The Guardian November 10, 2004


Bush's phoney "political capital"

Bob Briton

It did not take long for the election-night platitudes to stop. 
On Wednesday last week George W Bush was sweet-talking frustrated 
Democrat voters: "To make this nation stronger and better I will 
need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I 
can to deserve your trust." The very next day, the posture in 
front of the TV cameras had changed completely. "You asked do I 
feel free? Let me put it to you this way: I earned capital in the 
campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it. It is 
my style."

Like his junior Australian partner John Howard, the re-elected US 
President is ignoring the fact of a narrow victory to claim 
overwhelming support for more attacks on the health, education 
and security of ordinary Americans while furthering advantaging 
the wealthy and pressing ahead with more military adventures. 
Bush got no such ringing endorsement.

Out of a vote of around 114 million, George W Bush managed to get 
just three million more than the Democrat candidate John Kerry. 
To put it another way: if just over one and a half million people 
had reconsidered their decision to rally around the post 9/11 
"war-time" leader, the vote would have gone the other way.

While the religious right was successfully mobilised once more in 
support of the Republicans at the polls, the other big news of 
the elections was the strong turnout of the country's youth. The 
usual mass media sources played down the significance of the 
youth vote, however the 51.6 per cent turnout of 18-29 year-olds 
was the highest since 18-year-olds were given the vote in 1972. 
Young people voted 54 per cent for Kerry and just 44 per cent for 
Bush. Thankfully, the future is in this group's hands.

The US People's Weekly World noted other positive aspects 
of the campaign. Unions turned out about 27 million people to 
vote. New means of reaching people through entertainment and over 
the internet came into their own:

"While the results were a setback, a magnificent, progressive, 
grassroots electoral movement has been born. With the labor 
movement as its backbone, it encompasses women, African 
Americans, young people, Latinos, environmentalists, Native 
Americans, civil rights groups, Asian and Arab Americans, 
seniors, religious people, Internet activists, artists and first-
time voters. They came together to wrest our country back from 
the grip of a small group of far-right extremists. This new 
grassroots movement did heroic work. It couldn't win yet against 
the fear, racism, sexism, homophobia, terrorism and corporate 
power the powerful far right group wields, which influenced 
significant numbers of people."

The fact remains that the results, however close, are indeed a 
serious setback. In the same way that Howard has wasted no time 
pressing ahead with anti-people policies, Bush will set about 
implementing his "Plan for A Safer World & More Hopeful America". 
Even some of the language used to sell the Bush second term 
agenda would sound familiar to Australians.

For example, Bush will push for:

* Tax reform — "to make the tax code simpler for taxpayers, 
encourage saving and investment and improve the economy's ability 
to create jobs and raise wages". Encouraging savings and 
investment actually means tax cuts for the rich and corporate 
sector. Creating jobs means lower wages. Bush's first term record 
show that he cares little for creating jobs, and less for raising 
wages.

* Health care — "President Bush will call for a community health 
center in every poor county in America." Nobody may answer but 
you can bet there will be plenty more poor counties by 2008 if 
Bush gets his way.

* Welfare reform — Bush wants to build on the success of 
previous "reform", "strengthening families and helping more 
welfare recipients achieve independence through work". He wants 
to create "Opportunity Zones, which will encourage public and 
private investment and provide priority consideration for Federal 
benefits to communities that are under economic hardship." The 
same old story — kick more people off social security and onto 
the resources of struggling families or into pitifully low-paying 
jobs. Faith-based charities will get a bigger share of the 
welfare action once Bush has ensured they can participate 
"without discrimination".

* Judges — "President Bush will continue to appoint to the 
Federal Courts well-qualified judges who share his commitment to 
strictly interpret the law". Bush is set to stack the Supreme 
Court with right-wingers, not only to enshrine his "hang 'em 
high" policies but also to get support for more unpopular 
legislation. High on the list are outlawing abortion, gay 
marriages and stem cell research and possibly the introduction of 
conscription.

* Intelligence Reform — Bush will appoint a new National 
Intelligence Director to coordinate the Administration's "anti-
terror" intelligence gathering. Howard actually got in before 
Bush with introducing this one.

* "Defending American Lives and Liberty" — "President Bush will 
continue to lead a worldwide coalition to fight terrorists abroad 
so we do not have to face them here at home." (GOP Agenda) There 
will be no let up in the US-led drive to secure resources and 
markets for favoured transnational corporations. Bush is not 
dissuaded by the mounting US death toll in Iraq or the appalling 
cost in Iraqi civilian lives. Nor is he concerned at the record 
budget deficit and social consequences his wanton policies have 
produced.

The American people have also got a long period of tense struggle 
ahead of them. There will be pressure on the Democrats to move 
further to the right to try to steal some of the religious right 
vote off the Republicans. Support for Kerry and the Democrats 
from progressive US voters comes about in large part because they 
are a "less bad" option for workers and other exploited people. 
The support offered even on this basis would evaporate if the 
Democrats neglected their interests further to chase the unlikely 
support of extremist religious voters. The ALP would do well to 
take note of the parallels with Australia's recent experience.

Back to index page