The Guardian October 9, 2002


Opposition to US war growing quickly

Massive anti-war demonstrations in Italy, Greece and in the US over the 
weekend continued the build-up of opposition to the planned American 
invasion of Iraq.

In Italy an estimated 1.5 million people took part in demonstrations 
in many Italian cities. Italy's neo-fascist Prime Minister, Silvio 
Berlusconi, together with Tony Blair is among the few allies openly 
supporting the US war plans.

"Our point is that we cannot support the United State's plan to kill 
innocent Iraqis in order to win the upcoming (US) elections", said Marco 
Filiberti who was among the estimated 200,000 demonstrators in Rome.

One teacher said: "We cannot control what the United States does, but we 
can tell them that if they want to march into Iraq they will have to do so 
without the support of the Italian military."

Demonstrators in San Francisco, New York, Chicago, Portland and many 
other smaller communities showed that not all American citizens support 
Bush's warmongering.

The US demonstrations were organised by the "Not in Our Name" movement. 
Marchers used a selection of choice adjectives to describe Bush — 
"warmonger", "racist", "irresponsible" and "stoopid" (sic).

"This is a country full of people that won't let the government start this 
immoral war in our name", said organiser Tanya Mayo from a stage swathed in 
peace banners, blue balloons and the names of victims of past wars.

"We don't want war. It's clearly for fabricated reasons", said Taliya 
Ansari. "We don't want people to die. Iraq is not doing anything to us."

At the United Nations it appears that the US has succeeded in 
pressuring the Chief Weapons Inspector, Hans Blix to support principle US 
demands. After meeting with Secretary of State, Colin Powell, Blix is 
reported to have said that there was "very broad support" in the Security 
Council for a new resolution setting tough terms for inspections.

He is also reported to have supported the threat of consequences if Iraq 
fails to disarm. Instead of following the US path to justify a war Hans 
Blix should make clear to the Americans that he is under the direction of 
the UN Security Council and is not a US stooge.

Another development is the revelation that a secret document prepared in 
September 2000, by the "Project for the New American Century" think tank 
(and before Bush was elected), outlines the course now being implemented by 
Bush and his hard core of warmongers.

The document was drawn up by Dick Cheney (now Vice-President), Donald 
Rumsfeld (Defence Secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy) and George 
Bush's younger brother Jeb.

The plan shows that these conspirators who now make up Bush's principle 
cabinet members, intended to take military control of the Gulf region 
whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power.

It says: "The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent 
role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq 
provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American 
force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam."

The document which has been published by the Scottish Sunday Herald 
is a "blueprint for maintaining global US pre-eminence, precluding the 
rise of a great power rival and shaping the international security order in 
line with American principles and interests."

The report describes US armed forces abroad as "the cavalry on the new 
American frontier".

Commenting on the document, Tam Dalyell, British Labour MP who is regarded 
as the father of the House of Commons said: "This is a blueprint for US 
world domination — a new world order of their making. These are the 
thought processes of fantasist (sic) Americans who want to control the 
world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got 
into bed with a crew which has this moral standing."

Back to index page