Editorial:
Reaction at work
The slanderous attack by Howard Government front bencher and Parliamentary Secretary Bill Heffernan on High Court Judge Michael Kirby has to be seen in the light of the Government's broader agenda. Heffernan's hate-filled tirade is in fact a deliberately orchestrated assault on the independence of the judiciary and, in particular, on a progressive judge. The fact that it is a deliberate move is indicated by the failure of Howard and Attorney General, Daryl Williams to support Kirby. The Government will use the event as a pretext to give themselves more control over the legal system. If Justice Kirby could be removed, a conservative judge could replace him and, thereby, give the extreme conservative forces more control over the High Court. It is no coincidence that this move comes as legislation, in the guise of anti-terrorism measures, is before Parliament. The legislation represents an attack of unprecedented depth and breadth on our basic civil and democratic rights. Far-reaching and draconian powers are being handed to the military and the spy agencies ASIO, ASIS and the Defence Signals Directorate, as well as to the Federal Police. Since its election in 1996 the Government, in league with some of the most reactionary sections of big business, has been conducting a war of attrition on democratic rights. No institution, service, organisation or collective that contributes in any way to progressive and democratic ideals and practices has escaped being put to the sword. Cuts have been made to welfare payments across the board using a variety of means. The unemployed are hit with major penalties for the slightest infringement of a raft of rules, some of them so extreme in their demands that they are logistically and financially impossible to meet for many jobless people. All this with the work-for-the-dole cheap labour scheme hanging over their heads. Family payments, home carers, disability pensioners — every aspect of welfare has gone under the knife. Parts of the welfare system have been contracted out to Christian charities. The Church-based groups themselves have been exposed as rorting the system, claiming job placement fees for non-existent jobs in order to boost their profits. The Royal Commission into the Building Industry is just the latest attack on the trade union movement. In its own way it is as ferocious an attack as the notorious attempt to destroy the Maritime Union in 1998. The anti-union Workplace Relations Act has been reinforced with increased penalties that strengthen the boss's whip hand by giving employers more leeway to impose individual work contracts and eliminate collective bargaining. The restructure of the tax system, with the inequitable GST, has placed a heavier tax burden on working people and eased even further the featherweight corporate tax load. The Government has gutted native title legislation and slashed funding for Indigenous health, education and housing. The Government's inhumane immigration policy — mandatory detention and the setting up of prison camps in various Pacific island states — has been condemned internationally and is opposed by a growing number of Australians. Rape crisis centres, legal aid, childcare, education, the ABC, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Medicare, the Commonwealth Public Service can all be included in this long list of targets being attacked. The Howard Government is reactionary, dangerous and holds extremely conservative social views. It is an extremely class-conscious government, serving the interests and dictates of big business. The existing two-party system in which government is alternately shared between the Liberal-National Coalition and the Labor Party protects and perpetuates the rule of the major corporations over Australia's economic and political life. It is necessary to build a left-oriented, politically progressive force strong enough to challenge and break the two-party stranglehold and establish a new type of government which will implement "people friendly" economic, political, social and foreign policies. This alternative will arise out of the demands and mass actions of the working people. The creation of a left/progressive political alternative is an essential task. Such a new type of popular government would have a mandate to substantially curb the power of the corporations. It would be democratic and multi-party and would take steps against corporate monopoly domination to introduce a program of policies in the interests of working people.Back to index page