Racism behind ATSIC abolition
Tom Pearson With the proposed abolition of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) the Howard Government has reached a racist milestone in its policies of assimilation and dispossession of Indigenous Australians. The peak national body with its elected representatives has been a high priority target of the Government. The legislation will be introduced in Parliament next month. It was one year ago that the Government set up an agency to gut ATSIC. Its staff was cut from 1300 to 20, with those remaining moved to a new board run by Wayne Gibbons, a government-appointed chief executive officer. Gibbons was invested with absolute authority through this new executive agency, called Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Services. As such he replaced ATSIC's 18 elected board members and 400 elected regional councillors. The coup was executed ahead of a $1 million government- commissioned review into ATSIC: the review found that ATSIC functioned well and was important to Aboriginal people. Under this final part of the Government's plan the board members will be now displaced by an advisory group of "eminent Indigenous people" appointed by the Indigenous Affairs Minister Amanda Vanstone on July 1 this year. Regional councils are to be scrapped by July, 2005. As ATSIC commissioner Rick Griffiths put it: "Howard's Cabinet represents a black-armband, mean, narrow-minded, self-serving Government whose members just cannot come to terms with the notion of Aboriginal self-determination." The Government put a lot of time in portraying ATSIC as the ultimate expression of Indigenous self-determination. It then undermined the organisation's ability to carry out its tasks and demonised its leaders through character assassination so that it could tear down ATSIC and declare Indigenous rights to be dead and buried. Thus, in announcing the organisation's abolition Howard described "separate elected representation for Indigenous people" as a "failed experiment". The word "separate" is pivotal to the Government's racist agenda, as was soon revealed when Minister Vanstone compared ATSIC to apartheid South Africa. ATSIC delivered ATSIC leaders Ray Robinson and Geoff Clark pointed out in a statement last year that, despite having been in existence for just 12 years, ATSIC delivered more to Indigenous people than any government, federal, state or territory in 200 years of colonial rule. As part of the drive to discredit it, ATSIC has been blamed by the Government (with the co-operation of the mass media) for not delivering Indigenous communities out of third world conditions. But ATSIC is not responsible for the provision of essential services, such as health, housing, education and employment, even though it has programs in some of these areas. These are the responsibility of state and federal governments. ATSIC was forced to provide supplementary funding in these areas because of the failure of governments to meet their responsibilities. With the destruction of ATSIC recognition of the special needs of Indigenous people is to be wiped. The Howard Government plans to mainstream all essential services to Aboriginal communities. Noting that most countries have realised that mainstreaming does not work, the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO) asked why Australia has not learned those lessons. "Why do we want to turn the clock back 40 years?", asked NACCHO Chairman Tony McCartney. NACCHO is urging Parliamentarians to realise that Aboriginal community-controlled advisory mechanisms have to be maintained in improving health, education and economic opportunities. "These are life and death decisions." The Government also intends to dismantle the Aboriginal Legal Service (ALS) by contracting out its work to private companies in a bidding war for a $122 million, two-year contract. The bidder granted the contract will not be required to employ Indigenous staff or to be an Indigenous organisation. Further, under the plan an Aboriginal person who has one prior conviction for a violent crime can be refused legal aid by the new contractor. This will lead to an even greater number of Indigenous people in prisons and increased Aboriginal deaths in custody. People charged with trivial offences such as drunkenness and traffic violations, would no longer be represented, increasing the Indigenous jail population. The contractor will be also be required to shift its priority from criminal cases, which make up the overwhelming majority of the ASL's cases, to child welfare and family violence matters. A means test will also be introduced. Vanstone calls this "ensuring that Indigenous people get value for money". The Principal Lawyer for the Central Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service, David Bamber, said the proposals will have serious implications. "The major point is that provision of legal services could not be profitable without a major reduction of service", he warned. "The introduction of means testing and reduction of the number of types of matters for which aid is granted, services such as our after-hours services, a lot of our field services and services to the bush, would surely be cut."