Foxtel-Optus: Disappearing up their own merger
by Marcus Browning The proposed Foxtel-Optus merger will threaten cross-subsidisation of telecommunications to rural and remote areas and undermine local programming content. At the same time it will put Rupert Murdoch and Kerry Packer in an even more powerful position in media and telecommunications, where they already occupy a dominant position. Telstra's broadband cable system is to be the conduit through which packaged deals of pay television, Internet, and mobile and fixed telephone services will be offered. From November 1 all Optus programs will be available on Foxtel and all Foxtel programs will be available on Optus. Subscribers will get discounts on programs, Internet and telephone (both land line and mobile) if they take a bundle of these services together. This is not only the latest part of the push for pay-for-view customers. In practice it begins the process of eroding Telstra's universal service obligations by discriminating against those telephone users who do not take pay television packages from the merged entity. Rural and remote areas will now be hit with higher prices for Internet and pay television than their city cousins. The way is now well and truly open for the next step in the deregulation of telecommunications i.e. dumping Telstra's cross-subsidisation program that ensures everyone pays the same price for their telephone calls. Part of the drive to monopoly is related to the nature of pay television itself. From the beginning it was clear that most people were not going to pay for something they currently got for nothing, free-to-air broadcasting. High rating programs on free-to-air are now on pay-for-view — including the most popular sports. The packaging of these programs with the other forms of communication technology by exploiting Telstra's unique, taxpayer-funded system, provides a further "incentive" to buy — in the guise of "choice" — what comes free. In the not-too-distant future all high rating programs, with their huge advertising dollars, will appear exclusively on pay television. As far as local content is concerned, there will be no reason for Packer and Murdoch to keep up the quota of locally made programs, let alone increase it. This will have a big impact on local filmmakers and production companies which are already taking a battering from Murdoch's Hollywood- based Fox conglomerate. "We have a fundamental concern that, whoever the service providers are, they provide the appropriate levels of local content", said the Chief Executive of the Australian Film Commission, Kim Dalton. "It's not acceptable to go to the Australian people and say Australia cannot afford Australian content on pay-TV." The Executive Director of the Screen Producers' Association, Joanne Yates, noted: "Even if Foxtel is committing money to drama, they'll do it through their own in-house production." The "M" word is being avoided like the plague, but a marriage between Packer 's PBL, Murdoch's News Ltd, Singapore Telecommunications' Optus, and Telstra can be nothing other than a monopoly. But if you listen to Telstra, Foxtel and Optus, there'll be no monopoly, no price hikes and no one disadvantaged, part of a "everything's apples, mate" PR exercise. Telstra Chief Executive, Ziggy Switkowski: "The bundling of telephone, internet and subscription TV services on a single customer- convenient bill will allow Telstra to discount prices and reward customer loyalty." Foxtel CEO Kim Williams: "These agreements will give more Australians more choices about "how to receive Foxtel" and will lead to greater competition in subscription television and telephony." (Control of Telstra's broadband technology will allow the merger to decide what other communication companies have access and at what price.) Optus CEO Chris Anderson: "This cleans up a structurally flawed business "so we can compete more" at the local loop and telephony level rather than being content-disadvantaged." The Financial Review's editorial on March 6, in the spirit of "everything' s apples, mate", stated, "Yesterday's announcement by Foxtel and Optus of an agreement to cut their losses on programming while still competing on delivery platforms is to be welcome." There it is: they disappear up their own merger by monopolising "and" competing at the same time! The Optus-Foxtel deal increases the concentration of ownership and control of every aspect of Australia's telecommunications system in the hands of two ruthless, profit-grubbing and anti-democratic media moguls. It is bad news for the economy, for workers and their jobs, and heralds the implementation of the Howard Government's plan to fully privatise Telstra.