The Guardian February 11, 2004


Luna Park no fun for residents

Peter Mac

The NSW government has once more pranced into the limelight as 
environmental villain and developers' friend, with its support 
for a planned gross overdevelopment of Sydney's heritage-listed 
Luna Park. The plan has joined a huge list of controversial 
development proposals which the Carr Government has attempted to 
force through, despite fierce public opposition over major 
environmental issues.

The Luna Park site, formerly the steel fabricating yard for the 
Sydney Harbour Bridge, occupies prime harbourside land at 
Milson's Point (on the northern side of the Harbour). Although 
still beloved by Sydneysiders, its fortunes began to wane with 
the advent of television and other forms of entertainment.

The Park was closed after a disastrous fire some 20 years ago. It 
reopened some years later with upgraded facilities. Although its 
financial situation improved, the Park's management, which 
favoured redevelopment of the site, decided to shut it down once 
more.

A series of consultative processes found public opinion 
overwhelmingly in support of preservation of the site with no new 
development. However, the Park's owners have now lodged an 
application for construction of a complex of five cinemas and a 
14-storey building within the Park site.

The proposal would massively violate existing planning 
regulations (the site is zoned for two storeys). It would also 
obscure harbour views, jeopardise the Park's historic fig trees, 
spoil and weaken the adjacent heritage-listed cliff face, rob the 
nearby historic North Sydney Swimming Pool of sunlight, and 
create massive parking problems in an area where parking is 
already almost impossible at times.

The office building as proposed is a good example of the mad 
architectural cult of Big and Ugly. Clearly visible from the 
Bridge and across the harbour, this monstrosity would resemble an 
assembly of huge children's blocks painted white with black 
edges, just to make sure you don't miss them.

As was the case with the hideous proposal for a garbage recycling 
plant in the Sydney suburb of Auburn, it seems that the Carr 
government would be willing to pass a special law to override any 
council decision against construction of the new Luna Park 
development.

The Mayor of North Sydney, Genia McCaffery, commented bitterly: 
"This latest development has the power to take away one of the 
most prized harbour vistas. If the government approves this 
application it will be ignoring planning controls it approved in 
law, in the interests of a developer.

"The kind of intensification of use proposed by this project is 
simply not permitted under the planning controls for Luna Park 
approved by the State government. The Premier's own stated aim of 
preserving the harbour from excessive height — through the 
process of "stepped back" buildings — would be made meaningless 
by approval of this building."

The Carr Government's methods of pushing through major 
development proposals are notorious. They include the passing of 
special laws to override court and council decisions, the 
bypassing of normal government procedures, and the scrapping of 
openness in government.

Ms McCaffery commented: "The development application calls into 
question the tendering process which saw the site's redevelopment 
contract awarded. Selective tendering to three potential bidders 
behind closed doors, based on planning controls that could be 
arbitrarily scrapped if this building is approved, deserves far 
closer scrutiny.

"There was an outcry at Mark Latham's proposal to sell off 
Kirribilli House. Yet a far more stealthy sell-off of public land 
on Sydney Harbour is occurring right under our noses, and only 
the State Government has the power to stop it."

Alas, Ms McCaffery, the government might have the power to do so, 
but they certainly won't have the motivation — as a group, the 
developers are now by far the biggest contributors to the NSW 
ALP's coffers — unless the various concerned groups, trade 
unions and community at large wage a determined, united fight to 
retain the site.

Back to index page