Culture and Life
by Rob Gowland
On our side?
In the classic films of the American director Frank Capra — films like You Can't Take It With You, American Madness, It Happened One Night and State of the Union — capitalists are portrayed not as decent people, but as potentially decent people. Bankers, industrialists and assorted millionaires invariably see the light, usually through contact with ordinary people, and become human. It's a fairy tale of course. It went down well during the dark days of the Depression, but it remains a fairy tale. But sometimes capitalists do things that, just for a moment, make you think that Frank might have been right. One such event happened recently in the Sydney suburb of Botany. The people of the area and green groups have been fighting a determined rearguard action against a company called Orica that wants to install a toxic waste disposal facility in the suburb. Orica has had a plant at Botany Industrial Park for some 20 years, and in all that time has apparently put the matter of disposing of its toxic waste in the too hard basket. Now the company is faced with the problem of disposing of its accumulated waste: a mere 60,000 barrels (ten thousand tonnes) of carcinogenic Hexachlorobenzene (HCB). Orica decided their best option was to burn it using the GeoMelt process. Basically, that is to use a superheated furnace. To complete the task, the furnace would have to be in continuous use 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for five years! Needless to say, the local residents did not welcome this proposal with the kind of enthusiasm that the company probably hoped for. Supposedly just the thing for disposing of volatile chemical waste, heavy metals and other toxic garbage, GeoMelt's very high temperature furnace was touted (in a report Orica commissioned) as ultra safe and non-polluting. But those pesky green groups were unconvinced. Greenpeace toxics campaigner Matt Ruchel pointed out that Orica's "bucket chemistry" (GeoMelt) was commercially untested and had failed in trials in South Australia and the US. On several occasions the plants used in the trials actually exploded, and apparently outbreaks of fire were common. But the company (and presumably their friends in government) were not unduly worried. After all, Planning NSW, the commercially-named government department responsible for overseeing this sort of thing, had expressed itself contented with the report that Orica had commissioned, which basically told how the plant would run if all went well. Greenpeace was leading the fight to stop the GeoMelt furnace, but it looked like too little too late, until the US transnational Kellogg's came riding up, as unlikely a white knight for the environment as could be imagined. Suddenly Orica and the NSW government were confronted by an array of Kellogg's high-priced lawyers waving injunctions and declaring themselves highly dissatisfied as to the furnace's safety. Planning NSW promptly backed away, calling for another report from Orica (still an internal report, however). Meanwhile, the job that the government body should be doing is being left to a transnational corporation: Kellogg's are being left to wield the big stick on behalf of the community and the environment. Frank Capra would have been pleased. Except that the corporation's altruism was not caused by the influence of Capra's "little people" — by which he meant "ordinary working stiffs", not Irish Leprechauns, incidentally. Why is Kellogg's involved then? Because their factory is less than 500 metres from the proposed toxic waste furnace. I can just see the Kellogg's executives sitting around the Board table debating how they will counter a Sanitarium ad campaign "Our rice bubbles are not produced next to a toxic waste dump". Visions of snide jokes about "Free cancer test kit or radio-active toy in every pack of Corn Flakes" would be dancing before their eyes. Then there is the potential for lawsuits from their employees if the company takes no action and subsequently employees come down with cancers traceable to Orica's toxic waste disposal. Frankly, Kellogg's has lots to lose and nothing to gain from the GeoMelt furnace going ahead. I am sure, if Orica's plant had been elsewhere in Sydney, far enough away not to have any adverse effects on Kellogg's market share, the transnational food giant would have been a non-participant in this battle.