Government sinking in refugee policy quagmire
by Peter Mac The Howard Government has got into further difficulties with its cruel and inhumane approach to asylum seekers: its contempt for the judiciary, its attempts to excise Australian territories and apparent contempt for the small island state of Nauru. Leading members of the judiciary have for a long time expressed grave misgivings about the wisdom and justice of the Government's asylum seeker policy. Last year the Government introduced legislation removing the rights of asylum seekers to appeal to the Federal Court over adverse decisions by migration tribunals. Last week Justice Hill of the Australian Federal Court incurred the government's wrath for stating that human rights and freedoms of Australian citizens were at risk from a government that was contemptuous of the judiciary. Neatly proving Justice Hill's point, Immigration Minister Philip Ruddock immediately declared that, in effect, the judiciary should keep its nose out of political matters. He declared with lofty disdain that judges who wished to do so should "resign from the bench and stand for parliament." Ruddock's remarks were then subjected to severe criticism by the Law Council of Australia and the Australian Bar Association. He later expressed regret that his comments had been "misconstrued" — after receiving advice that his statement could be interpreted as an attempt to influence the court. (The Federal Court is currently hearing a number of cases involving the Minister and his portfolio.) Just to clarify exactly what he really meant, Ruddock soon afterwards launched into another attack on the judiciary, and justice Hill in particular. The Government has always defended its asylum seeker policy as entirely consistent with international standards. However, Justice Louis Joinet, the head of the UN's special Working Party on Arbitrary Detention, is said to have been shocked at the conditions he found on a recent visit to Australian detention centres. The Government was acutely embarrassed by revelations of conditions in the centres. The most recent of these concerns a woman inmate of the Woomera centre whose argument with a camp guard resulted in her being forcibly interned with her children in the camp's solitary confinement area. Joinet expressed deep concern about the mandatory detention of children and other vulnerable individuals. He commented acidly that criminals were treated better in Australia than asylum seekers, who suffered from living day in and day out with agonising uncertainty about their eventual release, which eventually resulted in a "collective depression syndrome". He also issued trenchant criticism of the detention management system, in particular the government's policy of awarding management contracts to private prison organisations. Foreign Minister Downer's response was to declare defensively and belligerently that Australia's policy was never going to be determined by "outsiders" and "Geneva bureaucrats". As for the Government's attempts to excise certain island territories, ALP leader Simon Crean was critical because it would not achieve the Government's objective, refugees would simply travel further to the mainland. Greens Senator Bob Brown pointed out that the logical next step would be the excision of parts of the Australian mainland. The UN Refugee Convention is intended to apply to all territory within a nation's borders. Senator Brown pointed out that the Government's refugee policy may well be in breach of the Refugee Convention, which states that refugees are entitled to the same access to the host country's legal processes as its own citizens, and forbids discrimination on the basis of method of arrival in the country. The Australian Senate has the power to block the excision legislation. Senator Brown has indicated that the Greens will continue to oppose the Government's policies. The ALP's position remains unclear. Crean stated last week that it would not be determined until they had received a briefing from the Prime Minister! The Government's credibility was further dented last week when Nauruan President Rene Harris declared that the Australian Government's "Pacific solution" was turning into a "Pacific nightmare". President Harris asserted that the Australian Government had asked his Government to accept the refugees until May, but nothing had been heard from Canberra since the deadline expired. Moreover, the promised shiploads of provisions that Australia had offered as payment for Nauruan hospitality had largely failed to materialise.