Communist Party of Australia  

Home


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner

Subscribe

Press Fund


CPA


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction


Contact Us

facebook, twitter


Major Issues

Indigenous

Unions

Health

Housing

Climate Change

Peace

Solidarity/Other


State by State

NSW, Qld, SA, Vic, WA


What's On

Topical


Resources

AMR

Links


Shop@CPA

Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


 

Issue #1532      25 January 2012

“Occupy Nigeria” strike victory

A weeklong nationwide strike resulted in a victory for Nigerians as the government agreed to partially restore a popular fuel subsidy. The decision followed negotiations between labour leaders and government officials in order to avert a shutdown of the country’s vital oil industry.

The spark which set off what has been dubbed “Occupy Nigeria,” largely because of the significant participation of Nigerian youth, was president Goodluck Jonathan’s decision on New Year’s Day to end fuel subsidies.

The government claimed the program is too costly to continue - at an estimated US$8 billion per year - and promised to invest the savings in the development of the nation’s energy and transport infrastructure.

Nigerians responded with anger as the lifting of the fuel subsidy led to dramatic increases in the cost of food, transportation, and other necessities. They also pointed with scepticism to the billions and billions of dollars lost to the nation’s rampant, notorious corruption, a cancer which affects all levels of the economy and government.

Banners in the Lagos demonstrations featured the slogan “Stop corruption, not the subsidy” and protesters re-named the president “Bad luck” Jonathan. Although he was supported by labour unions in his April re-election, Jonathan’s New Year’s surprise engendered strong opposition from a wide spectrum of Nigerian society.

Indeed, while the Nigerian government expected protests, it seems to have been caught off-guard by the immensity and fervour of the nationwide uprising as ordinary Nigerians vented their frustrations with larger issues like poor governance and economic inequality. Some commentators hoped the mass protests would lead to a “Nigerian Spring.”

Tens of thousands of Nigerians protested in the streets of the commercial centre of Lagos, the governmental capital of Abuja, and the largest city in northern Nigeria, Kano. Banks and businesses were shut, schools vacated, international flights cancelled, and the country’s main port closed.

While the demonstrations mostly were described as peaceful and orderly, Nigerian media reported 13 protesters killed and scores injured by the police. Curfews were enacted by local governments in cities across Nigeria.

The nationwide strike entered a new stage when the nation’s oil workers threatened to disrupt the heart of the Nigerian economy. The Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (Pengassan), the biggest oil labour union, ordered its members to stop working, an action that would have drastically affected the country’s production of two million barrels a day.

Since many of the operations are automated, the strike would not necessarily have entirely shut down oil production, but certainly would have sent shockwaves throughout the global capitalist economy. The members of the second largest oil labour union, the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers, already had stopped working in solidarity with the nationwide strike.

Pengassan officials suspended the strike in favour of negotiations. president Jonathan announced that fuel prices would be cut by a third and promised to tackle corruption in the oil industry. Although he emphasised the price cut was temporary, unions called off the nationwide strike so that Nigerians could return to work and school.

Pengassan president Babtunde Ogun labelled the government’s removal of the fuel subsidy “illegal, hasty, without consultation, and lacking in transparency”. Ordinary Nigerians consider the two-decade-old subsidy the only perk they enjoy from Nigeria’s oil wealth. Neo-liberal economists argue the subsidy discourages investment in local refineries and fosters corruption.

The removal of the fuel subsidy struck ordinary Nigerians very hard as the price of gas doubled. While there is a popular perception of fabulously wealthy Nigerians living in mansions and driving the latest luxury cars, fostered in “Nollywood” films and the so-called prosperity Christian churches, at least two-thirds of Nigerians live on less than US$1.25 a day. The continent’s most populous nation and sub-Saharan Africa’s second largest economy is a country of extremes, where the super-rich live next to the destitute poor.

And despite being Africa’s number one oil producer, accounting for 80 percent of the nation’s revenues, Nigeria imports 70 percent of its fuel since it does not have sufficient refining capacity.

Nigeria is the fifth largest oil exporter to the United States, which maintains a significant military presence in the resource-rich West African sub-region, through its infamous AFRICOM program. Most of the oil is derived from offshore oil platforms owned by foreign firms like Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell, the latter famously accused of environmental degradation and complicity in human rights abuses in the Niger Delta.

In short, oil production in Nigeria is a case study in neo-liberal economics and the threatened shutdown by oil workers would have had global ramifications. Yet, the government’s reversal on ending fuel subsidies displays the power workers have to potentially disrupt the capitalist economy.

People’s World  

Next article – Unions tell world leaders: Choose “jobs” or “social collapse”

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA