Communist Party of Australia  

Home


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner

Subscribe

Press Fund


CPA


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction


Contact Us

facebook, twitter


Major Issues

Indigenous

Unions

Health

Housing

Climate Change

Peace

Solidarity/Other


State by State

NSW, Qld, SA, Vic, WA


What's On

Topical


Resources

AMR

Links


Shop@CPA

Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


 

Issue #1686      May 27, 2015

The dilemma of soy

Since 1996, when Argentina began planting genetically modified soy, its expansion has resulted in the displacement of local farmers and has thus compromised the country’s food security. Fabiana Frayssinet reports on these and other adverse effects of industrial soy production.

Industrial soy production continues to expand in Argentina, pushing small farmers out of the countryside and replacing other crops and cattle.

It presents a challenge in a country where 70 percent of the food consumed comes from family farms, but which also needs the foreign exchange brought in by what has been dubbed “green gold”.

In 2013, exports of soybeans, soybean meal and soybean oil brought in US$23.2 billion, representing 26 percent of the country’s total sales abroad, according to the business chamber that represents producers of grains and cereals, the Camara de la Industria Aceitera-Centro de Exportadores de Cereales. That makes transgenic soybeans Argentina’s main source of foreign currency. And the soybean production chain accounts for 5.5% of GDP and 10% of tax revenue.

“Above and beyond the questions of taxes or added value, without a doubt soy is the biggest contributor in the chain of oilseed production, in exports and in the surplus of dollars that it brings the economy,” economist Luciano Cohan told Inter Press Service.

“Without the dollars brought in by soy, the economy of the country would have to make a tremendous adjustment,” added the author of “El aporte de la cadena de soja a la economia argentina” (“The soybean chain’s contribution to the Argentine economy”).

Soy, which covers 31 million hectares, is Argentina’s leading crop. In 1990, there were only 4.8 million hectares of soy, according to the Asociacion de la Cadena de la Soja (ACSOJA), the soy industry association.

Cohan said the expansion began in 1996, when genetically modified soy began to be planted, and it picked up speed in 2008, when producers began to grow soy to the detriment of other crops like wheat, after a crisis in rural areas due to a conflict between agribusiness and the centre-left government.

“Due to several reasons, [genetically modified] soy can be seen as a less risky crop than other activities,” he said. “For example, it is much cheaper to produce soy than maize, beef or dairy products, and it is a crop that has fewer regulatory risks.”

“ ‘Soyisation’ in terms of monoculture is not a positive thing,” agronomist and academic Carlos Toledo says.

“But if producers don’t see better conditions for planting other crops, and if soy brings in the best tax revenue for the state, we find ourselves in a vicious circle that is very dangerous for the sustainability of our production systems.”

Impact on farming

“The growth in the surface area covered by soy and by transgenic commodities in general has meant the displacement of local farmers and an increase in cattle raised in feedlots,” says Carlos Vicente, a member of GRAIN, a Barcelona-based international organisation dedicated to global agricultural issues.

As an example of the impact, he said, thousands of small dairy farms had closed down. “In the [eastern] province of Buenos Aires alone, 300 shut down,” he said. “This means production is stagnant and concentrated in the hands of large producers, who are now acting as an oligopoly.”

A study by Miguel Teubal, a researcher at Argentina’s National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), reports that between 1997 and 2005, soy production rose by nearly 20 million tons, while the sunflower harvest fell by two million tons and rice fell by 0.5 million.

In the central province of Cordoba alone, the increase in soy production led to a shrinking of the number of head of cattle by 17 percent. The production of fruit and vegetables around the big cities also went down, “driving up the prices of widely-consumed basic products like tomatoes and potatoes”, the report said.

Soybean production has also led to greater concentration of land ownership, while driving up the value of land, GRAIN said. In 2010, more than 50% of soybean cultivation was controlled by just 3% of producers.

“That led to an unprecedented rural exodus: by 2007, more than 200,000 small farmers and rural workers and their families had left the countryside,” Vicente said.

“Soy is important as a source of income to finance social plans,” he said. “But the big paradox is that those plans will have to cover the basic needs of those who have been driven out of the countryside by this model of production.”

This has seen the exodus of many farmers from the dairy and beef-producing area, who did not necessarily first shift to “the soy model”. They moved to cities because their productive activities were not supporting them and they saw no future for their families.

According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 14.4 percent of the territory in Argentina – nearly one hectare per capita – is still available for cultivation.

For that reason food security and soy production run on different tracks. The question is whether small and medium-sized farmers are being provided with better conditions for diversifying their production.

Food security

To strengthen family farms, in 2008, the government of President Cristina Fernandez created what is now called the Secretariat of Family Agriculture and Rural Development.

And in January last, a law was passed on “historic reparations for family agriculture to build a new rural reality in Argentina”, which says family farms are “of public interest” due to their contribution to food security and sovereignty.

Figures from the government’s National Registry of Family Agriculture indicate that the sector represents 20% of agricultural GDP, 20% of the country’s farmland, 65% of farmers and 53% of rural employment. It also provides 70% of the food consumed in this country of 42 million people.

But 66% of farming families live in poverty, FAO reported.

The aims of the Secretariat include curbing the rural exodus, creating one million farms for some five million people.

“We need 50 years of investment in the agricultural sector to recover what has been destroyed,” said the head of the Secretariat, Emilio Persico. But Persico added: “The issue is not soy, it’s agribusiness”.

“The most important conflicts we have aren’t with soy,” he said. “In Santiago [del Estero], we have problems with cattle farmers, in Rio Negro with alfalfa producers, in Misiones with pine exporters, and in Mendoza with wine producers.”

Miguel Fernandez, the head of the Foro Nacional de Agricultura Familiar, the family farmers’ association, mentioned other causes of the exodus, such as deforestation (partially fuelled by soy cultivation), climate change (floods and harsh droughts have hit poor farmers hard), and large-scale business developments in real estate deals, tourism and agribusiness.

“The possibilities of producing more or of owning our own land are disappearing ... small farmers have been driven away by the rich, as if we were dogs; they have us cornered,” he told IPS.

To turn that process around, Vicente said, efforts are needed to combat other critical problems, such as the monopoly exercised by the multinational agrochemical corporations that produce genetically modified seeds, and the way they are “displacing and contaminating other crops”.

“These agrochemicals and transgenic seeds destroy the soil,” Fernandez said. ‘We are worried that even though we have land, in the future we won’t be able to grow anything.”

Third World Resurgence


Poem

YOU ARE MY COUNTRY

You are the field
I am the tractor
You are the paper
I am the typewriter
My wife
The mother of our son
You are a song
I am the guitar
I am a damp, warm windy evening
You are a woman strolling on the quay
And watching the lights on the other side
I am the water
You are the one who drinks it.
I am walking along the street
You are the one who opens the window
To wave at me.
You are China
I am the army of Mao Tse Tung
You are a fourteen-year-old Philippine girl
I am rescuing you
From the hands of an American marine.
You are a village in Anatolia
On top of a mountain
You are my city the most beautiful
You are a cry for help.
You are my country
The footsteps running towards you are mine.

Next article – Ukraine – Inflation, rampant unemployment, human misery

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA