Editorial:
Israel's murderous aggressive war
The murderous Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people is now plain for all to see. It was always an unequal struggle — stones against high-powered weapons and now, helicopter gunships firing on unarmed civilians. One can imagine the screaming headlines should such events occur in China, Russia or many other countries on the hit-list of the mass media. The Palestinian demonstrators are doing no more than protesting the years of oppression at the hands of the Israeli police and military and are demanding their legitimate right to form an independent Palestinian state on lands which have been owned and occupied by Palestinians for thousands of years. It is now and has always been the Zionist leaders of Israel who have been the aggressors with the real aim of establishing a "greater" Israel in the region. In 1967, it was Israel that committed aggression against Syria, Egypt and Lebanon and on that occasion administered a severe defeat on these countries. The UN resolution 242 adopted at the time, called for the withdrawal of all Israeli occupation forces. But with the backing of the United States, Israel did not and has not implemented this UN resolution. The struggle against Israeli occupation grew again after some years and took the form of the Intifada in the West Bank and Gaza, and guerrilla warfare in southern Lebanon. The Intifada became a very severe embarrassment to the Israeli authorities as the demand for a real settlement with the Palestinians began to grow internationally and inside Israel as well. There grew up a genuine Israeli peace movement. To save Israel from its embarrassment the US, as always, came to the rescue and initiated what was falsely called a "peace process" in 1993. The real aim was to bring an end to the Intifada which it did, and to provide time to build up Jewish settlements on Palestinian lands and build strategic roads linking these settlements which could rapidly transport Israeli military forces. The Declaration that was signed in 1993 between the Israeli Government and the Palestine Liberation Organisation did not recognise, even as an objective, the formation of a Palestinian state. The Palestine Interim Self-Governing Authority which was set up was to have only autonomy within the Israeli state. Some secret papers that The Guardian published at the time (22/9/1993), revealed in detail what the real aims of the Israeli and US negotiators were. As far as Jerusalem was concerned, this city was to be retained by Israel, come what may. Throughout the years of the "peace process", the Israeli and US negotiators attempted to force the Palestinians to accept an arrangement which would make them subservient to Israeli military, economic and political power into the foreseeable future. Perhaps to the surprise of the Israeli Government and to the US which is adept at arm-twisting, Yasser Arafat and other Palestinian leaders finally refused to play the role of betrayers of the Palestinian cause. The outrageous tactics of the US were dramatically demonstrated when Yasser Arafat walked out of a negotiating session recently and found the gates of the US Embassy in Paris, where the negotiations were taking place, closed against him. He was not only expected to capitulate to the Israeli/US demands but was to do so as a prisoner, behind the bars of the US Embassy gates. In the face of the new Palestinian uprising the real face of the Israeli authorities is to be seen again in the new war against the Palestinian people and their threat to re-occupy the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. It signals that the Israelis will use all their military force to prevent the formation of an independent Palestinian state. The role of the US is also clear. Clinton's objective in the so-called peace process was to buy time to further build up Israel as the gendarme of the US in the Middle East to be used against the Arab countries as required. While hypocritically demanding that others implement UN decisions, the US has systematically frustrated the implementation of the UN decisions calling for the withdrawal of Israel from the occupied territories. Furthermore, the Western powers have no intention of backing the "people's power" of the Palestinians.Back to index page