Anger and frustration build at Holden
by Bob Briton Workers at Holden's Elizabeth assembly plant in Adelaide are at the limits of their patience with the corporation's unwillingness to agree upon a satisfactory pay deal and acceptable conditions as part of a new Enterprise Bargaining Agreement. Over 4000 Adelaide workers from the day and afternoon shifts walked off the job a fortnight ago in response to the latest offer of a 15.1 percent pay increase over three years. This most recent offer from the company follows on previous ones of 14.75 per cent over three years, then another one of 14.75 per cent with some fiddling of the other detail of the EBA, followed by another offer of 14.9 per cent. It was the last miniscule movement in the increase on offer that blew the lid off workers' anger and caused the walkout, which arose from motions from the floor—not from recommendations from union officials. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union's (AMWU) ambit claim, which was agreed to at a National Conference as part of an Australia-wide campaign, was for a pay increase of 24 per cent over three years. Negotiating teams of union officials and senior shop stewards led by the AMWU had already lowered their claim to 20 per cent then, at meetings held in Melbourne just prior to the walkout, said that a 17.5 per cent increase was the union's minimum position on pay. As can be seen, Holden's offers were not a serious attempt at reaching an agreement and its attitude on other issues has also heightened tensions. Workers are incensed that Holden is holding to its hard-line postion despite profits of $280 million last year, extracted from the efforts of workers. AMWU State Secretary in SA, John Camillo, told The Guardian that the auto maker is also intent on increasing production from 125,000 units a year to 185,000 units as a part of its profits drive. To achieve this Holden wants to increase the "flexibility" of its operations and is pushing, for example, for programmed days off involving the whole plant to become RDOs for individual workers. Workers don't appear to be in the mood to oblige in view of how their previous cooperation has been taken for granted and pocketed. Last July, for example, workers agreed to bring forward some of their annual leave because of a slump in exports to the Middle East. Orders for vehicles had been delayed because of religious observances in some Middle East markets. It appears that you can never be flexible enough for some employers. At the stopwork meetings which led up to the strike, workers pointed out that even troubled manufacturer Mitsubishi was able to offer 14.75 per cent to their workers despite losses to the manufacturer's Australian division of $166 million last year. In response to Holden's constant line about tight margins and the like, some workers suggested that the transnational should take a leaf out of Ford's book. That company has suspended bonuses going to executives from International President Jack Nasser down. Last week Holden contacted the AMWU and said that its previous offer was not the company's bottom line and that it was prepared to offer 15.5 per cent (16.3% for the remainder of the Period of the EBA). The negotiating team rejected the offer but it was put to workplace meetings in Adelaide last Friday. The offer was rejected and it seems likely that it will be rejected by workers at the engine building plant at Fisherman's Bend in Victoria. In another development the so-called "impartial umpire", the Industrial Relations Commission, has declared any further strike action in support of Manusafe (the industry-wide employee entitlement trust fund) to be illegal.