Massive theft of Native land
John Gallagher USA: The "Western Shoshone Distribution Bill" has passed both houses of Congress and is on its way to the Bush administration for signature. The bill would authorise a payout to the Western Shoshone Indian people of approximately 15 cents an acre for tens of millions of acres of disputed lands in Nevada, Idaho, Utah and California. A majority of tribal councils, representing approximately 80 percent of the population, and the Western Shoshone National Council, strongly oppose the measure. The National Congress of American Indians, Amnesty International, Oxfam America, and the Petra Foundation have also denounced the bill. At stake are 60 million acres of Western Shoshone land recognised by the 1863 Treaty of Ruby Valley. Competing with Western Shoshone interests are corporations seeking billions of dollars in profits from gold, energy production, nuclear waste storage and weapons industries. The land produces two-thirds of the gold in the US, making it the third largest gold-producing area in the world behind South Africa and Australia. At a House Resources Committee hearing a year ago, Interior Department officials testified that "vast majority" of Western Shoshones favour distribution of the money. Democratic Representative Tom Udall of New Mexico responded to this testimony by requesting "for the record" whatever documentation Interior had used as the basis for its testimony. Ten months later, Interior has still not honoured Udall's request. Such stonewalling leads to at least two questions. What is the Interior Department hiding? What did it base its testimony upon? This push is being made at the same time that the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste repository is being pushed along, which would open up Shoshone lands to privatisation by multinational mining companies and massive geothermal energy development with no provision for Western Shoshone interests or concerns. Additionally, notices of intent to impound livestock have been received by Western Shoshone grandmothers Mary and Carrie Dann and other Western Shoshone ranchers. Dehumanised Carrie Dann said it is domestic terrorism designed to steal the dignity of the people. "Economically we were a self-sustaining people. With these recent actions stealing our livelihood we are now facing economic starvation designed to remove us from our lands. "To me, that is terrorism. Domestic terrorism. This behaviour is designed to steal our dignity, our honour, and to make us feel that we are less than or lower than human — we are treated like animals. We are being dehumanised." Dann said the distribution bill is an unconstitutional, unjust and unwanted payment. "To take this land from us will be to lead us into a spiritual death." Last year, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, in its final report on the case of Dann v US, found that with regard to the Western Shoshone, the US is currently in violation of rights to property, due process and equality under the law. It is the first judicial review of the United States law and policy regarding Indigenous peoples within its borders. Julie Fishel, attorney for the Western Shoshone Defense Project, said the United States does not want American Indians to learn about the ruling. In a November 2003 letter sent to Secretary of Interior Gale Norton, Congressman Raul Grijalva raised serious concerns about the real intent of the Distribution bill and the involvement of the federal government and mining, energy and nuclear industries in presenting a misleading picture of the issues to the public and to members of Congress. In the letter he raises concerns that the bill may be contrary to federal policies with regard to treatment of Native Americans and may conflict with the Interior Department's position as trustee and its obligation to uphold the laws of the United States. A copy of the letter and more information on the bill is available on the Western Shoshone Defense Project's website at http://www.wsdp.org* * * People's Weekly World