, sea, air and in space. Surely Bush's recent proposals are bringing this horrifying scenario closer than ever. Commercial interests are strongly to the fore here, too. The moon also happens to have an abundant supply of helium-3, an isotope that is rare on the earth and is a possible energy replacement for fossil fuels. As reported in the New York Times in December last year: "When fusion reactors start coming online, lunar entrepreneurs may stand to make the kind of money their predecessors raked in during the gold rush and the oil boom". This potentially adds a whole new terrifying dimension to the notion of resource wars if they are to be carried into space. But attempts have been made to stop space becoming just another commercial and military battleground. For example, the UN introduced the Moon Treaty and the Outer Space Treaty as ways to prevent ownership, exploitation and war fighting beyond our own planet. However, as Leeds Metropolitan University Professor Dave Webb explains, "The US never signed the 1979 Moon Treaty and estate agents are already selling plots of land [on the moon] to US citizens." The question of the costs of these new initiatives is of great concern within the US as the country faces record deficits. The White House claims that the project will not require major spending increases in the short run, but initial estimates of the cost of a mission to Mars suggests around US$1 trillion over the next decade or so. As the organisation Scientists for Global Responsibility argues, such a large sum of money could be put to much better use. "It is larger than the estimated increase in global aid necessary to provide clean water for all, eliminate hunger and malnutrition and provide universal literacy." Few would argue against scientific advance and exploration, but the questions of motives and priorities are crucial. Take for example the US missile defence program. It is clearly contributing to new nuclear arms race and heightening global tensions. As if that isn't bad enough, it also costs nearly US$10 billion a year — the cost of providing clean water for all — with an eventual total cost of over US$1 trillion. We are better informed than ever about what is going on in the world — about the real motivations and interests that lie behind government policies and military strategies. It is absolutely clear what these space developments are about, no matter how they are dressed up. So, let us keep on with our campaigning and keep space for peace and the world for the peaceful fulfilment of real human needs.* * * Kate Hudson is chairwoman of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), Britain.