Exposure: The Bhopal disaster
Peter Mac Just after midnight on December 3, 1984 there was a gas leakage at Union Carbide's pesticide plant at Bhopal in India. The accident, which is said to have been triggered in part by a refrigeration plant being turned off as an economy measure, released 40 tonnes of toxic methyl isocyanate gas into the atmosphere, forming a cloud that covered an area of 40 square kilometres around the plant. It was the world's worst industrial accident. Three thousand people died that night from the effects of the gas. There were 8000 casualties in the three days after the accident, and another 20,000 have died since. One hundred and twenty thousand people have survived, but with terrible injuries to the eyes, skin, lungs and other parts of the body. Since the disaster, the rates of cancer, infant mortality and deformities in and around Bhopal area have soared. More than 572,000 survivors have now been officially classified as victims of the accident, either because of their injuries or because of loss of earning power or other ill effects. Union Carbide declined to reveal the composition of the chemicals involved on the basis that this knowledge was their intellectual property. (This made it extremely difficult for medical authorities to treat the victims in the immediate aftermath of the blast.) Although only five years old, the plant had been losing money. After the accident the company simply abandoned it. The manager, Warren Anderson, was arrested but skipped bail and lives in great comfort in the US despite an Interpol warrant for his arrest. The company later made a small compensation payment to the victims, but it was not until 1989, after a court case mounted by the Indian Government, that a legal settlement was reached. The company had chosen to contest the case in India, rather than in the US, where the damages were likely to be much larger. The Indian Government demanded US$15 billion in damages, but in the event only $US470 million was forthcoming. Moreover, the victims did not receive anything until November this year, just under 20 years after the tragedy. The entitlement for each victim was some 25,000 rupees. At the current rate of exchange that is about A$757, or approximately $38 for each year the victims have had to wait. Not surprisingly, many of the victims felt that this did not represent a just outcome. The environmental organisation Greenpeace and a coalition of survivor groups is now campaigning for adequate compensation, as well as for the company (which has been taken over by Dow Chemicals) to carry out remediation to the site, whose soil and water are still shockingly polluted. An exhibition on the disaster is currently on display in Sydney. Shortly after the disaster, Indian photographer Raghu Rai visited the site to record its aftermath. Last year he again visited Bhopal to document the long-term impacts on the local residents. His haunting images, reminiscent of the post-Hiroshima photographs, form the basis of the exhibition. The exhibition will be on display in Sydney, with half the photographs at the Tap Gallery at 278 Palmer St, Darlinghurst and the other half at the George Hannah Memorial Library in King St, Mascot, until January 30, 2005.