Communist Party of Australia  

Home


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner

Subscribe

Press Fund


CPA


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction


Contact Us

facebook, twitter


Major Issues

Indigenous

Unions

Health

Housing

Climate Change

Peace

Solidarity/Other


State by State

NSW, Qld, SA, Vic, WA


What's On

Topical


Resources

AMR

Links


Shop@CPA

Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


 

Issue #1664      November 12, 2014

No private health insurance in primary care

Brett Holmes, general secretary the NSW Nurses and Midwives’ Association, has written to Peter Dutton, federal Minister for Health, putting on record the NSWNMA’s opposition to letting the private health insurance industry into primary health care.

The Hon Peter Dutton MP
Minister for Health
PO Box 6022
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600

Dear Minister,

Re: Private Health Insurance in the primary care sector

I wish to place on the record my Association’s opposition to the introduction of private health insurance into primary health care.

The NSW Nurses and Midwives’ Association (NSWNMA) seeks to protect and advance the interests of nurses and midwives and the nursing and midwifery professions. We are also dedicated to improving standards of patient care and the quality of health and aged care services.

We are committed to the notion of health as a public good with shared benefits and shared responsibilities. We believe that access to adequate healthcare is the right of every Australian and a crucial element of the Australian social compact. We are committed to publicly-funded universal health insurance as the most efficient and effective mechanism to distribute resources in a manner that generally ensures timely and equitable access to affordable healthcare on the basis of clinical need rather than capacity to pay.

It is well understood that the prohibition on private health insurance coverage in the primary care sector has been an important lever that has contained costs and supported equity in access for GP care. As we confront the challenges of the aging population, particularly growth in demand for management of chronic illness, this cost-containment is vital to ensure timely access to care and manageable costs overall.

While there will be clear benefits for fund members, what are the benefits for the uninsured? Providing preferential access to privately insured patients (what point would there be in purchasing insurance otherwise?) will further entrench a two-tier system and stands in stark contrast to the principles of equity and universal access which underpin the Australian healthcare system.

It will also exacerbate the gap between health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-indigenous Australians as the rates of private insurance uptake in that community are very low. Those without private health insurance will experience reduced or delayed access, worsening health status and will increasingly burden public hospitals with avoidable complications and admissions.

The notion that an insurance entity should have a role in dictating when and how a patient can access primary care is completely rejected by my membership. Access to that care must be on the basis of need; it must not be determined by private health membership status.

Yours sincerely

Brett Holmes
General Secretary

Next article – End campaign of repression in Sudan

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA