USA:
Congress examines "corporate welfare"
Republican presidential hopeful John Kasich of Ohio won't have done his chances of winning big-business support for his candidature much good with his latest move as Chairman of the House Budget Committee. Kasich's Committee held the first ever congressional hearings into what US critics call "corporate welfare", the hundreds of billions of dollars annually given to big corporations from the public purse in the form of subsidies, bailouts, giveaways and tax exemptions. So blatant are these vast transfers into the pockets of the richest corporations that even conservative organisations and politicians (like Kasich himself) are revolted. The looting of government (i.e. public) funds has itself become big business. One of the witnesses who appeared before the Committee, consumer activist Ralph Nader described his own testimony in an article in the San Jose Mercury News (the paper that exposed the CIA's role in introducing crack cocaine into South Central Los Angeles' black community). "My testimony described several categories of corporate welfare. These included the giveaways of hard rock minerals like gold and molybdenum to domestic and foreign mining companies, the giveaway of the public airwaves, which belong to the people, to radio and television stations (including the latest $70 billion gift of the digital spectrum), taxpayer subsidies for giant defence corporate mergers and commercial weapons exports to governments overseas, and making patients pay twice for important drugs — once as taxpayers to develop the medicine and again as patients after the federal government gives a monopoly marketing power to the price-gouging drug company." Nader cited a woman with ovarian cancer charged $14,000 for six treatments of Taxol sold by Bristol-Meyers-Squibb. He pointed out that "more than $30 million of taxpayers' money developed this drug right through the human clinical trials. "Bristol-Meyers got it and no other company did. So there is no price competition to drive the Taxol price down. If patients with cancer have to go on Medicaid because they cannot afford this gouge, then the taxpayers again pay Bristol-Meyers for Taxol. "By the way", he added, "Bristol-Meyers is not obligated to pay the government any royalties on what this year will be $1 billion in sales. Do you know any business that develops and gives away its assets like that?", he asked. Most of the major media organisations ignored the Budget Committee hearings, but cable news channel C-Span covered it live and "relayed a remarkable array of witnesses and testimony to the American people who are paying these bills".