TV Programs Worth Watching,
Sunday June 16 to Saturday June 22
As a boy, I was given one birthday a copy of Shackleton's Argonauts, Frank Hurley's excellent account of Ernest Shackleton's extraordinary but abortive Antarctic expedition of 1914-16. Hurley was the photographer and cine-cameraman for the expedition. I still have the book, which is illustrated with some of Hurley's glass plate photographs which he personally rescued from their ship, the Endurance, by repeatedly diving into the freezing water as the ship lay crushed in the ice and half submerged. Shackleton's idea had been to make the first crossing of the Antarctic continent, hopefully naming new lands and mountains as they went. In fact, the expedition came to grief in the pack ice without ever landing on Antarctica at all. The Endurance became trapped in the ice. Without a working radio, they were prisoners on board, drifting with the ice for the next ten months. Near the end of the year the ship was finally crushed by the ice and the crew had to take to the ice. For six more months they dragged three life boats across the ice towards the ocean. When they finally reached open water they rowed and sailed the lifeboats across 160 kilometres to freezing, desolate Elephant Island. But it soon became clear that waiting for rescue was futile, so Shackleton and five other men took one of the lifeboats and set out to sail it over a thousand kilometres through mountainous seas to the whaling station on South Georgia Island. When they miraculously arrived on South Georgia, they were on the wrong side of the island and had to scale a hitherto unexplored glacier to reach the whaling station. Shackleton finally arrived back at Elephant Island to successfully rescue the 21 men who had survived on a windswept beach under two upturned lifeboats, five months after he set sail from there. His expedition of exploration had become an epic of survival and human courage (not to mention navigation). He didn't discover any new mountains for the glory of the British Empire but it was an extraordinary story none the less. Charles Sturridge, the multi-award winning writer-director of Longitude, has chosen to tell the story of Shackleton's expedition as the first production of his new company, Firstsight Films, set up on the strength of Longitude's success. A two-part mini-series, Shackleton (ABC 8.30pm Sundays) is in every way a quality production. The cast is large and splendidly talented, Henry Braham's photography is first rate, and Sturridge's directing is up to his previous standard. Kenneth Branagh plays Shackleton, while Phoebe Nicholls — she of the weak mouth — makes a more sympathetic than usual job of portraying his put upon wife Emily (when Shackleton was not dashing off exploring he was apparently none too discretely seeing his mistress, played by Embeth Davidtz). Among the large cast of excellent actors, Matt Day plays a brash Frank Hurley and Kevin McNally the ship's captain reduced by Shackleton to being little more than first mate on his own ship. Shot in Greenland under trying conditions, the film looks remarkably convincing, while the period scenes in Britain are evocative and authentic looking (except for the usual faults: everything looks new and there is a total absence of grime). Indeed, my only real criticism is of Sturridge's dialogue: too much of it sounds studied, as if uttered in the expectation of being quoted. Surely people did not and do not really speak like that outside of their own memoirs? All in all, however, despite some imperialist trappings (there's even an unconvincing scene with George V on the eve of WW1 mouthing platitudes about the grave responsibility of sending men to their deaths in war), this is a series that is definitely worth seeing. Quality television all (or at least most of) the way. I have quoted before the famous definition of a philanthropist — "someone who gives away what he should be giving back" — but it is certainly relevant to any consideration of Manhattan Charity, this week's offering on True Stories (ABC 10:00pm Thursday). The ABC's publicity material says of the program: "Manhattan Charity follows the lives of five characters who all belong to the same social elite that finances and controls New York's most prestigious cultural and educational institutions." "Their lives are made up of grandiose charity balls, endless calls for help, board meetings, site visits to their 'protigis' in Harlem and the Bronx and evenings spent celebrating their generosity. "Part do-gooders, part socialites, the five have earned their right to redistribute their money any way they like." Oh no they haven't. In the first place, it's not "their" money. No matter how they "earned" it, their wealth is in fact the result of the robbery of the poor. By ostentatiously giving a small part of it away, they are attempting to absolve themselves of any guilt. Wealth, instead of being obscene, becomes a "public benefit" that can be worn as a badge of honour. Just try making them disgorge a penny more than they wish to dole out to their carefully chosen "protigis" and you will soon see how philanthropic they are. Tom Jones (ABC 11:10pm Fridays), the TV series of Henry Fielding's classic satirical 18th century novel is less of a romp than Tony Richardson's 1963 movie version, but it is a somewhat more faithful adaptation and free of the jokey quirks that Richardson sprinkled though his film. The series is also free of the annoyingly arch music score that forces itself on your attention throughout the film version. On the other hand, the series could have benefitted from some of the movie's verve. Fielding's story of the illegitimate son of a servant girl and his romance with the daughter of a neighbouring squire is rife with barbs aimed at the moral hypocrisy of the age which late 20th century productions can safely poke even more fun at.