The Guardian August 14, 2002


Health activists ask UNICEF to dump McDonald's

by Jim Lobe

An international coalition of public-health professionals and activists has 
asked the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) to stop "lending its good 
name and endorsement to McDonald's" and cancel its participation with the 
fast-food giant in World Children's Day on November 20.

The request, which came in the form of a letter sent Wednesday to UNICEF's 
executive director, Carol Bellamy, charged that McDonald's "is a global 
leader in the marketing of junk food that is creating soaring rates of 
childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes, and that is disrupting traditional 
ways of food preparation in families and cultures."

"It is truly a challenge to see how this partnership with McDonald's is 
consistent with UNICEF's claim to promote 'good nutrition' to the world's 
children."

The letter was signed by some 75 public-health and consumer advocates, 
including Jill Claybrook, the head of Public Citizen, several board members 
of Physicians for Social Responsibility, and Michael Jacobsen, executive 
director of the Center for Science in Public Interest.

UNICEF and McDonald's announced plans on July 19, World Children's Day, to 
benefit Ronald McDonald House Charities (RMHC) and UNICEF programs in a 
dozen countries.

RMHC has awarded more than US$320 million in grants for children's health 
over the past two decades, including US$5 million to UNICEF last year for 
the agency's maternal and neonatal tetanus programs in 57 countries.

McDonald's Chairman, Jack Greenberg, met with UN Secretary-General Kofi 
Annan, who has strongly encouraged such "public-private partnerships" to 
support children and other global initiatives.

On November 20 — the anniversary of the UN adoption of the Convention on 
the Rights of the Child in 1989 — McDonald's 30,000 restaurants in 121 
countries are supposed to organise activities and promotions designed to 
raise money and public support for local children's organisations, as well 
as RMHC and UNICEF operations.

Among examples cited by McDonald's will be the distribution in October of 
20 million traditional orange "Trick-or-Treat for UNICEF" collection boxes 
for US children who go door-to-door on Halloween.

In China, the two sponsors will run the country's first-ever online 
concert, access to which will be given away to customers who buy a Big Mac 
on November 20. A portion of the sales will go to UNICEF.

But the health activists' letter, which was organised by Portland Oregon-
based Commercial Alert, argues that the UN agency, whose main purpose is to 
promote children's health and well-being, should not be seen as endorsing 
McDonalds' operations.

"McDonald's", according to the letter, "is responsible for multi-million 
dollar ad campaigns that prod children to nag, whine and throw tantrums so 
that their parents will consent to buy them junk food."

"It is not the proper role of UNICEF to endorse or serve as enabler for 
corporate activities of this kind", the letter declares.

The fast-food restaurant chain, the world's largest by far, serves some 46 
million people daily around the world. Its "golden arches" are one of the 
world's most recognised commercial logos.

Speaking about the fundraising event, McDonald's spokesperson Lisa Howard 
said that the company's only objective is to help children, citing 50 years 
of giving back to communities and working with numerous organisations in 
support of families and children everywhere.

Howard also added that Commercial Alert's criticism of the unhealthiness of 
McDonald's food was unfounded.

"We provide a full menu of choice and variety, and serve wholesome and 
nutritious options — chicken, bread, potatoes, beef, salad, milk, juice 
and other basic foods that come from many of the same trusted suppliers 
that stock grocery store shelves and home pantries.

"Unfortunately this group is absolutely ignorant about our principles, and 
our long-standing commitment to the health and well-being of children", she 
said.

Telephone requests by OneWorld for comment by UNICEF were not returned.

* * *
OneWorld US

Back to index page