Playing fundamentalist favourites
Jules Andrews Last week Howard warned Australia's church leaders to stay out of "partisan" politics in the upcoming election. The blatant hypocrisy of his plea is instantly identifiable. John Howard has proudly described himself as the most conservative Prime Minister in Australia's history. This social conservatism is based in his fundamentalist belief in Christian supremacy. His continued outspoken support for or condemnation of different church leaders pits faith against faith, congregation against congregation. "I don't deny the right of any church leader to talk about anything", he stated. "But I think, from the point of view of the unity of the church, it stresses and strains when the only time they [congregation] hear from their leaders is when they are talking about issues that are bound to divide their congregations." " [when] some of the church leaders have been particularly critical of our side of politics, they [can] end up offending a large number of their patrons." When we look at that last paragraph, and substitute the negative for the positive, we get a clearer picture of Howard's exhortation: " when most of the church leaders are particularly supportive of our side of politics, they will likely be supported by a large number of their patrons." Mr Howard's fundamentalism has left him so myopic he assumes that by definition all Christians are fundamentalists and that outspoken progressive leaders are not speaking on behalf of their congregations and so risk alienating them. How kind of him to offer such an insight. Playing the "family" card Throughout the whole of Mr Howard's time as Prime Minister he has stood side-by-side with, and sought counsel and support from, Christian fundamentalists who are outspoken in support of his policies. In particular, Howard laps up praise from religious leaders for his "defence of the family" policies, by which he means the weakening of sex anti-discrimination legislation, opposing abortion, opposition to stem-cell research, and against recognition of gay relationships. In 2003 Mr Howard said, "Traditional marriage is one of the bedrock institutions of our society and I don't want anything to occur that weakens it. Marriage, as we understand it in our society, is about children, having children, raising them, providing for the survival of the species." To which the President of the NSW Council of Churches, the Reverend Chris Moroney, responded warmly: "This statement from our Prime Minister shows that he is supportive of the traditional views of marriage and the family that are the basis on which our society has been built and which guarantee its survival. It is encouraging for the churches to see this unambiguous stand from the political leaders of this nation." Yet when these very same "family values" are used often by the very same religious leaders to criticise Mr Howard's policies they are condemned as "sounding very partisan". Numerous Christian faiths have taken Mr Howard and his Government to task over his anti-family policies on welfare, Indigenous rights and refugees. "Cheap headlines" When churches helped organise and participated en masse in last year's anti-war demonstrations they became part of Mr Howard's reviled "mob". Anglican Primate, Dr Peter Carnley, suggested last year that the terrorist attack against Australians in Bali was in response to Australia's outspoken support for the United States and particularly its preparedness "to take unilateral action against Iraq." Foreign Minister Alexander Downer came in swinging: "Here was the head of my own church blaming the Australian Government for bombing incidents in which so many of our people were killed or terribly injured". "It was a stark reminder of the tendency of some church leaders to ignore their primary pastoral obligations in favour of hogging the limelight on complex political issues " Downer continued: "I will always defend the right of the Churches to enter the political debates of our time. "But they have special responsibilities . Too often, it seems to me, the Churches seek popular political causes or cheap headlines". Mr Downer is clearly saying "Join in the political debate when you agree with the Government, butt out when you don't". The Lyons' den It is no secret that Howard leads a Government stacked with members of the conservative right-wing Christian faction "The Lyons Forum". While Mr Howard is not officially a member of the Forum, a quick check of his front bench indicate where his loyalties lie. Lyons members include Tony Abbott, Peter Costello, Alexander Downer, David Kemp, Warren Truss, Eric Abetz, Nick Minchin; and prominent former ministers John Herron and Jocelyn Newman. The Government's policies on sex discrimination legislation, abortion, stem-cell research, euthanasia and homosexuality are dictated by the Lyons Forum Charter. While Mr Howard goes to some trouble to hide his fundamentalist outlook, comments by his fellow travellers leave us in no doubt. The helpful Mr Downer again: "We're sincere about the faith that nurtured Western Civilisation. It's because of our beliefs that we tend to see public life as a vocation a calling" In short: "We have been called by God to mould Australian society, and our policies have His blessing". Ultra-right-wing fundamentalist, the Reverend Fred Nile, has no trouble identifying his allies: "We congratulate Prime Minister John Howard on his outstanding victory and his re-election as Prime Minister. "Now John Howard and his government can continue to lead Australia as a caring, Christian nation, whilst strengthening our Christian heritage, Christian values and the God-given unit of the family, ensuring the future of Australia as a united nation under Almighty God." People in high places Mr Howard's appointment of Brisbane Archbishop Peter Hollingworth to the post of Governor General has been treated to the glare of the public spotlight. What is little known is that Peter Hollingworth did not resign as Archbishop to take up the Governor General post, he merely stepped aside from the church post for the duration of his secular one. Despite all Mr Howard's protestations to the contrary Australia, technically, had an ordained Anglican Archbishop as head of state. In the welfare field, the extremely conservative Major Brian Watters from the Salvation Army has been appointed as chairman of the Australian National Council on Drugs. Mr Watters' fanaticism on the issue even extends to a "zero tolerance" approach to alcohol. It has been under Major Watters counsel that John Howard has instituted his "war on drugs" policy. This black-and-white policy has resulted in an "abstinence or jail" outcome for addicts. Such a narrow view fails, conveniently, to recognise the fundamentals of drug addiction: lack of education, lack of health care, poverty, unemployment and homelessness all of which have become hallmarks of Mr Howard's reign. John Howard has not just blurred the line between church and state, it is his stated mission to promote and impose his own religious views on the Australian public using the power at his disposal through the state apparatus. Nonetheless, by hand-picking and promoting his fundamentalist favourites Cardinal Pell, Archbishops Jensen and Hollingworth, Reverends Fred Nile and Gordon Moyes, and Major Brian Watters and dismissing, attacking and denigrating religious leaders who speak against him, Howard is fuelling a new religious schism, just has his reactionary government has sharpened the contradictions and widened the inequalities in our class-divided society.