The Guardian

The Guardian February 14, 2001


Culture and Life

by Rob Gowland

Roll out the barrel

I was going to write about the crisis at Sydney's New Theatre this week, 
but I will do that next week instead. New Theatre's situation is unlikely 
to change in the interim and needs a little thought and investigation 
before I commit to print.

So instead I will comment on a little thing that came to my attention in 
the past week. FOCUS NORTH: Issue No 15, is a remarkable piece of 
self-promotion by the Federal MP Joe Hockey, headed Looking Back on the 
Year 2000.

Hockey is a Liberal Party "dry" and, as his flyer says, "represents over 
125,000 people in 32 suburbs on Sydney's lower North Shore". Actually 
Hockey holds the seat almost by default: the Labor Party has more or less 
abandoned it and no charismatic independent has arisen (as Ted Mack did) to 
wrest it back from the Libs. When one does, Hockey will be history.

The way the Libs intend to hold on to the seat, however, is clearly 
indicated in Hockey's newsletter. It is a glowing testimony to the 
principle of pork-barrelling. Every issue is dealt with solely in terms of 
how much Federal money was thrown its way.

Education? The P&C of a local primary school got $15,000 for an adventure 
playground, and a private catholic college, St Pius X College, got $2000 in 
public money (to publish a book of military service histories of former 
college students) (something we've all been crying out for, I'm sure). 
Naturally, Joe makes no mention of the decline in funding for public 
education at all levels.

Health care? A group providing support to drug users and their families 
received $50,000, Lane Cove Home and Community Care received $33,000 to 
fund nursing services for frail residents in their own homes and another 
homecare service, Hope Healthcare at Greenwich Hospital, received $168,000 
to provide respite for carers.

Roughly a quarter of a million dollars, all up. Spread over the 125,000 
people in Hockey's electorate that comes to a princely $2 a head. Even 
Hockey must have thought this would be seen as inadequate, for he rather 
desperately adds in the Federal budget, claiming that the main hospital in 
the electorate, Royal North Shore, (gained) from the paltry $650 million 
provided to public hospitals (nationwide) in the 2000-2001 budget.

No wonder that 67 percent of Lower North Shore residents have had to take 
out private health insurance (a statistic Hockey actually (boasts) about: 
Lower North Shore residents are (tops in the run for cover)!).

What about social services? Well, the Chatswood Salvation Army and the 
North Sydney St Vincent De Paul Society received $39,000 and $26,000 
respectively from the Federal Government's Emergency Relief program, so we 
don't have to worry about poverty, do we? In addition, the Guthrie 
Childcare Centre in the North Shore suburb of Wollstonecraft received 
$100,380 in capital funding while the Child Abuse Prevention Service got 
$30,000 (Hockey takes personal credit for this last one).

Or the environment? A bushcare group in Hunter's Hill got almost $20,000 to 
repair tracks and monitor habitats, while the Flat Rock Gully Landcare 
Group received $70,000 for grassroots conservation.

Hockey's implied message seems to be: "Vote for us: we'll take money away 
from the poor, the unemployed, the handicapped, from state schools, public 
hospitals, the Medicare system and the ABC, but we'll give some of it to 
YOU!" The concept obviously appeals to Hockey's supporters, but like him I 
think it needs camouflaging before it's used in elections.

Most groups are naturally grateful for whatever funding they receive by way 
of Federal grants, no matter how grudgingly given or how much effort has to 
be expended trying to get them.

But the whole lot of the grants listed still don't amount to serious money. 
For that you have to look at Hockey's (other) Federal grants.

Proudly he informs his electorate that a Chatswood company, Compass 
Resources, has scored a cool $4.7 (million) in a Commonwealth Research and 
Development grant — (for a mining extract project in the Northern 
Territory). That should create lots of jobs in the Lower North Shore of 
Sydney, eh?

The Americans have a name for grants of this type: (corporate welfare), 
public money given to companies to help them make profits or just to keep 
them in business. It's the natural outcome of a political view that sees 
government as merely an extension of business.

Later in the year Hockey was able to crow about two local information 
technology companies who benefited to the tune of "over $6 million each" in 
funding to develop hi-tech ways of providing "support, business skill 
development, marketing and sales advice" to small businesses (top of the 
list will presumably be "How to apply for a Federal business grant").

Incidentally, while on the subject of small businesses, (the North Sydney-
based HMAA Aust received a $30,000 Federal grant as part of the Small 
Business Enterprise Cultural Program to provide skills development and 
support for owner/managers in the hotel motel industry).

What a strange definition of the word "cultural" must be embedded in that 
sentence!

More corporate welfare was to come, however. In July 2000, Joe Hockey could 
be photographed presenting another North Sydney company, Bullant Pty Ltd, 
with $3.7 million. It's a "commercialisation loan", but I wouldn't hold 
your breath waiting for it to be paid back.

The money will be used (to further develop 21st century technology, putting 
Australia at the cutting edge).

The cliches flow like wine and so does public money into corporate coffers. 
And Joe Hockey is just one Liberal politician out of many, doing his best 
to buy his way back into parliament.

Back to index page