Communist Party of Australia  


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner


Press Fund


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction

Contact Us

facebook, twitter

Major Issues





Climate Change



State by State

NSW, Qld, SA, Vic, WA

What's On






Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


Issue #1686      May 27, 2015

Sydney University silent on professor cleared of anti-Semitism

Jake Lynch, an associate professor at Sydney University, has been cleared of any suspicion of anti-Semitic behaviour while defending students who disrupted a March 11 talk by pro-Israel lobbyist Richard Kemp.

Jake Lynch, an associate professor at Sydney University.

You’d think that this finding would be good news for the University of Sydney management. It can now come to the defence of its employee and seek to remedy the damage done to his reputation and to its own.

In recent times, the university has been embroiled in a racism scandal surrounding Professor of English Barry Spurr, who referred to Aboriginal Australians as “human rubbish tips.” One could assume, then, that its management might be relieved not to have a similar anti-Semitism controversy to deal with.

So far, though, university management has not publicly announced the investigation results, effectively allowing the accusation of anti-Semitism to continue to tarnish the reputation of Lynch and other staff and students who support the Palestinian call for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel.

It fell to Lynch’s union, the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU), to inform its members that the accusations of anti-Semitism had been dismissed.

Tens of thousands of students and non-union staff, who all received correspondence headlined “Concerns about anti-Semitism on campus” from Michael Spence, the university’s vice-chancellor, remain in the dark on this point.

Aspersions left hanging

Why is the university’s leadership keeping silent about Lynch’s vindication? Surely it would be appropriate, at the very least, for Spence to reassure his institution’s Jewish staff and students that troubling rumours of anti-Semitism on campus have been shown to be groundless.

Spence has stated that he wishes to avoid prejudicing the outcome of the ongoing disciplinary processes by making further comment. Yet is it not highly prejudicial to leave aspersions of anti-Semitism hanging in the air, while the university begins prosecuting pro-Palestine activists on entirely different grounds?

The defeat of the anti-Semitism slur will be disappointing for those who raised it so insistently: groups such as the Australasian Union of Jewish Students, who petitioned for Lynch to be sacked for anti-Semitic behaviour.

By keeping quiet, the university is allowing these pro-Israel voices to avoid questions about their role in formulating and promoting the evidently false charge of anti-Semitism against Lynch.

Although the main thrust of the attack on Lynch – the accusation of anti-Semitism – has now collapsed, the university has initiated formal proceedings against him for breaches of a staff code of conduct. It also intends to bring disciplinary action against five pro-Palestine students.

The codes of conduct, according to a recent statement from the university, “require all staff, students and affiliates to be tolerant, honest, respectful and ethical at all times.” Punitive measures to enforce these codes are necessary, the vice-chancellor has argued, because Sydney University “must remain an institution where discourse is civil.”

Affront to civil liberties

These words will be familiar to those following the case of Steven Salaita, who was “un-hired” by the University of Illinois for his supposedly uncivil tweets about Israel’s attack on Gaza during the summer of 2014.

Joan W Scott has recently chronicled the history of “civility” as a concept invoked to silence dissent on campus, a study highly redolent of the situation at Sydney University.

While the specific charges against Lynch and the students remained wrapped up behind confidentiality clauses, the basic facts of the meeting involving Kemp, a former colonel in the British Army, are well known.

Students raised their voices in protest against a notorious apologist for Israeli war crimes. While remonstrating with security guards to stop them from brutalising these students, Lynch defended himself against abuse and physical assault from other audience members.

The suggestion that these actions warrant disciplinary action, carrying penalties up to and including sacking (for Lynch) and expulsion (for the students), plainly constitutes an affront to civil liberties on campus.

This continuing witch-hunt will be fought with a vigorous political campaign. The open letter calling on Spence to drop charges against pro-Palestine activists has already attracted more than 1,600 signatories, including prominent figures such as Desmond Tutu, Noam Chomsky and John Pilger, along with politicians from the Australian Greens and Australian Labor Party.

The NTEU has taken a strong stance in defence of Lynch, writing to Spence that it “believes the allegations are without substance and solely designed to placate external parties that have pressured the vice-chancellor.”

For its part, the Student Representative Council has unanimously endorsed a motion expressing solidarity with the victimised students.

David Brophy is a lecturer at the University of Sydney. He is a member of Sydney Staff for BDS and National Tertiary Education Union Members for BDS.

The Electronic Intifada

Next article – Austerity measures in Greece – The need for change in the class structure of society

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA