Capitalism's loot and plunder
by Anna Pha Turn on the news, and its odds on that stock markets will have taken another dive or have shot-up again. There is almost daily news that yet another US corporation has gone bust leaving its employees high and dry or has just revised its profits downwards by a billion or so dollars. If you are lucky you might catch the corporate shredders working overtime as company executives race to hide their crimes and incompetence. Wall Street has taken a hammering. The value of stock is down by 48 per cent since March 2000 — what amounts to a staggering loss in share market value of US$8 trillion (A$14.8 trillion). To put this enormous loss into perspective, it is more than 20 times the Gross Domestic Product of Australia. And half of that loss — US$4 trillion — occurred in the past few months. Stockmarkets in Britain and across Asia have tumbled. Australia has not been immune either, with the big banks and insurance companies among the latest to feel the cold winds of economic instability. Enron, Global Crossing, Tyco, Xerox, WorldCom, Ansett, HIH, and many others have all been hit. "Forbes" magazine reports that nearly a quarter of its top 500 shareholding companies made losses last year. The 27 telecoms remaining on its list (there were many casualties) declared losses totalling US$64 billion last year, and only one of nine airlines declared a profit. While some companies have gone under because of trading difficulties, a large number were brought down by the many and varied speculative, fraudulent, and corrupt practices of their directors and senior management. They helped themselves to billions of dollars and left their companies riddled with debts and drained of assets. Politicians, regulators and judges were bought off. Workers lost their jobs, entitlements and retirement savings. Major banks are now under a question mark. JP Morgan Chase and the Citigroup have come to the attention of investors because of their role in Enron. Other banks are no doubt up to their necks in other Enrons. There are concerns about the security of outstanding loans. Closer to home, ANZ has revealed an exposure of $232 million to the troubled telco Marconi. There are fears that the banks, especially the big four, have other exposures that could result in heavy losses. The insurance companies are also under question. Falling share prices and bankruptcies could wipe their asset base. Insurance companies rely heavily on company investments for their profits. Casino economy At stake are not only the funds of the extremely wealthy but of millions of workers and retirees whose savings are now tied up on stockmarkets. The structure of savings and investment capital has undergone a revolution over the last 15 to 20 years. The risk has largely shifted from the financial institution to the people with savings. Instead of banks holding deposits and guaranteeing (as far as is possible) a fixed income and the repayment of the deposit, workers and retirees are being encouraged into investment packages. The financial institution makes profit out of fees for managing their savings, without guaranteeing a return or even the repayment of the money invested. The amount of income and money left in the end will depend on the honesty of the financial institution or the luck of the markets. It's a big gamble. At the same time as the savings of workers and retirees are being gambled, there are other important changes in the primary methods by which wealth is being accumulated by big business. Parasitic Speculation plays a much bigger role. Enron is a good example. While on the surface it was one of the largest energy companies in the world, Enron was, in reality, a powerful financial institution, trading in "virtual" electricity and not beholden to the laws governing the financial sector. Workers lost their jobs and billions of dollars of their savings were milked when Enron collapsed. The transnational corporations (TNCs), particularly in the finance sector, have generated new "industries" that amount to pure gambling and speculation. A typical bank would have once made almost a 100 percent of its profits from interest rate margins (the difference charged to borrowers and paid to lenders). Now it might only raise a third of its income from interest rate margins, another third from pure speculative activities and the remainder from fees for providing (previously free) service and advice to customers. Boom built on debt Frederick Clairmont, writing in Third World Resurgence (Jan-Feb 2001) warned that the US economy was facing a meltdown. "It's long boom which caused some of its admirers to dub it as 'a miracle economy', was built on a foundation of foreign debt. As foreign investor confidence wanes and the inflows of capital necessary to sustain this essentially parasitic economy dry up, the US economy will be in the throws of a severe crisis which will have a devastating impact on an already faltering world economy", said Dr Clairmont. He pointed out that from 1994 to 1999, the US stockmarket capitalisation had hit unprecedented and cataclysmic heights, rocketing from 81 percent to 184 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This "miracle" was fuelled by foreign direct investment and the purchase of US treasury bonds and other US securities. In recent years, before the present decline in stock values commenced, more than 25 per cent (one in four dollars) of foreign global investment was invested in the US. The US economy is by far the world's biggest debtor and the flight of capital from the US as investors pull out of the share market and sell securities will have disastrous consequences, not only for the US economy but for the economies around the world. At the same time as stockmarkets were inflated the real earnings of US production workers were falling. Dr Clairmont quotes a fall of 14 percent in the real earnings of workers in the private sector between 1973 and 1995. It is not just the US economy that is living on credit. Millions of people in countries such as the US and Australia are also living on credit on a day-to-day basis as they lose their jobs or find their wages squeezed. Third world countries are faced with crippling unpayable debts which are draining their economies of what little they have. The attack on workers' wages and hence the purchasing power of workers has been accompanied by a massive attack on working conditions. There has been a classic crisis of "overproduction" whereby the workers who are producing more and more, are being paid less and less and, as a result, are not able to purchase all that is produced. But this global crisis of overproduction is only one aspect of the crisis. The big corporations which have been awash with capital, have sought to use their capital in other, non-productive, ways to acquire even more wealth. They have turned to mergers and takeovers, to buying up public assets as they are privatised, speculating on futures' markets, currencies and anything else they could find to gamble with. This "growth" had no relationship to the real underlying economy and was of no benefit to working people. It was money that could have been spent on higher wages, better working conditions, shorter working hours and, most importantly, job creation. Not only was the exploitation of working people increased but many were thrown out of their jobs. Economic rationalist (neo-liberal) policies gave TNCs a free run to do what they liked where they liked whenever they liked. Rotten to core The capitalist system is facing a long and deep economic crisis which could have extremely serious political and ideological consequences for capitalism. Will it be as bad as the 1930s? The greatest fear of governments is the threat that such a crisis and the unchecked fraudulent and corrupt behaviour of managements will lead many to question the credibility of the capitalist system itself. They fear the loss of investor confidence and the subsequent withdrawal of billions of dollars of savings from the stockmarkets of the world. The people of Argentina demanded their money. The banks refused to pay out. "My administration will do everything in our power to end the days of cooking the books, shading the truth, and breaking our laws", said US President George W Bush. Australia's Prime Minister John Howard is equally anxious to ensure investors stay with the market. "There is a strength and resilience and a stability about the Australian economy which is very important", Howard said. They fear not only a mass exodus from stockmarkets but the pressures that are mounting for strict regulations to curb and control the operations of the corporate sector. The present situation is unsustainable economically, socially and politically. The big corporations and governments are now caught between curbing some of the excesses of monopoly capital and, at the same time, giving them maximum freedom and power to squeeze monopoly profits out of the system. It has reached a point where the priority question (for the capitalist class) is the protection of the capitalist system itself. The massive crisis facing capitalism and mounting opposition to the policies and effects of the crisis have to be resolved. It is no longer adequate to voice confidence or to say that there is no alternative. It is in these conditions that capitalist governments are resorting to more and more oppressive, authoritarian measures to prevent any resistance or even criticism of the system's failings. Just as sections of capital resorted to fascist measures during the 1930s' depression, capitalist governments are preparing the way now with repressive anti-democratic legislation to yet again repress opposition and retain the rule of capital. It is becoming more and more pressing that the various left and progressive democratic forces unite locally and globally to curb the powers of the transnational corporations. To achieve this new type governments are required — governments that will give priority to the needs of the people not the needs of the corporations. Trade unions and various community groups, environmentalists, indigenous peoples, small farmers, small business people are all victims of this savage and brutal system. United, they can bring about fundamental change so that governments, not private monopolies, govern and economies serve the people.