Communist Party of Australia  


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner


Press Fund


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction

Contact Us

facebook, twitter

Major Issues





Climate Change



What's On






Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


Issue #1632      March 26, 2014

Crimeans choose Russia

March 16 was historic. It was important. Crimean authorities showed how real democracy works. They shamed America’s sham process. Monied interests control things. People have no say. Both major parties control a rigged process. They’re two sides of the same coin.

Not a dime’s worth of difference separates them. Independent candidates are virtually shut out. Americans get the best democracy money can buy.

Crimeans got the real thing. International observers praised the process. Voting went peacefully and smoothly. It was scrupulously open, free, and fair. No irregularities occurred. None were seen. No pressure. No intimidation.

Not a single Russian soldier in sight. None invaded. None occupy Crimea. Claims otherwise are false. They’re Western propaganda. They’re malicious lies.

Turnout was impressive. It was unprecedented. It exceeded 83%. In Sevastopol, it was 89.5%. Over 1.274 million Crimeans voted. Plus Sevastopol residents excluded from this total.

An astonishing 96.77% chose Russia – 95.6% of Sevastopol voters. A previous article said Russians comprise about 60% of Crimea’s population. Ukrainians around 25%. Tatars 12%.

Results show Crimeans overwhelmingly reject Kiev putschists. Russians, Ukrainians and Tatars agree. Claims otherwise are false

Referendum Commission chairman Mikhail Malyshev said: “We were receiving protocols from the 27 district commissions all night long. The last one came at around 6:00am. After that, our commission compiled the final protocol.” Commission members signed the official document. It certified election results.

A scant 0.72% of ballots were declared invalid.

Crimean Prime Minister Sergei Aksionov addressed a Simferopol rally, saying:

“No one can take away our victory. We are going to Russia.” His speech was accompanied by the Russian national anthem.

“We are going home,” he added. “Crimea within Russia. Hooray, comrades.”

Parliament Speaker Vladimir Konstantinov added: “We have done it! You have done it! This is our victory, and nobody can take it away from us.”

Crimeans celebrated their landslide victory.

Ludmila Balatskays is a 72-year-old former Sevastapol city government deputy. “Today is the greatest day of my life,” she said. “We are returning to mother Russia. I was just a little girl when they just informed us that Crimea was now Ukraine. Everything fell down around me.

“We are Russia. We have always been Russian people in our souls here in Crimea, but today that becomes a practical reality again.”

She spoke with tears in her eyes. Most other Crimeans share her joy.

Gennady Basov chairs the Sevastopol Russian Block party. He said choosing Russia gives Crimea “protection from the neo-Nazis and fascists in Kiev.”

Russian State Duma Speaker Sergey Naryshkin highlighted Western hypocrisy. On the one hand, its officials reject Crimean self-determination rights. On the other, they call Kiev putschists legitimate. They ignored their brazen coup d’état.

On March 17, Crimea asked UN authorities and international community countries to recognise their self-determination. A resolution was adopted doing so. “The Republic of Crimea seeks equality, peace, and good-neighbourliness as well as political, economic and cultural cooperation,” with all other nations, it said.

Russian State Duma Vice Speaker Sergei Neverov said parliamentarians will complete all necessary legislative procedures on accommodating Crimeans at the earliest possible time.

“The results of the Crimean referendum have clearly indicated that the residents of Crimea see their future only as part of Russia,” he said.

“They voted for reunification of the people who always lived together.” The number of people who came to polling stations and supported Crimea’s re-unification with Russia speaks for itself.

“It’s a reply to all those who attempted, throughout the past weeks, to prevent the residents of Crimea from determining their own destiny, their own future and the future of their children.”

Russian upper house Federation Council Foreign Policy Committee deputy chairman Andrei Klimov praised Crimea’s democratic process, saying:

“What we saw in Crimea was a direct expression of citizens’ will – a system that the Americans might stand to benefit from. The people of any territory on the globe should have the right to determine its destiny independently.

“Whatever the situation, the people of Crimea didn’t give the right to choose destiny-making options for themselves either to Washington or to Brussels.

“A statement by White House press secretary that the referendum in Crimea stands at variance with the Ukrainian Constitution and hence the US rejects it is all too obvious.

“The thing is the White House is playing on the side of the new coalition in Kiev, and the US always supports only the ‘democracy’ that serves its national interests.”

On March 21, Federation Council and State Duma members will vote up or down on letting Crimea join the Russian Federation. Sentiment in both houses suggests overwhelming approval.

Days earlier, Federation Council chairwoman Valentina Matviyenko said so. Russian State Duma Speaker Sergey Naryshkin echoed her sentiment.

Russia has been losing people for years, he said. “At last, we’re getting our compatriots back. So that’s a historic moment for Russia.” Putin has the final say.

Crimean Parliament Speaker Konstantinov said Crimea can join Russia in weeks. Perhaps by end of March, he added. Crimea will draft a new constitution. “We will send it for approval to the Russian parliament,” he explained.

Steps are underway to shift from Ukraine’s hryvnia to Russia’s ruble. Next week, the ruble will be introduced as a second official currency. Dual currencies will continue for about six months. Thereafter, Ukraine’s hryvnia will be discontinued.

According to Crimea’s Prime Minister Aksyonov, integrating Crimea fully into Russia may take up to a year. Perhaps sooner, he added. At the same time, Crimea wants good relations with all nations, he stressed.

Reuters said an initial list of up to 130 senior Russian officials would be reduced to perhaps “tens or scores” for final consideration. Washington readied its own list. White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said, “You can expect sanctions designations in the coming days.” Perhaps sooner.

Similar asset freezes and travel bans on Russian officials were announced. Putin was excluded.

Washington imposed sanctions on 11 Russian and former Viktor Yanukovych government officials. Moscow’s Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin was named.

A White House statement said sanctions target officials who “undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine.” None exist except in Crimea.

On March 6, Obama’s Executive Order authorised “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine.” It applies to foreign nationals and Americans. Property belonging to Russian nationals can be seized.

The same applies to “any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organised under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.”

Ahead of Crimea’s referendum, Obama declared a national emergency. He considers Crimean self-determination a “threat to US national security.”

For sure it’s a threat of a good example. It runs counter to Washington’s imperial ambitions.

Obama usurped the right to seize (read steal) assets belonging to anyone (including US citizens) “determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State”:

  1. to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following:
    1. actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine;
    2. actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine; or
    3. misappropriation of state assets of Ukraine or of an economically significant entity in Ukraine.

Wiggle room language permits circumventing fundamental rule of law principles. So-called “direct or indirect … actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine” aren’t defined.

Nor is how Crimean self-determination threatens US national security. The claim is absurd on its face. It’s outrageous. It’s offensive. It turns logic on its head. It reveals lawless US governance.

Obama can act any way he wishes. He can do so by diktat. He can act lawlessly. He can enforce Washington rules. He’s playing with fire. British MP George Galloway is right saying Western leaders created a Frankenstein monster in Ukraine.

It’s “a very serious threat,” he said. The damn fools in Washington and Brussels perhaps didn’t “read the novel Frankenstein to the end,” said Galloway.

“If they had, they’d have known that the monster Dr Frankenstein created quickly got out of control. That’s why it’s called a monster.”

“And this monstrous” Kiev neo-Nazi threat poses potential grave problems for Europe. Perhaps for humanity if war erupts.

Next article – Culture & Life – Ukrainian fascists and US incidents

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA