Communist Party of Australia  

Home


The Guardian

Current Issue

PDF Archive

Web Archive

Pete's Corner

Subscribe

Press Fund


CPA


About Us

Why you should ...

CPA introduction


Contact Us

facebook, twitter


Major Issues

Indigenous

Unions

Health

Housing

Climate Change

Peace

Solidarity/Other


State by State

NSW, Qld, SA, Vic, WA


What's On

Topical


Resources

AMR

Links


Shop@CPA

Books, T-shirts, CDs/DVDs, Badges, Misc


 

Issue #1788      August 2, 2017

Letter from Canada

On June 7 Canada’s Minister of National Defence, Harjit Sajjan, announced what he referred to as a “new” defence policy indicating that the Liberal government has bought into a more aggressive role for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and making the Canadian military more suited to “war fighting” in overseas theatres. Mr Sajjan declared Canada will increase war spending over 70 percent during the next 10 years to the tune of $32.7 billion; he also pledged to increase the number of fighter jets to 88 from 65; and to increase the number of personnel in both the regular and reserve armed forces. Still on the table is the issue of Canada officially joining the US “Ballistic Missile” system.

Nothing has changed internationally since the election of the Trudeau government to justify such an increase in Canada’s war-making effort.

“Last year Canada already spent $28 billion on the Department of National Defence which had made it the seventh highest military spender among NATO members and the 17th highest military spender in the world. However, the federal government spent only $1.5 billion for the Department of Environment and Climate Change (ECCC). Over the past two decades, military spending has dramatically increased but funding for environmental protection and climate action has flat-lined.” (Voice of Women for Peace, May 10, 2017).

The stage for Mr Sajjan on June 7 was set by the Minister of International Affairs on June 6. Chrystia Freeland, who should be acting as our top Canadian diplomat, heaped praise on past US aggressions around the globe and reinforced her pro-US military statements with the Russia bogeyman card (reminiscent of Cold War days) and the North Korean card. Ms Freeland must be aware of how many military bases the US has in the world compared to the number of bases the Russians have.

She must know that the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (January 2017) moved the hands on the Doomsday Clock to two and a half minutes to midnight to reflect the danger in the world since the US election. The dream, no nightmare, of fighting and winning a conventional world war or nuclear war is sheer lunacy – Canada should be exerting its best diplomatic efforts to develop peaceful relations with all countries including Russia, China, Syria, and North Korea. As Murray Dobbin has written: “US ‘leadership’ is known by another name in scores of countries around the globe: US imperialism ... Does Freeland believe that the illegal war on Iraq is an example of US leadership? Would she, unlike Jean Chrétien, have joined in? What about the slaughter in Yemen? Going back a bit further, would Freeland see the literally dozens of US interventions to overthrow democratic governments and install dictators as the epitome of US leadership?” (June 9, 2017).

Canada needs new, made-in-Canada policies aimed at the achievement of peace and disarmament in the world. Negotiations are going on at the United Nations to ban nuclear weapons; Canada should be part of these deliberations. In the short term Canada should withdraw from the conflict in Iraq and Syria, stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia; and make diplomacy a top priority. In the long-term Canadians must find the steps to break with the US Empire and the war-making alliances that it leads. Both NATO and NORAD are not contributing to peace and security around the world.

If we must look outside of our borders for leadership we would be wiser to look to Britain than the US – increasing numbers of people in the United Kingdom, especially young people there are embracing a positive, peaceful vision of their country; they also realise if their country is not bombing people in the Middle East they will not be confronted with “blowback”.

Ed Lehman, President, Regina Peace Council, and David Gehl, Vice-President, Regina Peace Council, Canada.

People’s Voice

Next article – Who wants to destroy al-Aqsa?

Back to index page

Go to What's On Go to Shop at CPA Go to Australian Marxist Review Go to Join the CPA Go to Subscribe to the Guardian Go to the CPA Maritime Branch website Go to the Resources section of our web site Go to the PDF of the Hot Earth booklet go to the World Federation of Trade Unions web site go to the Solidnet  web site Go to Find out more about the CPA