Colombia: Call to continue struggle
Just prior to the elections in Colombia, spokespersons of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People's Army (FARC-EP), issued the following Communique: 1. The month of February 2002 concludes with President Pastrana's declaration of war that put an end to the talks with the FARC-EP, giving rise to a new stage of state violence in national political life, the end result of which no one knows. 2. The presidential decision was taken to satisfy the interests and demands of the liberal-conservative political caste, the business organisations, the paramilitarism under the command of a sector of the police and military high command, the big information media and the US embassy. 3. Hundreds of bombs with 250 and 500 kilos of explosives have been dropped on the area of five municipalities, causing forest fires, destroying highways, bridges, community centres, campesino homes and the murder of three civilians, two of them children, and wounding another four including a pregnant woman. This is a clear expression of the state terrorism being unleashed against the populace and the infrastructure serving the communities, while the insurgency is taken to task for its action in response to the state violence. 4. Now that President Pastrana has unilaterally ruptured the peace process the FARC-EP does not recognise any authority representing the state in these five municipalities, as is the case throughout national territory. 5. We have listened to the declarations of presidential candidates Serpa Uribe, Juan Camilo Restrepo, Uribe Velez and Noemi Sanin speaking as warmongers disguised behind talk of peace. While they take off their hats to hail the presidential decision to rupture the peace process, they talk of imposing conditions on the insurgency for reinitiating the talks under a subsequent government. 6.The proposals made by the candidates to impose conditions on the insurgency, demanding unilateral gestures from it, are a repetition of the formula that brought President Pastrana to rupture the talks. They do not mention at all the need for changes that would benefit the people economically, politically, socially and in defence of national sovereignty. The candidates of liberal-conservative bipartyism are not an alternative since they offer the same thing as always. This is why we are calling on the people not to vote for them or for any of the aspirants to the House of Representatives and the Senate of the Republic throughout the country. None of them is going to legislate in favour of the interests of the people and anyone who tries to will be assassinated, as the recent history of the Patriotic Union demonstrates. 7. For electoral purposes, the same old dirty politicians, with the President at their head, visited San Vicente del Caguan three days after the rupture, offering to resolve problems and construct projects they had not acted on after three-and-a-half years in government. 8. Included in the presidential entourage in San Vicente del Caguan were US military personnel, leaving no doubt about who is giving the orders Pastrana submissively carries out to unfold the anti-patriotic "Plan Colombia". 9. Now, eight days after the rupture of the peace process, it is clear the Colombian people do not want war. War has always been imposed upon it from above by the liberal-conservative oligarchy as a way to perpetuate its class privileges, to guarantee economic measures favouring the rich and to swell the profits of the military-industrial complex, while they drown 33 million of our compatriots in poverty. 10. We call upon the Colombian people to continue the struggle in an organised manner to win peace with social justice and full sovereignty, as we propose in the Platform for a Government of National Reconciliation and Reconstruction. Raul Reyes Joaquin Gomez Carlos Antonio Lozada Simon Trinidad Andres Paris