Okinawa: the people say close US bases
In search of a safe place free of protests and the glare of the world media, the Group of Eight major capitalist countries will hold a summit in July this year in Okinawa, Japan. Known as the Military Base Island, Okinawa is effectively occupied by the US military through the Japan-US Security Treaty. It is no coincidence that representatives of the world's most powerful capitalist governments chose to shelter there during their deliberations. The following is an examination by the Japanese Communist Party of the history and current situation in Okinawa. Until the outbreak of the Second World War, Okinawa was a peaceful island without even Japanese military forces stationed there. The only thing relating to the military was a conscription office with a commander and a few staff members. Without military bases the people of Okinawa lived in peace and had friendly relations with their Asian neighbours. It was only in 1944 when Japan's defeat became imminent and the Japanese Government decided to make Okinawa the place for final "decisive battles" that military forces were stationed there on a full scale. With the defeat of Japan the stationing of military forces in Okinawa should have been put to an end. However, present-day Okinawa is so overcrowded with US military bases and facilities that it is said: "The bases are not in Okinawa. Okinawa is among military bases." Stepping onto Okinawa you will realise that this description is not an exaggeration. Eleven percent of the land area of Okinawa Prefecture is occupied by US bases. This figure goes up to 20 percent in the Okinawa mainland. In the island prefecture of 1.3 million people, 27,000 US troops are stationed. Nowhere in Europe can you find a country with such a province or state. Moreover, these US bases in Okinawa are situated right in the midst of very populated areas. For example, Kadena Air Base takes up 83 percent of the land area of Kadena Town, forcing more than 10,000 residents to live on the remaining 17 percent of land. The town residents' houses, schools, hospitals and other facilities are squeezed in the small areas within only several hundred metres of the base's aircraft runways. Such a situation is not limited to Kadena. There are another two towns, Kin Town and Chatan Town, and the Ginoza Village, which have over 50 percent of their land taken up by US bases. And there are five more municipalities where more than 30 percent of their land is taken (Yomitan Village, Higashi Village, Okinawa City, Ie Village and Ginowan City). How has Okinawa been brought to such a situation? What kind of problems do the people of Okinawa have as a result? History of US bases With the stationing of the Japanese Army in 1944 Okinawa became the only place in Japan during WW2 where a ground battle was fought involving non- combatants. The battle, which lasted 80 days, from the end of March 1945, was named "Iron Storm" because of the amount of naval gun fire during the period. The intensity and severity of the battle was fierce. More than 10,000 US soldiers and about 90,000 Japanese troops were killed in the battle. Even more notable was the number of noncombatants slaughtered. More than 100,000 people — nearly one third of the prefecture — were killed. The US military forces, in occupying Okinawa, sent surviving citizens to concentration camps they set up in different parts of the prefecture. These continued on after the end of the war. During the period from the end of 1945 to 1947, the citizens were released from the camps. Coming back home they were astonished to find vast areas of US military bases stretching before their eyes. Their homes and farms were bulldozed flat and they were not allowed to step onto their own land, which was surrounded by barbed wire. In Chatan Town there had been a Japanese airfield. Requisition of the airfield was not enough for the US military. They took 40 times the land around the old airfield to build the present Kadena base. The townspeople of Chatan were allowed to live only on the worst land. The total farming land area shrunk to less than one percent compared with pre- war days. Even the remaining farms were devastated by the war. Chatan was not the only example. During the same period in many different parts of Okinawa, a total of 18,000 hectares, or eight percent of the total land area of the prefecture, was requisitioned by the US in a similar manner. Around 40,000 land owners lost their land and 12,000 households were forced to leave their residences. No compensation of any kind was ever paid them. International law (The Hague Convention) prohibits the confiscation of private property, even during war. Even if the requisition is conducted out of military necessity, payment for the loss is obligatory. What was done to the people of Okinawa by the US was a clear violation of international law for which no justification can be made. Peace treaty After the war the Okinawan people