Open letter to Attorney-General on Torture Convention
Dear Mr Ruddock Could you please explain: 1. The legal basis of Australia's participation in the war on Iraq, given that 43 Australian experts in international law and human rights legislation issued a declaration on February 26, 2003 that an invasion of Iraq would be an open breach of international law and a crime against humanity, even if it took place with the authorisation of the UN Security Council. 2. What are the government's current preparations for the possibility that the Howard Government and Australian military personnel may be liable for prosecution in the International Criminal Court? This was the legal opinion of the experts cited above. 3. What is the extent, definition and legal basis of the jurisdiction the US exercises in Iraq. 4. What is the extent, definition and legal basis of Australia's jurisdiction in Iraq as a member of the Coalition of the Willing. 5. Why the US and only about half the Coalition of the Willing have ratified the Convention Against Torture (CAT)? 6. What steps the Howard Government is taking to enhance ratification of the CAT particularly by our ANZUS ally the US and particularly in light of the 1800 photos and video clips showing the most appalling torture and inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners? The following italicised quotations are from the CAT. 7. Each State Party shall ensure that education and information regarding the prohibition against torture are fully included in the training of law enforcement personnel, civil or military, medical personnel, public officials and other persons who may be involved in the custody, interrogation or treatment of any individual subjected to any form of arrest, detention or imprisonment. (Article 10.1) Has the Howard Government ensured that the education of all Australian personnel in the specified categories complies with this requirement? 8. Each State Party shall include this prohibition in the rules or instructions issued in regard to the duties and functions of any such persons. (Article 10.2) Has the Howard Government ensured compliance with this requirement? 9. Each State Party shall keep under systematic review interrogation rules, instructions, methods and practices as well as arrangements for the custody and treatment of persons subjected to any form of arrest, detention or imprisonment in any territory under its jurisdiction, with a view to preventing any cases of torture. (Article 11) Given that the US, unlike Australia, has not ratified the CAT, how can the Howard Government fulfil its legal obligation under Article 11? Will the Howard government make it a pre-condition that, before Australian military personnel transfer Iraqi prisoners to the custody of US military forces, the US ratify the CAT? 10. Each State Party shall ensure in its legal system that the victim of an act of torture obtains redress and has an enforceable right to fair and adequate compensation including the means for as full rehabilitation as possible. In the event of the death of the victim as a result of an act of torture, his dependents shall be entitled to compensation. (Article 14.1) 11. In what ways is the Howard government implementing this requirement? Yours sincerely Gareth W R Smith 16 May 2004