Individual contracts
The choice is ... no choice
by Tom Pearson Around 65 workers producing air conditioners and heaters at a plant in the southern Sydney suburb of Kingsgrove have effectively been gagged and bound after being forced onto individual contracts (Australian Workplace Agreements — AWAs). The contracts contain far inferior wages, conditions and benefits than under the workers' former situation, and none dare speak out for fear of losing their job. Under the contracts their job status has gone from permanent to casual. The foisting of the AWAs onto the workers at the F Muller plant was achieved in a sly and underhanded tactic that sets a precedent for employers to squeeze out the union and force lower wages and conditions onto their workforce. At the same time it has demonstrated how employers can exclude any militant workers using deceit and invasion of privacy. F Muller was owned by Email, the company which recently announced that it is going to close its Sydney whitegoods site in the suburb of Meadowbank and throw that plant's 474 employees out of work. The F Muller operations were put up for sale in their entirety late last year. When no satisfactory offer was forthcoming Email split the operations in two, firstly selling one half to air conditioning manufacturers Kirbys. The other half, which produces car heaters and air conditioners, was bought by US corporation Tripac International. The sale included F Muller's production contracts with Ford and Holden. But they didn't tell the workers about the Tripac takeover, maintaining that the intention was to close down the automotive section altogether. They announced the closure just weeks before Christmas last year and paid the workers their redundancy entitlements. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) had got wind that Email had sold the plant but the company continued to deny it. Then, one week before Christmas most of the former F Muller employees received a letter from body hire company E L Blue inviting them to "join a new and exciting workforce" at the very same F Muller site. The union took Email to the Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) but the company kept on ducking the question of the sale, claiming that they had only hired E L Blue to find the redundant workers new jobs. In fact Email had commissioned the body hire firm to negotiate AWAs with the workers, and signing the contracts was a condition of being employed. A further "incentive" to sign was that rejection of the contract meant that they would not receive unemployment benefits because they had actually been offered a job. The choice was no choice at all. The IRC rejected the union's claim that the workers should be employed under their former conditions. The contracts are a boon for new owner Tripac, with workers now having no maternity leave, sick leave, holiday pay or overtime pay. They now earn $80 less a week. The picking and choosing of those to be re-employed was made easier by the handing over the personal files of all the employees to E L Blue. The union took this incident to the NSW Privacy Commissioner, claiming a breach of the workers' privacy. Email denied handing the files over, and claimed not to know how they came to be in the hands of E L Blue. No action was taken by the Privacy Commissioner. The union is currently arguing a case in the State's Department of Fair Trading that the whole process breaches fair trading laws. Tripac is now supplementing its workforce with casual, non-union labour, such as backpacker tourists. "People are frightened to talk to us when we go there", AMWU organiser, Harry Delaney, told The Guardian. "With the new employer they've got hardly any entitlements, and they're not building up any entitlements. "What we're saying to the workers is that it's not going to get any better until they agree to meet with us somewhere and get united. But that's not easy." The union has access to the site during the lunch break. "One thing that concerns us is that this is a new model where you close down, pay the workers out, re-hire them all on individual contracts, slash their conditions and take their on-the-job democracy away from them", said Mr Delaney. "If anyone dared put their hand up to be a shop steward there at the moment, they suddenly wouldn't be needed. They'd be sent off somewhere else. They'd say, `we haven't sacked him, we've offered him a job in the Blue Mountains'. That's the difficulty; it's a new model that others can run off."