Communist Party of Australia  

Home


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner

Subscribe

Press Fund


CPA


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction


Contact Us

facebook, twitter


Major Issues

Indigenous

Unions

Health

Housing

Climate Change

Peace

Solidarity/Other


State by State

NSW, Qld, SA, Vic, WA


What's On

Topical


Resources

AMR

Links


Shop@CPA

Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


 

Issue #1706      October 14, 2015

Devastating effects of US blockade

Meeting with reporters on September 17, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez discussed his ministry’s recent report on the US economic blockade against Cuba. The 36-page document presents Cuba’s case in advance of an October 27 vote in the United Nations General Assembly on a Cuban resolution calling for the blockade’s end. This will be the 24th consecutive year for such a vote. The Assembly has recently approved the resolution overwhelmingly – 188 nations in favour last year, two opposed.

Protest outside the US Consulate in Sydney’s Martin Place earlier this year to demand that the US end its blockade on Cuba.

This year is different. Cuba and the United States recently re-established diplomatic relations. The Obama administration has eased some embargo rules through executive action. And the President has urged the US Congress to exercise powers it gained through the 1996 Helms–Burton Law and lift the blockade.

Nevertheless, Rodriguez pointed out, “The blockade continues to be tightened with notable, increased extra-territorial application, in particular in the financial arena.” It’s the “principal obstacle to our development” and “leads to unmet needs and deprivations for all Cuban families.” According to the report, the blockade has deprived Cuba of US$834 billion (allowing for inflation) over the 50 years of its existence.

It surveys multiple US laws undergirding the blockade, details executive actions the Obama administration has already taken, and has recommendations for further presidential initiatives. In particular the document underscores hardship from financial services being withheld by international bankers and lending institutions seeking to avoid US sanctions. The report surveys present day US and international actions and campaigns opposing the blockade.

The overall thrust of the report is to emphasise the complexity and reach of blockade regulations. Prohibitions on exports to Cuba from foreign subsidiaries of US corporations, for instance, interfere with Cuba’s efforts to acquire needed medical supplies. The report makes it clear that any congressional action taken to end regulations most responsible for damage in Cuba must be comprehensive.

Cuba’s report submitted to the General Assembly catalogues stories of distress and dysfunction stemming from the blockade. Its descriptions of adverse effects on agencies, organisations, companies, hospital patients, students, farmers, and athletes are taken from the year ending on June 1, 2015. Some examples follow:

  • In March 2015 the US Treasury Department fined Commerzbank of Germany US$2,283,456 for violating regulations on Cuba (56 transactions) and three other countries.
  • Because foreign banks often refuse to handle dollars intended for Cuba, Cuba faces the loss of US$27,645,000 owed for patient care for foreigners in Cuba and for academic services.
  • “Botox”, a US–made drug used to treat some 50 diseases, is obtainable in third countries only and so costs US$500 instead of US$200 per dose.
  • Cuban haematologists can’t monitor adverse effects of the anti-cancer drug Methotrexate because they lack “diagnostic systems” made in the United States.
  • Medical imaging systems often don’t work because they depend for activation on computer programming from Microsoft – which is unavailable.
  • Because technical equipment made by US companies or their foreign affiliates is off limits, medical geneticists have to send tissue samples to foreign labs.
  • A paediatric cardiology hospital must do without diagnostic catheter equipment manufactured only in the United States.
  • Having to buy seeds in Europe and Japan added US$592,269,000 in agricultural sector costs.
  • Due to shipping costs, Cuban educators had to pay 30 percent extra to obtain disposable school supplies available only in Europe.
  • Cuban athletes competing internationally missed out on prizes paid for in dollars.

These items represent but a tiny fraction of grief-ridden incidents included in Cuba’s report for this year. Earlier reports documented hundreds more.

The 2015 version of the report to the UN General Assembly leaves out references to genocide found in earlier ones. Yet State Department strategic proposals on Cuba in 1960 anticipated that crime. As conveyed by Foreign Minister Rodriguez in his remarks, those proposals called for the “greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.”

The Obama administration is steering now on a delicate course. Reportedly the US government may abstain from the approaching General Assembly vote on the Cuban resolution. In mid-September, however, Obama took criticism for re-authorising the Trading with the Enemy Act as it applies to Cuba.

But that made sense, says experienced Washington lawyer Michael Muse. Legislation replacing the TWEA in 1977 “allows the President to continue the TWEA-based embargo on Cuba ... on a year-to-year basis.” Through that law, the president gained “executive authority to relax and modify” embargo provisions. Had Obama not reauthorised the TWEA, the 1977 law would have died, and the Helms-Burton Law of 1966 would have superseded whatever presidential discretion remained.

The blockade saga is grim. Yet Cuban socialism survives, and international solidarity with Cuba flourishes. And the United States had to abandon its way of bringing down a revolution. Measures of social well-being in Cuba are up, and tens of thousands of Cuban doctors are treating illnesses worldwide and training doctors from all over. Surely the scenario is of interim victory in a long struggle.

CounterPunch.org

Next article – Misrepresentation of the Colombian conflict

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA