The gentrification of Adelaide
"In the coming year, take a closer look at the improving face and spirit of our city and judge for yourself. " This is an invitation from Adelaide City's Lord Mayor, Alfred Huang, appearing in a full-page advertisement in a recent issue of Adelaide's daily "Advertiser". The ad had appeared several times previously and is part of a marketing campaign costing city residents $230,000. The images chosen to exemplify the "new directions for our city" are of cranes towering over a construction site, well-heeled patrons at a sidewalk cafe, a model of a large scale building project and the obligatory skyline. Absent from the page which carries a booster's slogan "Capacity, Vivacity, Audacity, Our City", is any reference to the needs of working people, let alone the city's marginalised population living in sub- standard accommodation or sleeping rough. The most recent appearance of the advertisement was on the back page of a feature sponsored by the Australian Institute of Management. The 12-page advertising feature contains nothing but the bosses' view of what progress, innovation and excellence might be. The positioning of the ad is no coincidence. A number of recent developments within the city also demonstrate that the City of Adelaide is trying very hard to prove to the corporate sector and to wealthy prospective residents that it has a vision for the city that would appeal to them. Priorities in the latest draft budget with outlays totalling $116 million are "projects" to the value of $44 million, — $6.5 million on an upgrade of North Terrace, $4 million for the Parklands, $2 million on Lake Torrens and $300,000 to be spent on the Rundle Mall shopping precinct,.and so on. Among the "projects" will be the promised high speed, broadband cabling throughout the CBD to attract corporations into the area. No doubt this will cause much excitement the forthcoming 13th World Congress of IT (Information Technology) should Adelaide be chosen to host the gathering. Way down the Council's list, dwarfed by other spending commitments, is an amount of $50,000 to be spent on Aboriginal cultural heritage programs and $35,000 for activities to take place in Victoria Square. The Battle for Victoria Square The two last mentioned items of expenditure have been described by some as a sop to the Aboriginal community. Relations between Council and Aboriginal community have been strained for some time over the use of Victoria Square as a meeting place for the mostly homeless indigenous people. Adelaide City Council provoked community outrage by approaching the State Government to declare a dry zone (no consumption of alcohol outdoors) across the city and North Adelaide. Sensing that the media had set public opinion against those meeting in the square, the State Government weighed in and threatened that, if the City Council didn't declare an alcohol free zone, then it would! In considering this issue, it has to be remembered that it is more than a question of demanding that people not drink in Victoria Square. Over the years the spot has become a meeting place for Aboriginal people and many maintain that it is a traditional meeting place. In any case, it is a focal point for networks within the indigenous community whose members have shouldered more than their fair share of the problems resulting from the social decay around them. A rapid decline in the number of jobs, availability of accommodation, a lack of services including mental health services and increased costs of medication to patients have all taken their toll. In June this year the advocacy group Shelter SA reported that 20,000 people in South Australia are without permanent housing. There are 28,400 households on waiting lists for high priority housing for up 12 months. At the same time, there has been a decline of 11,200 houses from the public housing stock over the last decade. In the same ten-year period, rooming house beds have declined in number from 1,500 to just over 200. Also in June, an announcement was made that a new Commonwealth Law Courts building would be erected on Victoria Square. Projected cost — $76.6 million. Adelaide's unemployment rate remains the highest among the mainland capitals. The "Advertiser" quoted Uni of SA Professor Dick Bandy on the persistence of the problem: "The most distressing part about the SA economy is that although unemployment has fallen, this is not because of a growth in jobs — we have 3,500 fewer people employed since May 2000". The social problems are many. The point to consider in connection with the declaration of a "dry zone" is that Council would much rather that these people be warehoused in far flung northern or southern suburbs rather than deal with the underlying problems. Residents of Adelaide City itself are aware of this situation. In two studies conducted on behalf of the Council by Hassell's and McGregor Tan Marketing, it was found that people living outside the City area (and most likely to have attitudes formed on the basis of media reports alone) supported a dry zone, while those actually living in the City opposed the move. They realise that existing dry zones in the City remain the most dangerous places to visit. Furthermore, Police statistics reveal that during a nine-month period last year, the number of reported offences