"Scannergate" rocks the Liberals
by Peter Mac The Federal Liberal Party establishment has been rocked by investigations concerning the highly profitable orders for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines by a number of private radiology practices. The investigation by the Health Insurance Commission followed an extraordinary rush of orders for 52 of these $3 million machines in the weeks immediately before the release of the Federal Budget. The Budget papers included a new provision for special tax rebates for patients tested with the machines. The new provisions encourage overservicing. Those who had MRI machines (especially the latest technology) would be ideally placed to meet the increased demand for service. The machines have the potential to generate $1.5 million in revenue per year. The catch was that the rebate would only apply to machines currently in use, and those ordered before Budget night. The 54 radiologists who placed orders for machines in this period appear to have acted in unseemly haste. Contrary to statutory declarations signed earlier by some of the radiologists, the recent investigations have revealed that their orders for the new machines included "escape" clauses which would have allowed them to cancel the deal in the event that things were not as profitable as expected. For example, if it was true that certain firms had prior access to information concerning the new rebate provisions, the escape clauses would have protected them in the event of the provisions being cancelled by the Government at the last minute. And some of the contracts for supply of the machines were backdated to before budget night! In the centre of the controversy is Federal Health Minister Dr Michael Wooldridge. He has emphatically denied that he leaked the information about the budget provisions to the radiologists or that he had anything to do with any such activity. With great dignity, and with a distinct break in the voice, he described any such accusation as "cowardly". The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists has also distanced itself from the controversy. The College's President, Professor John Earwaker focused on the standing of the profession, noting that: "there is the potential for considerable harm to be caused to the standing of our speciality and to the well-deserved high reputation of our members." Although acknowledging the eager anticipation of his fellow radiologists, and despite the potential for huge income generation of the new MRI machines, Professor Earwaker stressed the cooperation of the College members as a whole with the Federal Government's health objectives. The investigations into the "scan scam" are continuing. And despite the denials of involvement in the affair by the Minister personally and the College of Radiologists collectively, it would appear that something is definitely amiss. Of the 54 firms concerned, 29 have so far been investigated, and 16 of these are now to be referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions. The "scan scam" is a classic example of private medical entrepreneurs in operation which only leads to overservicing and higher costs. The MRI machines should be in public hospitals under the control of the public health system, where their prime function is medical, not profit- generation.
Back to index page