started to work on what little farm land was saved from the US requisition, and going through great pains they managed to restore their land and make it arable again. They believed that they could retrieve their old land after the signing of the peace treaty. However, the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty, signed between the allies and Japan, allowed the US to continue its occupation and rule of Okinawa. It was followed by further requisition of people's land on a larger scale which was to impose more burdens and suffering on the people. On Iejima Island a new round of land confiscations started in 1953. The US Forces pressed the people of the island to hand over their land, encouraging them to immigrate to South America or threatening them by sending their officers to the people's homes. Since the end of the war Iejima farmers had worked arduously on their devastated farm land, now devoid of trees, and restored about half of their pre-war production. For the farmers further requisition of their land was too much to take. They were resolved to oppose the plan. In 1955, seeing that persuading the farmers would be impossible, the US military decided to resort to strong- arm measures. On the same beach where they launched the landing operation exactly 10 years before, the US military unloaded 300 armed troops and vehicles and surrounded the village. Unarmed the villagers sat on their land, believing that "US soldiers will understand our sentiment if they are humans". But the US military turned deaf ears to the people's plea. They bulldozed 13 houses, burned them and confiscated their land. In this way some 63 percent of the land area of Iejima Island was requisitioned by the US military. In 1972, 27 years after the end of WW2, the administrative rights over Okinawa were returned to Japan. However, the people did not doubt at all that they could enter their own lands over the fences of the bases and get them back. The Okinawan people's desire was again betrayed. What underlies this situation is the Japanese Government's assurance to the US that the function of the bases would not decline. In order to fulfill its promise the Japanese Government enacted a special law to allow the US to continue using the lands that had been taken by the US military by force. Purpose of the bases Why has the US clung to constructing and maintaining the military bases in Okinawa? Are they necessary for the defence of Japan? Absolutely not. In 1982 the then US Secretary of State, Casper Weinberger, stated: "The marines on Okinawa are not assigned to the defence of Japan." The US recognises Okinawa as a vital foothold for their operations in the Asia-Pacific region. The US deployment is one of three US Marine Divisions. Okinawa is the only place outside the US that hosts the Marine Corps on a division scale. A total of 17,000 marines are stationed there. During the 1990s the US organised Marine Expeditionary Units, special new forces with increased mobility, including the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit in Okinawa. The fundamental duty of these troops is to carry out operations widely in the Asia-Pacific region. In 1996, Admiral Joseph W Preuher, at that time the Commander of the US Pacific Command, told the US Senate that the Marine Corps and other US forces "are ideally positioned to respond to contingencies in the western Pacific". The US 7th Fleet goes into action with the Marine Corps stationed on Okinawa. Accidents and crimes The fear of possible accidents around the bases haunts the residents. In April last year a helicopter from the Futenma base crashed on the coast in an area where an electricity plant was located. Last June a Harrier attack plane failed to take off and went up in flames. In Okinawa such accidents are almost daily occurrences. Okinawa residents have begun legal action against the Japanese Government to stop night flights from the Kadena base and for compensation for the trauma the US military flights have caused them. Over the years there have been many accidents fatal to the civilian population and many crimes committed by US soldiers. In September 1995 a school girl was abducted and raped by three US soldiers. The Okinawa police demanded that the suspects be handed over to Japan, but the US refused. The incident roused the anger of the people. Rallies were held across Okinawa involving 92,000 people. They demanded the eradication of crimes by US soldiers, the revision of the Status of Forces Agreement (which allows US personnel to avoid prosecution in Japan), and the realignment and reduction of the bases. From the rape and murder of a woman in 1972 to the present there have been many thousands of criminal offences by US soldiers in Okinawa. Pollution The US forces are given exclusive rights to administer their military bases: Japan's domestic laws cannot be applied to them, nor are they answerable to US laws. In such a situation there is no means to protect