The Guardian July 21, 2004


Nanotechnology — private profit vs public protection

On June 17-18, the first inter-governmental dialogue on 
"Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology" was 
convened in Washington with representatives from 26 countries. In 
his introductory remarks, Mike Roco of the US Government's 
National Science Foundation explained that the meeting was 
dedicated to the examination of broad societal issues that cannot 
be addressed by any single country. Roco asked: "How can we 
prepare our world for the emergence of nanotechnology?"

Nanotechnology refers to a spectrum of new technologies involving 
the manipulation of matter at the scale of atoms and molecules — 
the nanoscale. A nanometre is one-billionth of a metre.

"Ironically, governments are talking about the need to be pro-
active, failing to admit that they're at least one decade late: 
nanotech products are already commercially available and 
laboratory workers and consumers are already being exposed to 
nanoparticles that could pose serious risks to people and the 
environment", said Pat Mooney, Executive Director of ETC Group in 
Ottawa.

Already on the market

An unofficial document generated by the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) lists well over 100 commercial products based on 
nanotechnologies (available at 
www.etcgroup.org/documents/nanoproducts_EPA.pdf).

These are already on the market or soon will be. They include a 
vast range of uses such as: stain-resistant fabrics for clothing 
and bedding, cosmetics and sunscreens, tennis balls and racquets, 
bowling balls, odour-eating socks, time-release perfumed fabrics, 
paints, capsules carrying haemoglobin (under development), 
sensors to test water impurities, sprayable vitamins, 
nanoparticle water purifiers, ski wax, 4-wheel drive turrets, 
long-lasting paper, nanotubes for flat panel display screens, 
artificial silicon retinas, drug delivery systems, flash memory 
devices, diagnostic agents for use in MRI scans.

The US Government estimates that one million new workers will be 
employed in nanotech-related industries within the next decade 
and the global nanotech market is expected to tip $1 trillion in 
just seven years.

As a science nanotechnology is in its infancy, but the claims 
about its potential are almost the stuff of science fiction.

One of the most promising and also worrying aspects of this 
technology lies in the changes that take place to the properties 
of a substance when reduced to nanoparticles. A reduction in size 
— with no change in substance — can make a substance stronger 
or more reactive or lighter or more water-soluble or more heat-
resistant or a better conductor of electricity. The engineering 
of nanoparticles can also bring about significant changes in the 
properties of a substance.

Property changes begin to happen with materials 100 nanometres or 
smaller. It is these "quantum effects" that make nanoscale 
materials interesting to scientists and potentially profitable to 
industry, who are taking advantage of unique property changes in 
order to create new products and new markets.

Manipulation of matter at the nanoscale and its control (through 
wealth and patents) could increase the power and domination of 
the largest transnational corporations over industrial 
manufacturing, food, agriculture and health in the 21st century.

However, propelled by venture capital and taxpayer dollars, the 
field of nanobiotech is advancing rapidly without public debate 
or regulatory oversight. For most government policymakers, the 
implications of nanobiotech are not even on the radar.

In recent months, governments in the USA and Europe have 
reluctantly conceded that current safety and health regulations 
may not be adequate to address the special exigencies of 
nanoscale materials. Though it is often the case that the 
substances themselves have been well studied and some controls 
put in place at larger scales, they have not been similarly 
vetted at the nanoscale.

It should be no surprise that toxicity is one property that can 
change with a reduction in size: a chemical compound at the 
micro-scale — titanium dioxide (TiO2), for example — may be 
benign, but a nanoparticle of that same TiO2 could be toxic.

From the few toxicological data that exist, it seems that a 
particle's size, shape, surface chemistry and composition can all 
contribute to a changed level of toxicity at the nanoscale. There 
are no labelling requirements for nanoparticles nor is special 
toxicity assessment required.

Green Goo

Green goo refers to potential dangers associated with 
nanobiotechnology. Nanobiotechnology involves the merging of the 
living and non-living realms — biological materials with 
synthetic materials — at the nanoscale to make hybrid materials 
and organisms, to build new molecular structures or products.

This raises many potential concerns: will new life forms, 
especially those that are designed to function autonomously in 
the environment, open a Pandora's box of unforeseen and 
uncontrollable consequences?

Researchers are coaxing living organisms to perform mechanical 
functions precisely because living organisms are capable of self-
assembly and self-replication. With nanobiotech, researchers have 
the power to create completely new organisms that have never 
existed on Earth.

Angela Belcher, Professor of Material Science at MIT, reported 
earlier this year that her research team has genetically 
engineered the DNA of viruses and induced them to produce 
inorganic materials in the form of tiny wires with magnetic and 
semiconducting properties.