in Victoria Square (68) was dwarfed by those for North Terrace (819) and North Adelaide (1428). The conclusion that the measure is also racist is unavoidable. Premier John Olsen has announced that a dry zone would be trialled throughout the City from the end of October. There has been a promise of funding to the tune of $500,000 for a "stabilisation" facility to be run by the Salvation Army in Whitmore Square to deal with the alcohol problems of those to be displaced. This undertaking should be put in the category of "I'll believe it when I see it". Similar promises were made as far back as 1996. More effects of the development steamroller Recent developments have also put live music venues throughout the City under threat. According to John Lewis of the Hotels Association, over 21,000 live music gigs take place in the City annually demonstrating mass community support for the entertainment facilities available in the CBD. Changes in land use resulting from Council plans to attract an additional 17,000 residents (with the ability to pay astronomical prices for their accommodation) are causing difficulties for the live music industry. East End hotels like the Crown and Anchor, the Austral, and the Exeter as well as the General Havelock, Grace Emily and the Seven Stars are all the subject of complaints about noise from new inner urban residents. In an attempt to protect the viability of one of the venues, the owner of the Austral, Gosia Schild, brought an action against the Adelaide City Council in the Supreme Court. She was appealing against the approval of a 90-appartment development six metres from the Hotel. The Council listed the development as "category one" which means that other nearby property owners did not get any notification and could not lodge any protests against the proposal. The favourable decision of the Supreme Court has given the Austral a reprieve but the war continues. Over 5000 supporters of live music rallied on the steps of State Parliament last month and gave notice that the Council's heavy handedness and lack of consultation will be challenged. Echoes of the Depression During the 1930s many of the Depression's poorest victims slept rough on the banks of the Torrens River in dwellings made of scraps of corrugated iron, hessian and whatever else could be fashioned into a shelter. Some of capitalism's present day victims still do. But the settlement most reminiscent of those photos from the thirties is located near the cemetery on West Terrace. For over seven months around 30 homeless people have been sleeping in small tents, in vehicles or under the stars. They are of all colours and genders, some have mental and other illnesses, others are destitute due crises such as marriage break-ups. All the street people gathered here want and are trying to get appropriate accommodation and support. Craig's problems are not uncommon among those living on West Terrace. He can't obtain rent assistance from Centrelink. His dealings with the authorities are endlessly complicated by not having a postal address. He suffers with depression and a condition called Barrett's oesophagus. The price of the medication for the condition has recently skyrocketed. He can get two cups of soup, some bread and a pie a day from nearby welfare agencies. He has shed 12 kilos since he became homeless. Eugene and Ina are an Aboriginal couple who regularly pass some of their time at the camp. Their case is quite rare. They recently moved into a house as a result of strenuous efforts on their part and by others helping them. They were without a house for over two years and had slept out on West Terrace for about seven months. They now come to the settlement to express their solidarity with the people there still requiring accommodation. All those sleeping rough are under constant threat of eviction from the City Council. They were given notice to vacate the area several months ago but Council extended the deadline to some indeterminate date in the future after representations from welfare organisations and reaction from the community generally. However, there can be no doubting Council's determination to move these homeless people on. It is only a matter of time before they, too, are shunted elsewhere to enable the City to take on its new guise. This will happen without solving these people's problems or addressing the root causes. Frustration is growing among those working with these marginalised people. Joyce Vandersman of the Adelaide Day Centre for Homeless Persons told "The Guardian" "It makes you sick to the stomach just how inhuman some of the decisions have been." Commenting on the deterioration in the situation, she said,"... the people in positions of power are not as open, they are not listening and sometimes have hidden agendas. They are overriding all access to democratic input. "There just aren't enough people on the ground who are upset and speaking out and being a voice with Aboriginal, vulnerable and homeless people." Readers in other cities might recognise patterns of change in Adelaide in their own hometown. In fact similar developments are taking place in virtually all capitalist societies as a small minority of people, the beneficiaries of economies like our own, try to create an oasis of peace and opulence in the midst of mounting social problems.