Communist Party of Australia  

Home


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner

Subscribe

Press Fund


CPA


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction


Contact Us

facebook, twitter


Major Issues

Indigenous

Unions

Health

Housing

Climate Change

Peace

Solidarity/Other


State by State

NSW, Qld, SA, Vic, WA


What's On

Topical


Resources

AMR

Links


Shop@CPA

Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


 

Issue #1749      September 21, 2016

The US blockade of Cuba remains

Although positive steps have been taken to modify aspects of the blockade, existing restrictions impede progress in the normalisation of relations, and on September 14, the President reauthorised the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act, the original basis of the blockade when it was established in 1962

On December 17, 2014, Presidents Raúl Castro Ruz and Barack Obama announced to the world the decision to re-establish diplomatic relations between the governments of Cuba and the United States, opening the doors to future talks to benefit both nations. It might have appeared, at this historic moment, that the economic war waged by the US against Cuba was coming to an end, but this was not the case.

Cuba Vigil at Town Hall, Sydney, September 17.

The hostile policy remains in full force, with blockade regulations enforced by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

February 11, 2015: a Mexican branch of Santander Bank refused to handle a small transaction of 68,290 euros for the Central Bank of Cuba, not to acquire any product, raw material, or do business, but to pay the country’s membership dues to the Centre for Latin American Monetary Research.

March 12: the German financial institution Commerzbank was fined some US$1.7 million by OFAC, for maintaining economic relations with Cuba, among other alleged violations.

March 25: OFAC levied a fine of US$7,658,300 on the US company PayPal for processing transactions which allegedly involved products of Cuban origin or were of Cuban interest.

According to a Ministry of Culture report, between April, 2014, and March of 2015, the blockade caused Cuban cultural entities losses valued at US$24 million, principally in art education and the music industry. In the first case, the blockade has an impact on the quality of training and students’ creativity by restricting availability of basic resources like musical instruments, visual arts supplies, ballet slippers and wardrobe. In the case of music, the impact is felt in relation to live performances by Cuban artists in the United States, obstacles to selling recordings, and income from royalties.

The Ministry of Education has reported that during the same period, the blockade has caused damages of almost US$2 million. Sanctions imposed on international entities that do business with Cuba have led many to avoid exporting articles needed to enhance the teaching-learning process, obliging the country to seek such items in China, and pay higher shipping costs given the distance of this market. Remuneration paid to Cuban educational professionals working in other countries has been affected, as well, by the prohibition on using the US dollar in international transactions.

June 1: the US company SIGMA Aldrich, a leader in the chemical and biochemical industries, refused to supply the Cuban state enterprise QUIMIMPEX products key to its development, alleging that it could not supply products, services, or technical information because of blockade regulations.

The following day, another US company Columbiana Boyler, specialising in the fabrication of pressurised containers, refused to sell QUIMIMPEX cylinders needed to hold chlorine used in treating potable water in the country’s supply system, stating that the Commerce Department had not duly authorised the negotiation of the purchase.

On July 20, 2015, the governments of Cuba and the United States re-established diplomatic relations, and their respective Interest Sections became embassies. Cuban authorities reiterated that in order to normalise relations, Washington needed to lift the blockade; return territory illegally occupied by the US Guantánamo Naval Base; cease illegal radio and television broadcasts directed toward the island; and end efforts to subvert the country’s internal order.

October 27, 2015, in the United Nations General Assembly, 191 countries voted in favour of Cuba’s resolution calling for an end to the blockade, with only two against (the US and Israel), and this time not even any abstentions. This constituted an overwhelming expression of condemnation of US government policy, on the part of the international community, for the 24th time since 1992 – apparently ignored again by authorities in charge of pertinent decisions, since the application of the blockade continues.

In November of 2015, four months after the re-establishment of diplomatic relations, OFAC imposed a fine of US$1,116,893,585 on the French bank Crédit Agricole, for processing 173 electronic transfers, linked to properties of interest to the Cuban government or Cuban citizens, to or through financial institutions located in the United States.

