|

Issue # 1399 18 February 2009
“Supporting the Palestinian people’s struggle for self-determination
is a duty of Israeli communists.”
Interview with Mohammed Nafa’h, Secretary General of
the Communist Party of Israel

Efraim Davidi & Gema Delgado
The Communist Party of Israel celebrates its 90th
anniversary this year. The party is one of the three organizations that
trace their lineage to the Palestine Communist Party since the late 1940s,
the other two being the Palestinian People’s Party and the Jordanian Communist
Party.
The CPI has a three-deputy parliamentary fraction
in the Knesset (Israeli parliament) and several mayors, including the mayor
of the “Arab capital” of Israel, the city of Nazareth, where the CPI has
governed for the last 32 years. It also has a significant presence among
students and trade unionists.
In the last municipal elections in November, Communist
MK Dov Khenin obtained 36 percent of the votes in the city of Tel Aviv,
against the Labor mayor who received 51 percent. The CPI, Marxist-Leninist,
is the only party in Israel in which Jews and Arabs are equally important
members, and the party publishes the only daily Arabic-language communist
newspaper in the Middle East, Al Ittihad
(Unity), and a Hebrew weekly newspaper Zo
Haderekh (The Path).
Mundo Obrero: Since December
28, the Communist Party has called demonstrations around the country against
the Israeli military aggression on the Gaza Strip. What is the position
of the Communist Party of Israel on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict?
Mohammed Nafa’h: Since 1947,
our party has advocated the position of “two states for two peoples” and
supports the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination, i.e., the
Palestinians’ right to a free and sovereign state in the territories occupied
by Israel in June 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital. We also demand
the dismantlement of the Jewish settlements in the territories and the solution
to the question of the Palestinian refugees in accordance with the UN resolutions.
MO: And on the situation
in the West Bank and the “wall of shame”?
MN: Israel must withdraw
to the ceasefire lines prior to the war of June 1967 and dismantle the wall,
which we call in Hebrew and Arabic: the apartheid wall.
MO: How do you coordinate
your activism against the assault on the Palestinian people, in this case
in Gaza, with social, anti-war, and campus-based movements?
MN: First, we try to establish
the broadest possible alliances, as it is clear that the Communists aren’t
the only ones opposed to the Israeli occupation. Second, we try to coordinate
street protests with political consciousness raising and “practical” solidarity:
sending clothes, food, and other humanitarian aids.
The fact that more than 700 have been arrested in the demonstrations,
from Nazareth and Haifa in the north to Be’er Sheva in the Negev desert,
shows that many people have been moved to action by so much death and disaster.
Finally, it means that we act in coordination with forces of the Palestinian
Left.
Traditionally, with the Palestinian Communists, but the
day before the attack, knowing that its commencement was imminent, we got
together in the city of Ramallah with the leaders of the Popular Front for
the Liberation of Palestine, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of
Palestine, and the (Communist) People’s Party in order to join forces. We
held discussions with them again the day after the Israeli withdrawal.
MO: How would you explain,
to foreigners, the fact that over 70 percent of the Israeli population support
or justify the Israeli military attacks on Gaza that have killed more than
1,300 Palestinians, 90 percent of whom were civilians according to some
humanitarian organisations?
MN: Regrettably, a large
part of the Israeli population has been deceived by the fallacious official
propaganda that defined the colonial war in Gaza as an “act of self-defence.”
Censorship and self-censorship of the local media contributed to this. TV
viewers in Israel did not see the dreadful scenes on their screens that
people in Madrid or Barcelona saw night after night.
Furthermore, Hamas’s adventurist policy and its repeated
provocations also contributed to turning the mostly poor civilian population
of southern Israel into victims of missiles launched from Gaza. Many times,
we have said that we support the struggle against the occupation, the political,
mass struggle of the Palestinians, but we condemn attacks on the civilian
population on either side of the border.
Time and again, we have reiterated that there is no military
solution to the Palestinian problem; the only solution is the end of the
occupation and the creation of a Palestinian state. We have expressed this
position before, during, and after the criminal attack perpetrated in January.
MO: In 2003, there was an
attempt to assassinate the former Secretary General, Issam Makhoul, by placing
a bomb under his car, though miraculously his life was saved. Why did the
perpetrators want to kill him? What is it like to live as the “enemies”
of Zionist politics in the state of Israel?
MN: It is no secret that
the democratic spaces in Israel are threatened by the government as well
as extremist right-wing groups, officially “out of control”, but everybody
knows who is in charge of them. During the protests in recent weeks over
700 demonstrators were arrested, and some are still under detention until
their trials.
Right-wing groups attacked our events, causing injuries,
while the police were “looking the other way.” The war has unleashed a truly
racist campaign against the Arab population under the leadership of the
chauvinist party “Yisrael Beiteinu” (Israel Is Our Home) of the racist Avigdor
“Yvette” Lieberman. In other words, there is a real danger that the Israeli
society is advancing into the fascist direction, whose first victims will
be the Arab-Palestinian national minority and the consistent left-wing sectors.
MO: Do you have contacts
with Jewish communists living outside Israel and do they share your rejection
of the Israeli policy of war against the Palestinian people?
MN: Our party does not claim
to be “Jewish” or “Arab.” Ours is a class-based party that makes no ethnic
or religious distinctions. We have close ties with all pro-peace and progressive
Jewish activists and organisations in Europe, Latin America, North America,
and Australia. The Israeli leadership seek to galvanize the Jewish communities
around the world into adopting their colonialist positions, but there are
large Jewish sectors, organisations as well as individuals, that disagree
with them and are even fighting against this colonialist policy. Not every
Jew is a Zionist, neither in the rest of the world nor even in Israel.
MO: What relations do you
have with the Communist Parties in Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Turkey,
Lebanon, and Jordan?
MN: Our party has close relations
and frequent contacts with Communist Parties and workers in the Middle East.
Primarily with the Palestinian Communists, with whom we have closely collaborated
since the beginning of the occupation in 1967, bringing all kinds of material
and political support.
Do not forget that supporting the Palestinian people’s struggle
for self-determination is an international duty of Israeli communists. We
also maintain ties with the Tudeh Party of Iran, and last year we published
a joint declaration of the Communists of the United States, Iran, and Israel
warning that an attack on Iran would bring the region a tragedy of major
consequences. The Communists of the Middle East get together at least once
a year.
MO: What are the hidden objectives
of the government behind the attack on Gaza and what relation does this
show of force have with the next Israeli general elections in February?
MN: The Israeli government
tried to deal a blow to Hamas, but what it did was to victimise all Palestinians
in Gaza, particularly civilians. The objective is clear: to try to deepen
the existing division – which is unfortunate – among the major Palestinian
factions to postpone the creation of an independent state. In the ruling
Kadima and Labor parties there are those who believed that the colonial
war would bring some political gains in the upcoming elections. But the
only beneficiaries have been the racist, far-rightist parties.
MO: What are the main points
of your program for the elections?
MN: When we began the parliamentary
election campaign, once the municipal elections were finalised in November
2008, we thought that we could present a program that we would characterise
as “against the current”: against capitalism, against the occupation, against
privatisation, against globalisation, and against racism, and for the rights
of working men and women, for equality of the Arab population of Israel,
for a healthy environment, for the rights of gays and lesbians.
We called this program “a new socialist agenda for Israel.”
But with the criminal war and its terrible consequences in January, we had
to abandon the plan and invest all our human resources, which are considerable,
and all our material resources, which are meagre, in the struggle against
the war and its domestic consequences: particularly racism and fascism.
Anyway, we make clear that capitalism engenders the occupation, oppression,
and racism.
Faced with the international capitalist crisis, which is
hitting Israeli workers hard, the next government that gets elected won’t
last in power for long. Its fall will be due to the multiple crises that
beset Israel: the crisis of the occupation, the capitalist crisis, the crisis
of political leadership thanks to their bribes and kickbacks, and the ideological
crisis of Zionism.
All these situations will open up a new period of social
and class struggles and new resistances to the occupation. Many young people
look to the Communist Party and understand that we are marking a new path
and presenting a real choice facing the crisis, the multiple crises. We
are very much concerned about the present, but our commitment to the future
is firm. This will be a future of peace and social justice.
People’s Weekly World
(Originally published in the February 2009 issue of Mundo
Obrero
a publication of the Communist Party of Spain.)
Back to index page
Next article
— Culture and Life - fight or flight
|