The Guardian August 21, 2002


Dumped like used goods

by Nathan Barnes

Two years ago the Australian women's soccer team, the Matildas, posed for a 
nude calendar in order to attract sponsorship money in the lead-up to the 
Sydney 2000 Games. The Australian Women's Soccer Association (later Women's 
Soccer Australia) had received $1.15 million from the Australian Sports 
Commission in 1999, and another $700,000 for their participation in the 
Olympics.

An investigation is now underway after Federal Police were called in 
following the disappearance of computer files and other equipment at the 
Association's offices in Canberra.

Soccer's umbrella body, Soccer Australia, has asked police to also "look at 
allegations of suspected missing funds": $1.5 million is believed to have 
gone missing.

The slide into liquidation ended in the ACT Supreme Court which last week 
wound up Women's Soccer Australia, which still owes its lawyers $70,000.

All scheduled matches for the Matildas have been cancelled and they may 
have to drop out of next year's Women's World Cup in China.

One of the players said that "questions need to be asked about what 
happened to the funding in the two years leading up to the 2000 Olympics."

At the time of the nude calendar, involving 12 of the team, the 
Association's then chief executive, Warren Fisher, was full of 
entrepreneurial enthusiasm, describing one of the photos as "startling, 
sexual, provocative, predatory".

The calendar sold for $24.95, with $1 from each calendar sale going to the 
players who posed.

It transpires now that the Matildas have been exploited in pretty much 
every way possible. Playing in a sport that does not rake in the billions 
from corporations, they compete basically as amateurs.

With lousy funding from the government having forced them to use their 
bodies to acquire desperately-needed money, their Association has now been 
ripped off and wrapped up, and the players dumped like used goods.

What does that say about the status of women in this society and the 
violating and ruthless nature of the system we live under?

Back to index page