TV programs worth watching
Sun 27 June — Sat 3 July
Only one program in this week's Worth Watching. The reason will become clear as you read. Back to the normal format next week. Very few people these days read history books for pleasure. Most people get their understanding of history from TV. For their part, most television programs on historical themes are put together by TV producers, not historians. Popularity is ultimately more important to them than whether the interpretation they are presenting is correct. Even historical programs fronted by a specific historian are deformed by this need to sublimate the content to ratings. An historian who advances an unpopular point of view is not going to get his or her own program. An historian who declared that the Soviet Union made the biggest contribution to Allied victory in WW2, in fact a bigger contribution than all the other Allies put together, would be hastily labelled a crank and a crackpot. A series of his or her own would not be an option. Why? Because the "free press", the "unfettered media", that capitalism always brags about is in fact not free at all. The more popular or effective a form of media is, the more tightly the capitalist system will want to control it. Television, the most powerful and effective medium of all, is very tightly controlled, whether it is in private or public hands. Capitalism makes sure that TV does not produce programs exposing the many ways workers are exploited by the ruling class (would make a great series, though, wouldn't it?). Nor does it tolerate programs that show ordinary people uniting in struggle to improve their working conditions, get better housing or secure a bigger share of the wealth they produce. And just as rigorously, the capitalists make sure that TV presents their version of history. This is a history that ignores or distorts class struggle; that eulogises leading capitalists; that falsifies the causes of war, laying the blame anywhere but at its own doorstep; and that seeks to consign the victories of the working class to oblivion. The successes of the working class are treated as achievements of the ruling class instead, or simply ignored, rendering them effectively non-existent. To help with this obfuscation, excessive amounts of time and space are given to alternative events in which the ruling class was prominent. In time, the alternative events are the only ones people will remember, for they are the only ones on view. Almost all aspects of the Second World War have been given this treatment for several decades now. Whether it is the causes of the War, those responsible, the Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal, the Resistance movement, or the course of the War itself, the historical account presented for popular consumption has been consistently distorted and misrepresented. Every year the lies grow bigger and the truth recedes further. Even the millions of victims of Nazi genocide are subject to this evil skewing of history, concentrating on one tragic group to the exclusion of an even larger group, so that more than half the victims of the Nazi death camps are totally ignored. To get a good, reliable depiction of the Second World War it is helpful to go to works produced near — or immediately after — the end of it, before Churchill and Truman's Cold War had been able to overcome the positive attitudes of the Anti-Fascist Alliance. In fact, one of the best compilation documentaries ever made was the 1945 Anglo-US film The True Glory by Garson Kanin and Carol Reed. The True Glory was distinguished by two things: it used the voices of actual soldiers to provide the "commentary", and it struck everyone with its humanity and honesty. It was, and probably remains, the most popular compilation film on WW2. I saw it in the early '60s, and I remember in particular the scene near the end where the Yanks reach the Elbe River and are greeted by Soviet troops with a huge banner: "Greetings to the Heroes' Army of the Unites States of America!". An American soldier's voice comes on the soundtrack saying in awed tones: "Gee, we did pretty well, but I'd hate to think where we'd have been without them!" Can you imagine a modern day US documentary feature putting forward that sentiment? Certainly you won't find it in D-Day To Berlin on As It Happened (SBS 7.30pm Saturdays). A three-part BBC compilation, D-Day To Berlin covers the same ground as Kanin and Reed's film but from a significantly different perspective. In fact, since Kanin and Reed's film was compiled from newsreel footage, it is quite likely that some of the identical footage will appear in the new film. D-Day To Berlin views D-Day (and the subsequent ten months as the Anglo-US troops advanced eastwards into Germany) as an event "that changed the course of European life forever", even as — would you believe? — "the defining drama of the Second World War". Like the older film, D-Day To Berlin also uses the powerful testimonies of those who took part. But it must be said, without in any way wishing to belittle the courage, determination and suffering of the men who fought their way across Western Europe, D-Day was not the main event. That was over in the East. Most of the German armour, most of the German guns, most of Germany's airforce and most of the German army were confronting the Soviet army. The leaders of Britain and France had promised to open a Second Front in Western Europe in 1942, but continually reneged on the agreement in subsequent years while they held secret peace negotiations with Germany (excluding the USSR). As I said a couple of weeks ago: despite public demonstrations in support of opening a second front, the capitalist powers only went ahead with it when it had become clear that the USSR would otherwise liberate Europe single-handed. It was essentially a political — rather than a military — operation. But capitalism's propagandists are being encouraged to make it out to be not only "one of the greatest-ever military offensives", but the military conflict of the European theatre. Young people in every capitalist country are being assiduously taught that the US and Britain, by means of the D-Day landings, defeated Germany. It's untrue, it's immoral and it's an insult to the millions of Soviet troops who died to defeat Hitlerite fascism.