Victorian nurses on warpath
Peter Mac The Bracks Labor Government is hardly carving a name for itself as a friend of the Victorian working people. Hard on the heels of their offer to big business of $400 million in tax breaks and infrastructure funding, the government has introduced new legislation to forbid strike action on projects deemed to be an essential service or industry, or a vital state construction project. One group that is not about to take this sort of treatment meekly is the state's nurses, who last week took strike action over their claim for a 24 percent increase in pay and the maintenance of the nurse/patient ratio. Victoria's nurses are among the lowest paid in any state. Graduate nurses are the lowest-paid in the nation, and are also the lowest-paid health professionals. They have also been for many years among the hardest worked nurses in Australia. However, three years ago they achieved a world-first in their working conditions — the establishment of a minimum 5:20 nurse/patient ratio. Ms Lisa Fitzpartick, the secretary of the Victorian branch of the Australian Nurses Federation (ANF), commented: "Victoria is the only state with ratios and the only state that doesn't have a severe nurse shortage." The ANF has pointed out that: * Before ratios were introduced, about 400 public hospital beds were closed on any given day. * Since ratios were introduced an additional 3300 nurses have returned to the public health system. * Ratios mandate a safe minimum number of nurses per ward. * Patient dependency systems that tell management more nurses were needed for the previous shift or that there were not enough nurses are useless. * Ratios ensure that there are adequate numbers of nurses on roster six weeks in advance. * Ratios help management break its reliance on expensive nursing agencies to fill permanent vacancies rather than unplanned vacancies. * Victoria has proven that ratios mean safe patient care and the ability to recruit and retain nurses during a global nursing shortage. However, the government has now taken action to remove this crucial working condition. They have also taken action to replace qualified nursing staff with untrained personnel in the care of elderly and vulnerable residents of public aged care beds, and to abolish the requirement for directors of nursing at regional hospitals and hospital campuses. As a result, last week the nurses began their industrial action, which will affect public hospitals, operating theatres and blood banks. The government had previously responded to their demands with a contemptuous offer of a three percent pay rise — and the "promise" of a new computer system that would direct nurses to wards where the patient demand was highest! The computer system has been widely criticised by nurses as consistently underestimating the nursing time each patient needs, and therefore compromising patient care and safety. Use of the system to determine the level of care means in effect that the level of care received by the patient is determined by a computer, whose parameters are in turn predetermined by a programmer who is not present, and can have no idea of the time actually needed for individual patient care. The system also allows for unlimited short shifts of varying duration during which nurses would be required to work frantic shifts of between two and six hours at a time. Not surprisingly, nurses rejected the government's "offer". Representing a government that is fast gaining a reputation as an industrial bully, State Health Minister Bronwyn Pike declared petulantly: "It's clear the union has gone in much too early and much too hard." This was pretty rich, considering that negotiations have been dragging on for five months, with the government stonewalling every inch of the way. The matter is now before the Industrial Relations Commission. The nurses have indicated that they are willing to negotiate on the wages issue, but that the issue of retention of the nurse/patient ratio is absolutely non-negotiable.