Quarantine and "free trade" — the plot thickens
Bob Briton You have got to hand it to John Howard. His training in the law and decades of surviving in the snake pit called the Australian Parliament have made him the master of the carefully chosen word. Earlier this year the PM was under a lot of political pressure over the threat the Australia US Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) posed to Australia's strict quarantine laws. The US's lead negotiator Bob Zoellick had made it clear that a "relaxation" of the quarantine laws was a prerequisite for the conclusion of the pro-corporate AUSFTA. The questions about this crucial issue were raining down on Howard. "Australia's quarantine and food safety regimes, which ensure our health and our environment are protected, are not affected by the Agreement", the PM said with his chin thrusting forward. Since then, however, there has been a host of challenges to the effectiveness of Australia's quarantine regulations. In all of them, the agency of the Federal Government overseeing quarantine matters — Biosecurity Australia (BA) — has favoured "relaxing" current standards. In February, BA recommended the scrapping of the current system of quarantine inspections at entry points to the country. This would be replaced by a system of "assurances" from the countries of origin that the produce being imported does not present any disease threat. A shakier system of "enforcement" could not be imagined. That same month, a BA report recommended that bananas from the Philippines be allowed into the country despite the existence there of Moko, a disease that could devastate Australia's $400 million banana industry. Apparently, "assurances" that the imported bananas came from disease-free plantations would have been sufficient for BA. Growers now live in fear that Moko and banana bract mosaic virus could one day find their way into their crops with devastating consequences. The Australian Banana Growers' Council had engaged a senior scientist from Britain's Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to examine the dangers of the imports. The Council says it has evidence that BA approached the professor's bosses in the UK to force him to drop his investigations. Another BA risk analysis recommended the lifting of the ban on pig meat from 11 countries currently in place to prevent the entry of post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome. The potential for damage to producers is so grave that industry body Australian Pork Ltd is mounting a Federal Court challenge to the proposed change. Then came the most widely reported recommendation from Biosecurity Australia. A draft report recommended that a ban on apples from New Zealand should be lifted to allow for their import "under strict quarantine conditions". BA has either a thick hide or a devilish sense of humour to suggest this in light of what it had previously proposed with regard to our system of quarantine inspection. The ban on NZ apples has stood since 1919 because of the potential for contamination of local crops with fire blight. The disease could permanently reduce production to 60 per cent of current levels and destroy the viability of fruit growing areas like the Goulburn Valley. It has already wiped out NZ's pear growing industry. Fire blight is spread by bees, aphids, leafhoppers and other sucking insects and birds. It can also be passed on by contaminated farm implements. An outbreak is the cue for a military-style mobilisation. Last week's Vanguard carried a report from a consultant in fruit production in the US who has witnessed outbreaks firsthand: "When fire blight struck, everybody was mobilised. An army of orchard workers moved systematically through every pear and apple block, cutting out affected branches — sometimes whole limbs — which were subsequently burned. "Every affected tree was marked and re-examined several times during the next few days. In the meantime, the whole orchard was sprayed with the anti-biotic streptomycin. In bad cases the orchard was also dusted with copper causing severe russet of the fruit. "I remember driving past a beurre bosc pear orchard in the state of Washington that was badly affected by fire blight. The trees were cut down a week later and the same orchard resembled a cemetery, with only the trunks left as tombstones. This hardly describes the anguish and frustration orchardists will feel when fire blight hits pear and apple orchards in Australia." Biosecurity Australia argues that it merely applies a mathematical formula to assess risk. It accepts that some Philippine bananas carrying Moko will enter the country. Using this same "qualitative" yardstick, it is conceded that between 0.35 and 5 per cent of the 200 million apples set to come from NZ could carry fire blight bacteria. This is acceptable to the Federal Government's panel of experts! Controversy over BA's draft report has remained in the news since its release. A Senate Committee has been reviewing it and has heard some remarkable evidence. John Corboy of the apple and pear industry's fire blight task force has identified 46 errors in the figures contained in the report. The term "low" was used to describe risk when it should have read "moderate". Biosecurity Australia chief Mary Harwood is standing by the report. Errors and all, the recommendation for a "relaxation" of our quarantine standards still stands. Meanwhile, the European Union is reported to be challenging Australia's quarantine system for being too restrictive. New Zealand is going to take the apple and pear issue to the World Trade Organisation. In all these actions, it appears that the Federal Government will be on the opposite side to local growers. It has its own agenda. The fate of the sugar industry during the US Free Trade Agreement negotiations has already demonstrated that it is prepared to abandon large industries supporting large numbers of people to get in the good books in Washington. Howard will have a battle on his hands. Rallies of 10,000 people have taken place in the Victorian town of Shepparton. More actions are planned. The support of the broader labour movement to stop this attack on the Australia's much envied quarantine safeguards and the livelihoods of people in fruit growing areas is absolutely vital.