"Don't build a factory. Get a virus to do the work for you", says 
Ms Belcher. "We programmed the virus to grow a particular 
material at a particular length. Then we burned off the virus and 
were left with single-crystal semiconductor wires." Belcher 
refers to her viruses as "a genetic tool kit for growing and 
organizing nanowires."

Belcher has so far induced viruses to grow roughly 30 different 
inorganic materials, and she plans to work her way through the 
entire periodic table.

It is important to acknowledge that nanobiotechnology does not 
always involve self-replication, and biological materials can be 
harnessed for more mundane applications.

Occupational Health & Safety

"Currently, the toxicological studies of engineered nanomaterials 
can be counted on one hand, and more ambitious risk assessments 
are at least several years away", was the warning given to the 
European Commission by Vicki Colvin, Associate Professor and 
Executive Director of the Center for Biological and Environmental 
Nanotechnology.

A further warning was issued by the world's second largest re-
insurer, Swiss Re in a report, Nanotechnology: Small Matter, many 
unknowns. The report strongly recommended that the precautionary 
principle "be applied whatever the difficulties" and that "no 
reasonable expense should be spared in clarifying the current 
uncertainties associated with nanotechnological risks".

The US National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health 
(NIOSH) announced it was preparing a "best practices" document 
for working with nanomaterials. "Very little is known currently 
about how dangerous nanomaterials are, or how we should protect 
workers in related industries.

"Research over the past few years finds that nano-diameter 
particles are more toxic than larger particles on a mass basis. 
The combination of particle size, unique structures, and unique 
physical and chemical properties, suggests that a great deal of 
care needs to be taken to ensure adequate worker protection when 
manufacturing and using nanomaterials."

The agency estimates that one million new US workers will be 
employed in nanotech-related industries within the next decade.

"Materials and devices [that] are under development are so far 
from our current understanding that we can not easily apply 
existing paradigms to protecting workers", says the NIOSH.

Carbon nanotubes are straw-shaped molecules of pure carbon 
discovered by Sumio Iijima of Japan in 1991.

They have been dubbed the "miracle molecule" because they are 100 
times stronger than steel and six times lighter. Nanotubes can be 
as small as 1 nanometre (nm) in diameter and as long as 100,000 
nm. They can be single-walled, like straws, or they can be multi-
walled, resembling posters in a mailing tube. Depending on how 
they are configured, they can act as semiconductors or as 
conductors.

There are an estimated 16 major producers of carbon nanotubes 
worldwide. The global market for carbon nanotubes was estimated 
at $12 million in 2002, but was expected to have grown to $430 
million by 2004.

Two Japanese companies have plans to produce 40 tonnes of 
nanotubes this year with Carbon Nanotech Research Institute 
aiming for an annual production of 120 tonnes. In the USA, Carbon 
Nanotechnologies, Inc. has plans for a new plant that will 
produce between 150 and 300 tonnes per year.

Electronics giant NEC plans to start selling nanotube fuel cells 
for laptops and mobile phones within a year and nanotube flat 
screen displays shortly thereafter.

Because nanotubes have a high aspect ratio (i.e., they are 
needle-like in shape), there was some speculation initially that 
they could behave like asbestos fibers if they became airborne 
and were inhaled. Until this year, there existed only one 
published study addressing the issue of carbon nanotube toxicity: 
researchers at the University of Warsaw concluded, after a four-
week trial in which nanotubes had been injected into the tracheas 
of guinea pigs, that working with nanotubes was "unlikely to be 
associated with any health risk".

A second nanotube toxicity study at the Johnson Space Center, 
NASA, got underway last year. Hardly had the NASA researchers 
begun when the Financial Times pre-emptively (and mistakenly) 
assured its readers that the soon-to-be-released NASA study would 
give nanotubes its second clean bill of health.

Rather than declaring carbon nanotubes safe, the researchers 
warned that the carbon tubes they tested (three different kinds) 
were more toxic than quartz dust — the material that causes 
silicosis among miners and railroad workers.

One of the researchers recently told New Scientist, "The message 
is clear. People should take precautions. Nanotubes can be highly 
toxic."

* * *
Next Week: part 2 looks at the uses of nanotech in food, agriculture, the patenting of life and some of the issues arising from these developments. This article is compiled from material from ETC — the Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (formerly RAFI) — which is an international non-government organisation headquartered in Canada. ETC is dedicated to the advancement of cultural and ecological diversity and human rights. http://www.etcgroup.org.

Back to index page