Okinawa's natural environment from being destroyed. In Camp Hansen, for example, US forces carry out live-fire exercises regularly, often causing fires at the impact areas, destroying forest and vegetation, laying the mountains bare. On several occasions red clay has flowed out of the mountains into Kin Bay, causing the accumulation of mud which pollutes the coral reef. Pollution from toxic PCBs is also serious. Trunks containing PCBs have been found piled up out in the open in Kadena Air Base. In 1995 after the Onna Communications complex was returned to Japan PCBs were detected on the site. Although PCB-polluted soil was removed in containers, no one knows when this sludge, weighing 20 tonnes, will be disposed of. When part of the Kadena Ammunition Storage area was returned in June last year, the landowner was not informed until the day it was handed over that toxic substances such as hexavalent chromium and lead in excess of environmental standards had been detected. The US Forces Northern Training area is a treasury of rare plants and animals, such as the pryer's woodpecker. But neither the government or the relevant municipalities have the right to inspect the area. Protection for criminals The US has primary jurisdiction under the Status of Forces Agreement. More than 45,000 crimes and accidents involving US soldiers on duty have occurred, causing 512 deaths. But none of them have been tried by court marshal. Even when local police try to hold US soldiers responsible for violations of traffic regulations, the US forces use the Agreement and deliver a certification that the culprits were "on duty". In the cases where crimes are committed by off-duty soldiers, it is common in all countries that the primary jurisdiction belongs to the host country, with a mechanism allowing for the host country to abandon its jurisdiction in special cases. Japan uses this mechanism more than any other host country. What the people want The 1995 rape of the Okinawa schoolgirl by US military personnel prompted a sharp increase in the number of Okinawan people calling for the reduction and removal of US bases in Okinawa and for a review of of the privileged position the US forces enjoy in Japan. The huge Okinawa Prefecture Rally in October of that year adopted a resolution which demanded the immediate revision of the Status of Forces Agreement and the reduction of US bases. In a referendum on these questions soon after, in which almost 60 percent of Okinawan people voted, 91.26 percent were in favour. The Okinawa Prefectural Government then drew up an Action Program which called for the closure of the US bases in three stages to achieve an Okinawa that would be free of military bases by the year 2015. The program included economic and social development by using the land returned to the people, with the first stage being the closure of Futenma Air Station, located in the midst of a densely populated area. Exploiting this call the US and Japanese Governments are planning to construct a more powerful military base in Nago City as a condition for the closure Futenma Air Station. This would be a state-of-the-art base where the new Osprey military aircraft can be deployed as a replacement for helicopters. A US Department of Defence report stresses that the Osprey "is necessary to conduct ... forcible-entry operations" and "allows Marines to strike rapidly at objects located deep inland". They want to deploy the Osprey because, compared to the present helicopters, its cruising speed is twice as fast, its payloads three times as much and its flying range is five to ten times further. The Osprey would allow US forces to deploy troops directly from Okinawa to the Taiwan Straits and to the Korean Peninsula. It can also conduct horizontal flights like fixed-wing aircraft, as well as vertical landing and take off. This plan is part of the US attempt to keep its bases in Okinawa permanently. The US Department of Defence final draft document for the Futenma Relocation states: "The SBF (sea-based facilities of the new base) and all associated structures shall be designed for a 40-year operational life with a 200-year fatigue life." In other words, the US plans to construct a military base that can be used well into the 21st century. The people of Nago city have already expressed opposition to the construction of the base in a referendum. Despite this opposition the Japanese and US Governments are trying by all means to have the construction go ahead. The Group of Eight summit meeting will be held in July when the relocation plan is at its crucial stage. The Japanese Communist Party is campaigning for the scrapping of the Japan- US Security Treaty and the building of a peaceful Japan without US bases. "But we believe the suffering of the Okinawan people must be immediately ended even before the Security Treaty is ended. We hope that the world's people will come to know Okinawa's situation, and its desire to be free of its predicament."