Culture and Life
by Rob Gowland
Crisis on the land — again
The propensity of farmers to grumble is well known. Pont devoted one of his famous cartoons for Punch to this very subject. But right now in Australia they have every right to grumble. Large parts of Eastern Australia (including 80 per cent of NSW) are now affected by drought. Suppliers of hay are rationing the quantity each customer can have. My wife and I are dependent on deliveries of hay from the Upper Hunter to feed our alpacas and our deer and to augment the natural feed of our horses and goats. Lucerne hay prices however have jumped from around $7 a bale to $14 a. bale. The prices of all other forms of fodder, grain, etc, have also jumped dramatically. (Capitalists like to call that "the law of supply and demand", but it's really nothing more than usury.) But even as the price of fodder climbs and the available supply plummets, we can count ourselves among the lucky ones. We have only a relatively few animals so hopefully will be able to get enough fodder of one sort or another to scrape by. But what of farmers who are dependent on their livestock for a living? (Real farmers as opposed to hobby farmers.) Large flocks need a lot of hay if there is no grass, and right now there is no grass. Even if they can get sufficient hay, the cost will be crippling. All superfluous stock has been or is being sent to the abattoirs in haste but, not surprisingly under capitalism's chaotic market system, stock prices have plummeted. The ABC reports that "for the cost of a pack of cigarettes, people can now buy up to 20 sheep". But, of course, they have no grass for them. Two weeks ago, the NSW Government announced a "drought assistance package". The package is one of the things farmers are justifiably grumbling about. Instead of offering drought-affected farmers some cash to tide them over, to be spent as the farmer wished, the government offered two very specific subsidies: one for the transport of domestic water (i.e. for people, not for stock) and the other for the transport of stock to the abattoirs for slaughter. But farmers and graziers want help to keep their breeding herds and flocks alive, not help to kill them. The NSW Government's approach echoes that of John Howard, that paragon of humanity: let the religious charities take care of it. Last week NSW Agriculture (the body that in less corporatised times was known as the NSW Dept of Agriculture) was given the task of holding talks with major charities to find out "what assistance they will need to help people in drought-affected areas of the state". Even the Salvation Army, normally an enthusiastic supporter of the Howard Government's right-wing social agenda, knew that the answer to that question was simple: "the best thing the Government can give is money", said their spokesman. The Sallies' rural chaplain Bill Sweeting told the ABC: "There hasn't been a lot of demand on us yet but it [the drought crisis] is about to kick right in, to put people under extreme stress." The Carr Government in NSW got such a serve from country areas over the "drought assistance package" that Bob Carr has had to convene a drought round-table in Dubbo. This will presumably be "after" NSW Agriculture's new official drought coordinator, Geoff File, gives a "drought briefing" to a full meeting of state Cabinet in late August. The Cabinet meeting will be at Cobar, in the West of the State, so rural people will know their interests are being taken care of. Won't they? Carr now acknowledges that the subsequent round-table will have to consider such things as breeding stock, fodder and water for stock purposes. It will presumably also have to deal with the crucial question of farm debt. Farmers live on credit and blind Freddy could see that a moratorium on debt would be the single most effective and helpful measure the government could initiate. It doesn't look like Carr is keen to go down that route, however. In fact, Labor has left it to the Liberal-National Party opposition in NSW to meet the heads of the major banks to call for a moratorium on interest as well as delayed interest repayments for farmers. Nevertheless, the banks will be included in the round-table, together with small business, local government and various rural lobby groups. The banks, as you would expect of such bastions of capitalism, have already indicated that their assistance is limited to measures that do not impact adversely on their bottom line. The Australian Bankers Association (ABA) announced that a number of banks would provide special drought "concessions", such as delaying loan repayments and increasing credit card limits. (Which I assume means that people who can't pay off their existing loans can go further into debt via their credit cards.) The ABA's Chief Executive, David Bell, said "Generally speaking the bank and the farmer or rural business can work very closely together to see, for example, if a short-term loan can help with cash flows, to see whether debt repayments can be rescheduled in the short term or making interest only payments for a short period of time". Big of them, don't you think?. "We will also identify if the farmer or rural business has any other financial reserves or investments, [on] which they can call." Presumably so that they, too, can be put at the disposal of the banks when the drought crisis is over.