January 20, 2016: the US design company WATG Holdings Inc was fined US$140,400 for violating blockade regulations, because in October of 2009 and May of 2010, its subsidiary in the United Kingdom, Wimberly Allison Tong and Goo, had worked with a Qatari design and architecture firm on a hotel in Cuba, for which it received three payments for a total of US$356,714.

In February this year, the French company CGG Service SA was fined US$614,250 by OFAC, for providing services, replacement parts and equipment of US origin for gas and oil exploration, to ships operating in Cuban territorial waters, during 2010 and 2011. OFAC additionally reported that the Venezuelan branch of CGG Services made five transactions related to the processing of information from seismic studies carried out by a Cuban entity within the country’s exclusive economic zone, noting that this was prejudicial to the sanctions’ objectives, providing a substantial economic benefit to Cuba.

At the end of February, the Treasury Department fined the US company Halliburton US$304,706 for violating blockade regulations. According to an OFAC report, between February and April of 2011 the company and its subsidiaries in the Cayman Islands exported goods and services worth US$1.18 million, to support oil and gas exploration and drilling in the southern block of Costa Adentro, in the Angolan province of Cabinda. According to OFAC, the Cuban company Cupet had interests in the consortium undertaking the work in Angolan territory.

Financial measures against Cuba since the beginning of 2015 through February 2016 were a continuation of those implemented by Obama from the beginning of his administration, reaffirming the maintenance of the economic, commercial, and financial blockade, despite the new context of bilateral relations following the announcements of December 17, 2014, and the subsequent opening of embassies.

During this brief period, the US government fined eight entities in different countries for a total of US$2,836,681,581. As of the aforementioned date, the number of fines levied by the Obama administration for blockade violations was 49, according to CubaMinrex/Cubavsbloqueo, and at this time the accumulated total is US$14,397,416,827.

On March 15, 2016, the US Departments of the Treasury and Commerce announced new modifications in the implementation of the blockade in the areas of travel, financial services, and trade. Among these was a change allowing US citizens to undertake “people-to-people” travel on their own, ending the previous requirement that this category of travel be organised by a licensed tour operator, making such trips costly and complicated. Nonetheless, the specific prohibition on travel for the purpose of tourism remains in place, established by law. Cuba is the only nation in the world which US citizens can not visit as tourists.

Other changes announced included permission for US citizens travelling in other countries to purchase Cuban products, including rum and cigars, something that was previously prohibited. Cuban citizens working in the US with an appropriate visa are now allowed to receive compensation, and US companies can hire Cuban citizens “under certain conditions”, although these have not been specified.

Among the most recent measures was authorisation for Cuba to use the US dollar in international transactions with third countries and in those permitted between Cuban and US institutions. To date, this change has not been implemented. International banks continue to refuse to work with Cuba, given the US sanctions that remain in place. Cuba has yet to make a single payment or deposit in US dollars.

The Italian Banca Nacional del Lavoro, did not credit the account of Cubana Airlines for sales in the months of January and February, 2016 - 144,946 and 130,179 euros respectively. When questioned by the airline’s representative, the bank responded that its client was the International Air Transport Association (IATA), indicating that they would not deal with the Cuban company directly. A similar situation occurred with sales deposits for September, October, and November of 2015, which led to a lack of liquidity that affected the company’s operations. The IATA in Madrid reported that the bank was still refusing to process Cuban transactions because of blockade regulations.

Cuba’s report on the UN resolution to be considered this coming October 26 was presented in a press conference September 9, by Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla. It states that the accumulated damages caused by the US blockade of Cuba have reached US$753,688,000,000, calculated on the basis of the price of gold, taking into consideration its depreciation. At current prices, the amount would equal at least US$125,873,000,000.

The conduct of the US government confirms that although positive steps have been taken to modify the implementation of some aspects of the blockade, the restrictions remaining in effect impede the progress of normalisation of economic relations between the two countries, and now, on September 14, the President has reauthorised the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act, one of the pillars upon which the economic, commercial and financial blockade was based when it was officially established in February of 1962.

Granma

Next article – Dingo

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA