The Guardian

The Guardian October 13, 1999


Culture and Life

by Rob Gowland

Market forces

According to the spokespersons for capitalism, if you just 
leave it to the market things will sort themselves out to 
perfection. Well, in California, film production is down by 13 
percent so far this year. It seems the industry is moving its 
filmmaking offshore to where it's cheaper.

Never mind, the market will take care of all those film industry 
workers suddenly bereft of mainstream film production. Porno 
movie production is up 25 percent.

Yep. According to the Los Angeles County Economic Development 
Corporation (EDC) one out of five film shoots in July was a porno 
movie. Isn't it good to know that art and culture and creativity 
can still flourish under capitalism?

Official estimates place between 10,000 and 20,000 people in 
Southern California alone as being employed in the pornography 
industry. It's a big business.

Around 10,000 new pornographic videos will be released in the US 
this year — a significant increase on the 8,950 released last 
year. Jack Kyser, chief economist of the EDC told the Los 
Angeles Times that "given the distress in the entertainment 
industry, the success of the adult segment is a welcome anchor in 
the wind".

By that logic, we should encourage "snuff movies" (filming actual 
killings) and the televising of executions because they would 
help keep the industry afloat.

And to think some of us have denied the worth of market forces. 
How could we have been so blind, I wonder?

* * *
More market forces Still on market forces for the moment: while the US stock market reaches ever newer highs as share dealers speculate in stocks whose prices no longer have any relationship to their earnings capacity, have you ever considered where the money comes from? Some of it, of course, comes straight out of the pockets of working class people. And not just working class people. According to data from the US Congressional Budget Office, four out of five US households, or about 217 million people, are taking home a thinner slice of the economic pie today than in 1977. But another source of money to fuel Wall Street's merger mania and stock speculation is the drug trade. The CIA is today estimated to control drug trafficking worth a whopping US$200 billion a year. Laundering that money provides a welcome source of low cost corporate loans that big business is only too pleased to utilise. It also provides a source of funds for political campaigns which cost tens of millions in the US now, and for financing covert operations and "guerrilla" wars in foreign countries as well as covert police and intelligence operations in the US itself. This is funding over which the US Congress has no control at all. But successive US administrations have used the drug trade to fund covert activities from domestic spying to actual wars in Asia and Latin America, notably in IndoChina, then in Afghanistan, then in Nicaragua and El Salvador, more recently in Venezuela, Chechnya, Kosovo. But to have a drug trade, you have to have someone to sell the drugs to. The CIA, and their underworld associates, chose to target the black community in the US (beginning with South Central Los Angeles). They thus demonstrated their innate racism, but also their class allegiance. Because of historic racism in the US, the black community figures disproportionately among the poor and the lower-paid workers. Black workers are among the most militant, the most radical of US citizens. By targeting the black community, the CIA drug marketing campaign fostered the growth and influence of a criminal element, provided a "valid" excuse to impose a severe terrorist police rule over the black neighbourhoods and to imprison the black community. The number of black Americans in prison is no accident. The furor that erupted over the initial press disclosures of CIA past involvement in fostering the crack cocaine epidemic (specifically to fund the Nicaraguan Contras) was abruptly shut down with a campaign of vilification of papers and journalists who tried to pursue it. However, the most recent report of the CIA Inspector General tended to support the allegations and Congress was moved to investigate. The right promptly asserted pressure to "hose down" (if not shut down) this investigation too. Public pressure and courageous campaigns by activists for civil rights and a handful of honest cops have forced the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), the body doing the investigating, to continue their hearings and not shut them down. A key witness the HPSCI is now to hear from is former Los Angeles Police Department narcotics investigative officer Michael Ruppert. He has supplied the Committee with thousands of pages of information on the subject of the CIA and drugs. Ruppert says he can prove CIA complicity in the illegal drug trade is still ongoing, on an enormous scale.
* * *
Jesus, it's the millennium! I suppose it was inevitable, but the imminent arrival of the year 2000 also means the imminent flooding of our TV screens with made-for-TV movies about Jesus. This would not matter so much if the movies came from anywhere except the US commercial TV networks, not exactly notable for their understanding of either the teachings of Jesus or the historical significance (still less the actual history) of Christianity. The three big networks all have a prime-time Jesus movie on the way. American ABC will screen The Miracle Maker, the life of Christ done in animation using clay figures. NBC is going for human interest with Mary and Jesus while CBS has gone for the big one: a four-hour mini-series (also on the life of Christ, but apparently with actors). All of them will then turn up on our screens here.

Back to index page