Ansett: Flying fickle finger of blame
by Bob Briton The ACTU's "Keep Ansett Flying" campaign continues with rallies and other actions around Australia. At the time of going to press there was still no reprieve for the 16,000 Ansett workers who had been stood down on September 13 by the Administrator appointed by Air New Zealand. There was however good news for the 1000 employees of Traveland whose doors have reopened under new ownership. An estimated 60,000 jobs are directly or indirectly at risk if the airline does not get back into the air in some form or other. The main priorities of the union campaign are to save as many jobs as possible; maintain Qantas/Ansett wages and conditions; maintain unionisation; and to secure full payment of entitlements. If Ansett employees are made redundant (at present they are stood down, not sacked), they will entitled to payments totalling around $800 million for annual leave, long service leave, payment in lieu of notice and redundancy benefits. That does not include outstanding superannuation payments. Last Friday there were protests around Australia. Vic Williams reports from Perth that up to 4000 Ansett and Sky West workers met at Solidarity Park, called together by Unions WA, and marched to Parliament House. A large group of construction workers from the CFMEU led the march. The Civil Service Association, Miscellaneous Workers Union and others carried their banners. Stephanie Mayman, Assistant Secretary of Unions WA was applauded for union efforts on behalf of airline workers. The meeting cheered when it was announced that the Federal Government had allocated $3.5 million to enable Sky West to be flying almost immediately. Government shortchanges workers Three hundred and fifty leaflets by the Communist Party were well received. The Government, under pressure from the workers and their unions, waived the six-week waiting period for Ansett employees to receive unemployment benefits — the only catch being they must first resign from Ansett. If they resign then they lose the right to redundancy payments! The Government's proposals for payment of entitlements (funded by a $10 tax on airline tickets) will leave most Ansett workers out of pocket by a large amount. The Government has agreed to cover full payment for accrued annual leave and long service leave, but only up to eight weeks of redundancy pay. Claims by Workplace Relations Minister Tony Abbott that the scheme will deliver 100 per cent of entitlements for 90 per cent of workers stretches the truth, said Chris White, Secretary of the United Trades and Labor Council of South Australia. Long serving Ansett employees stand to lose anything up to $80,000 as 100 weeks of redundancy pay is slashed to a maximum of eight weeks' said Mr White. As a result of the political pressures caused by the succession of corporate collapses and the struggles of Ansett and other workers in the automotive industry (the strike at Tristar, for example), the Government has backed off its previous proposals for a Federal scheme where entitlements would be capped at $10,000 in the case of company failure. The $10 levy on airline tickets will remain unless the Australian Government succeeds in recovering the monies from Air New Zealand. In this event, the proceeds of the levy will be "returned to the community". Instead of coming out against privatisation, Labor leader Kim Beazley came up with the bright idea that the Ansett workers' entitlements could be paid from the pile of money to made from the sale of Sydney Airport. He suggested that the facility, even with the gaping hole left by Ansett, would be worth "a motza". It is doubtful that the airport with such a diminished capacity in present economic conditions would fetch earlier estimates of $4 billion. Can Mr Beazley tell us what he would do if the privatised airport went bust and could not operate? This could easily have happened if it had been sold a few months ago. The consortia buying up public enterprises borrow anything up to 90 per cent of the purchase price, have heavy interest payments as well as expectations of fat profits. Meanwhile Dick Smith wants the Federal Government to do more in the current situation to attack standards in the industry which were achieved and maintained by the trade union movement. In a piece carried in the Murdoch press he said that he had been telling industry chiefs "that if the highly unionised, very expensive air traffic control and regulatory systems Australia has had in place since the 1940s remained, they simply wouldn't have a business in future". Former Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke's failure to follow through after breaking the pilots' union in 1989 had greatly disappointed him. Finger of blame While Dick Smith and others are happy to blame unions for all manner of ills in the industry, most of the media interest last week was focused on the apparent incompetence of the Ansett and Air New Zealand Management. Questions need answering. Did Air New Zealand asset-strip Ansett? Did Ansett trade illegaly while insolvent? Did they fail to fully report their economic difficulties to the NZ stock exchange? Should the finger be pointed at the recent owners of Ansett, Murdoch's News Limited and Sir Peter Abeles' TNT, for failing to update the fleet in time and leaving Ansett with the oldest planes among the top 50 airlines in the world? The riskiness of ventures in the industry, the impact on safety standards and the inevitable disruption to the community and people's employment must cause the labour movement, in particular, to respond in a way which is in proportion to the problem. Regardless of the specifics of the actions of the individuals involved, the real cause of this crisis is the capitalism system of private enterprise. Our airports, our airlines, communications, banks, water, electricity and other essential services will never be reliable while privately owned and run for profit. There will always be crashes and no security for workers. Deregulation and privatisation have once again shown to be, quite literally, bankrupt. The labour movement, with the trade unions in the forefront, must organise to achieve a single publicly owned airline to meet community needs, not corporate greed. The Government and the management of Ansett and Air New Zealand have a responsibility to see that no worker is left worse off as a consequence of this crash.