Britain:
Family tax credits undermine wages
Britain's Labour Government has taken a leaf out of the policy book of Australia's Labor Governments with a policy which the government says will lift out of poverty the one third of all children in Britain who are now born into poverty. It will, the Government claims, halt the polarisation of wealth in Britain. Launched by Chancellor Gordon Brown and PM Tony Blair, it is the Working Families Tax Credit (WFTC). Like Bob Hawke's famous declaration that no Australian child would live in poverty by 1990, British Labour's scheme not only fails to alleviate poverty it is more likely to accentuate it. It calls for an allowance, paid by the Inland Revenue (taxation department) directly into workers' wage packets. It guarantees every working family an income of at least L10,000 a year, or L200 a week. It will also provide a subsidy of L70 a week towards childcare expenses for working mothers. By putting the money into wage packets the state is effectively subsidising bosses' wages bills. Employers can now pay as little as they like, for no matter how criminally low the wages they pay the state will top them up out of income tax revenues and the Value Added Tax which all workers pay on nearly everything they buy. The subsidy is only paid to families with at least one adult working member. The WFTC will do nothing at all for children from families that do not have a full-time worker and are even more destitute. Even with a L70 per week credit, there is no childcare available for someone whose only job prospect is working in a burger bar until 1am or so. Pressure is being stepped up on those out of work to now accept any job whatsoever. "Work now pays; now go to work", says the Chancellor waving a big stick. "For the first time ever, work will always pay more than benefits." Penalties will be stepped up. Under the new scheme those who refuse a particular job can lose six months' benefit. The coercion to be applied means that workers are being forced to take any job on offer — to take short-term jobs where they are obliged to sign a piece of paper waiving their statutory rights to sick pay, holidays or protection under the new maximum hours regulations which they might otherwise refuse. Britain's bosses can now be as awful as they like and still be assured of a constant supply of job applicants. And just in case workers think they can struggle and get the wages paid by the boss increased, the supplement will be cut if a worker's wage increases. So no matter how hard and how successfully low paid workers struggle to lift their wages, their total wage packet will remain the same. This will be a real disincentive to struggle for higher wages and will undermine support for trade unions — as it is no doubt intended. Rather than being a cure for poverty, it will become a poverty trap for many.
Back to index page