Readers are invited to submit letters to The Guardian.
Letters may be e-mailed to guardian@cpa.org.au.
Letters of 300-400 words are preferred.
Letters to the Editor:
If we don't fight we lose!
In last week's Guardian, Editor Anna Pha highlights the very dangerous decision handed down by the High Court on September 2. The decision involves union claims for bargaining fees to be charged to free loaders who enjoy union benefits in the workplace. This dispute goes back to 2001 when several unions negotiated a new enterprise agreement with Electrolux. The log of claims included a fee to be paid by non-union members for the right to enjoy benefits hard won and negotiated for by the unions. The case was taken by employer groups to the Federal court where it found in favour of the unions. At that time letters to the editor in The Guardian and the general press discussed the issue of bargaining fees. At that time it was thought that bargaining fees could be dangerous for unions that use the servicing model as a way of building the union movement. It was also highlighted at that time that unions needed to involve members in the organising and building of unions. The key task and role of unions was to organise the workplace to minimise the number of free loaders. Since the coalition took office, working conditions and the right of workers to organise had been eroded. The introduction of right-wing legislation like the Workplace Relations Act and further amendments have made it legal for employer groups and the government to savage hard won conditions. Anna's analysis of the recent court decision is in my opinion a serious warning for the Trade Union Movement in the country. Her views that somehow the Act must be defeated should be taken seriously by progressive forces and the unions. The only way to defeat the Act is by the trade union movement taking action pressing a new government to repeal these draconian laws. The pressure should be now on the ALP to commit itself in the case of winning the federal elections on October 9 to deliver a more democratic industrial relations law. Smaller political parties, in particular the Greens and other progressive forces should join the claim for the repeal of the Act. As it was shown during the MUA dispute and more recently with the Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, the attacks on workers have been up-front. Class struggle in which the owners of capital will not rest until they see working class organisations destroyed. If we do not fight we lose! V Molina
Perth, WA
This letter has been written in response to another letter written in a previous issue of The Guardian called "Schools in need" [August 25] and also to point out how ignorant some of today's youth are. The first thing I'd like to say is I too am a student in Duncraig Senior High School and that I agree Duncraig is in bad shape but some of it has been exaggerated. Some of the staff complain about the conditions in the school as well and that the government doesn't give enough money for public schools. Another point I'd like to address is how the administration does not give the students much say with what happens with the funding and doesn't really allow students to express their political beliefs. Even though we have a student council they too don't really have much of a say as the two "dominant" councillors put down most of them. They don't do much that benefit the other students only them and their friends, for example when they organise a school event they don't use the other councillors' ideas only theirs. How do I know all this, my friend is apart of that council and he has complained about it to me and feels the same way I do about the school. When he tries to bring up important issues with them they just ignore him or tell him that his idea is "stupid". The other issue I'd like to address is how ignorant today's youth are. I've been trying to get students to sign a petition to allow us to have more say with what happens with the funding and perhaps start a student union in our school. I've been able to get 40 signatures so far to support this idea, but when I try to explain the idea to other students they call me a "hippie" or a "dirty commie" and yet they still complain about the conditions in the school and maybe it could be fear of expressing themselves. Today's youth just don't care and are closed minded. Another example of this, when you show you care about something or your views differ from theirs they'll put you down and continuously bother you about it, and I find it disgusting how racist they are. I'm not to say that the youth are to blame for this kind of behaviour but that it's most likely society, and a solution that I think may work better is if we open up their minds a bit more to what's around them and let them understand more about others. Ian Bryson
Sorrento, WA
The recent article TV Shows Worth Watching had a very worrying review of Soundtrack To War. The review makes a variety of fait accompli conclusions on the "mentality" of the US army based on the dozen or so interview "bites" from a half-dozen or so wackos that were dug up, mostly in the first 10 minutes of the program, before the interviews and discussions proper. We don't know if these soldiers were a typical cross-section or not. We aren't told how many soldiers in total were interviewed for the feature to give us an idea how prevailing any mindset shown was, and for the "horrifying" bites we don't see the full interviews. The show should have been taken for what it was, a heavily edited highlight reel of the more interesting or controversial interviewees dug up, whether were guitar-playing introspectives or borderline psychopaths. The feature itself doesn't purport the conclusions drawn by the reviewer. The final supposed insight about the "dichotomy" is lazy and fatuous; the "dichotomy" presented is good television, not an objective survey. Chris
How can we calm a young man who shakes uncontrollably? What was it? How can we sooth his mind so he can get some sleep. His head feels like it is exploding. There are terrors racing through his every thought. He cannot even speak coherently. All we hear is gibberish. Is this the same bright eyed teenager who sought safety from Australia? Three years later, he is not a teenager and we do not recognise him. In Australia the thousands of Aussie "mums" are trying to do that via emails and faxes to the people in our Nauru detention camp. I wonder if DIMIA [Immigration Department] were trying to "start a fire" in the detention camp on Nauru when they went there this week to coerce people into returning to their places of nightmare. Was it a veiled hint when they spoke of deportation with "binding hands"? Was this just to cause distress or is it a real threat? Elaine SmithBack to index page
West Haven, NSW