Editorial:
Insidious propaganda
Rupert Murdoch denies that management interferes in editorial decision-making, and generally speaking that is probably true. The uniformly pro-war, fear-mongering line that pours out of his media empire, from the daily newspapers through Fox News television, is not the result of day-to-day edicts handed down from his board of directors. Murdoch backs George W Bush, the theft of civil rights and the military aggression being carried out under the cover of the war on terrorism. Senior editors are given their instructions, the wheels are put in motion and the general line followed: all employees must follow suit. The propaganda can be overt, or sly and underhand. The Weekend Australian Magazine of November 13-14 is a prime example. On its cover, instead of a headline there is a long quote — "She looked pregnant, otherwise she was completely normal. She looked at me. She smiled and then she exploded." There is the photograph of a young woman in army fatigues holding a child on one arm and a gun on the other. That particular issue of the magazine lift- out was a carefully designed promotion of racism tied to the denigration of women. The juxtaposition of photos, the order of appearance of its articles, the choice of subjects; all were loaded to give maximum effect to the cover story. There was a reminiscing piece on the women protesters who were arrested at the US base at Pine Gap in 1983, written as though the threat of nuclear annihilation by a world superpower no longer exists, and as if US spy bases are essentially benign presences. Next to that there was a profile of singer Tina Harrod — with glossy colour photo in designer fashions — who we are told critics are "comparing to Nina Simone and Aretha Franklin". Further on there is a head and shoulders colour portrait across two pages of "Perth teenager Gemma Ward", who we are informed is "the supermodel of the moment" but who has "her wide eyes set on bigger things". There followed two pages with a photo history. The next feature was a story about shark attacks with the upper- case headline "BLOOD IN THE WATER", leading into the cover story. Headlined "MOTHER, MURDERER, MARTYR", it asked, "What led a young mother to choose a murderous fate as a suicide bomber?" The article runs across seven pages. It asserts, "Every Palestinian wants to be a suicide bomber, in public at least. Western reporters' notebooks are filled with page after page of declarations of an imminent self-sacrifice that rarely happens. Like an old coin the same tired slogans have passed from hand to hand despite the dawning recognition that the war of martyrs has failed." Further on the author contradicts himself, claiming "the cult of martyrdom has grown". And in order to rob the story of its political content, the article insinuates, without any facts to back it up, that the young mother had become pregnant in an adulterous affair and that that was why she carried out the bombing. It says she had "never left the prison strip of Gaza", which is "crammed with 1.3 million Palestinian refugees", that she "lived in a world of suffocating closeness." The author's description of Palestinian society, its historical and cultural make up, is placed in skewered context: "The tribe, not the individual is paramount. Western concepts of individualism — the ambitions and dreams, the private bedroom that Australian teenagers take for granted — are culturally alien." The Israeli occupation, the real "suffocating closeness", is mentioned, but the impression conveyed is that this is simply a necessary measure in order to keep in check an "alien" culture. The conclusion we are expected to draw from all of this is that the answer to the question posed at the beginning, "What led a young mother to?" must be, "Because she is not Western", meaning "civilised", meaning her "uncivilised" society drove her to it. The real barbarians — Israel's Sharon Government and its state- sponsored terror — are left completely out of the picture. If only she had been like that blues singer, that supermodel, those spirited women at Pine Gap, who after all didn't resort to that sort of thing. Such are the insidious peddlers of racial hatred and the promoters of war.Back to index page