The Guardian November 24, 1999


Parents & teachers unite for education

by Peter Mac

A 24-hour strike was held last Thursday by teachers employed in NSW public 
schools, TAFE Colleges, the Adult Migrant Education Service, the Department 
of Corrective Services and the Department of Education and Training. There 
was overwhelming support among teachers for the industrial action, which 
took place in defiance of a directive of the Industrial Relations 
Commission (IRC) to call off the action.

Stopwork meetings were attended by more than 25,000 teachers, with only 135 
voting against strike action. A further series of two-hour strikes are 
scheduled to take place over the next two weeks.

The strike action has been supported by the NSW Association of Parents and 
Citizens Association (P&C), the Independent Teachers' Union, the NSW 
Legislative Council and other organisations and individuals.

Responding to the strike (and attempting to absolve himself from blame), 
the NSW Director-General of Education Ken Boston clearly implied that 
teachers were responsible for the poor conditions in NSW schools. He said 
that teachers should understand why the numbers in public education had 
fallen from 78 per cent to 70 per cent over the last 20 years.

Ignoring issues like overcrowding, poor maintenance, excessively large 
student/teacher ratios, poor pay for teachers and diversion of funds to 
private schools, he described the Teachers' Federation as deeply 
conservative, with no understanding of "customer orientation".

The strike followed some 15 months of stonewalling by the Government on 
teacher pay claims.

After brief discussions, the Government referred the issue to the IRC, 
lodging its own "claim" against the teachers, in which it offered a minimum 
pay rise of four per cent over four years for the majority of grades, in 
return for harder work, longer hours, reduced vacation times and reductions 
in many other conditions of service.

The NSW Teachers' Federation described the salary and conditions "package" 
offered by the Government to teachers as worse than anything proposed by 
the infamous former Liberal Education Minister Terry Metherell.

Federation President Ms Sue Simpson accused the Premier of trying to avoid 
a community debate about the massive changes to education in NSW and the 
best means of addressing a teacher shortage.

She said: "The Government must come out of hiding, and accept 
responsibility for ensuring harmony in our public schools and colleges. ... 
They are pursuing a punitive line on a profession that goes out of its way 
to be caring. It's the psychology of the bully."

Teachers in Catholic schools, who will also be affected by the Government's 
salaries offer, will also be taking strike action in Sydney, Wollongong, 
Newcastle and regional centres this Wednesday.

Mr Dick Shearman, Secretary of the Independent Teachers' Union, agreed that 
the salary offer was worse than anything put forward by Dr Metherell or 
former Victorian Premier Jeff Kennett.

The head of Catholic schools in the Archdiocese of Sydney, Brother Kevin 
Canavan, stated that overworked and under-appreciated teachers were being 
forced to strike.

"If the community wants a highly competent and motivated teaching force, we 
need to act to ensure that teachers salaries and conditions are 
commensurate with the high levels of responsibility and accountability 
expected of them", he said.

Ms Bev Baker, President of the Federation of Parents and Citizens 
Associations of NSW, praised the innovative role of NSW public school 
teachers in developing new methods of education and improved links with 
parents and the community.

She clearly sheeted home the blame for the strike to the NSW Premier, 
noting that:

"Bob Carr must have known that an award that seeks to completely 
restructure the working lives of teachers while forcing them to accept a 
cut in real wages could only result in open warfare on the industrial 
front....

"Parents hate strikes, but they're not naive about what causes them. They 
can see that the Premier's deliberately aggressive industrial policies ... 
have created havoc and hardship throughout the State."

The Labor Government's lodgement of a claim against its employees has set a 
dangerous precedent for use of the industrial court system by employers to 
attack the wages and conditions of their employees. It is an astonishing 
act by a government which claims to represent working people.

Privatisation

Ken Boston's use of the term "customer orientation" is also highly 
significant. The NSW teachers dispute provides clear evidence of the 
gradual transfer of the public education system to the private sector.

This has already started with the reduction of the Technical and Further 
Education (TAFE) system, including the closure of some TAFE facilities, and 
the sale of public education assets to private schools. 

The transfer is now being assisted by the run-down of public school 
facilities, and the degradation of teachers' salaries.

Although salaries at commencement of service are comparatively good, 
teachers soon fall behind in comparison with other professionals.

Salaries at Catholic schools are the same as those of the State teachers, 
but salaries of teachers at other private schools are far superior to those 
of public school teachers. The NSW Minister for Education John Aqualina 
sends his own children to one such wealthy private school!

However, if the NSW Government thinks it can continue to put the boot into 
the state public education system, it should think again.

As Ms Baker noted: "The Premier's single-minded pursuit of industrial 
brinkmanship has angered parents, infuriated teachers, and left the 
Director-General of Education and Training defending the indefensible."

Regarding the current dispute she stated: " The ball is firmly in the 
Government's court. This award must be withdrawn immediately. Teachers must 
be offered a sensible salary increase on the basis of their current working 
conditions and reflecting their increased skills and responsibilities. ... 
People will not tolerate having their children used as missiles in the 
Premier's industrial warfare."

Back to index page